Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Gluten Free Ppm?


Modism

Recommended Posts

Modism Newbie

Okay, so I wanted to delete this post since I found my answer but I don't know how....

So, does "gluten free" mean the same thing in Canada and the USA?

My mother said that it's 20ppm, but I have found conflicting sources.

All my gluten free purchases state: made in a gluten free facility. Does this mean they are 100% gluten free? What about cross contamination at the source of the flours?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



MySuicidalTurtle Enthusiast

Instead of deleting this could you tell us what you found out?

psawyer Proficient

In Canada, by law, a product labelled as, or represented to be, "gluten free" can not contain wheat, rye, barley, oats, or any derivative part thereof, period. There is no maximum level, it simply can not be there at all, even if the proteins are processed out somehow, such as by distillation.

There is no legally regulated definition of the term in the USA, although FALCPA requires that one be developed and proposed by 2008.

In Europe, the rules are different, and a product which contains as much as 200 ppm can be labelled "gluten free" under at least some circumstances.

Anything made in a gluten free facility will not contain any intentional gluten at all, but cross contamination is still a very, very slight possibility--an ingredient could be contaminated prior to entering the facility.

TCA Contributor

Psawyer,

Just had to say that I LOVE your quote. My hubby and I are both engineers, as are 90% of our friends. We live in a NASA town, so there's a lot of us. I can sooooo relate to the quote. Thanks for the laugh! :lol:

Sorry, off topic!

gfp Enthusiast

The simple answer is that there is a international definition by the FAO/WHO in the codex alimentarius.

Open Original Shared Link

However one must remember that the FAO is an industry sponsored body and also that the document is pretty meaningless.

Additionally according to the charter:

The Codex Alimentarius Commission

The Codex Alimentarius Commission (CAC) is the main international body concerned with the setting of international food standards. The body was established in 1962 and is jointly funded by the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) and the World Health Organisation (WHO) - currently 75% FAO, 25% WHO. The secretariat of the CAC is based at the headquarters of the FAO in Rome.

Membership is open to any country which is a member of the FAO or WHO and currently numbers 162. Other bodies can have observer status. Membership confers no obligations on countries but enables them to contribute to the development of standards and to have their point of view taken into account. Full details of the organisation’s statutes, rules, procedures and membership are contained in it’s Procedural Manual [1].

1.1 This standard applies to those processed foods which have been specially prepared to meet

the dietary needs of persons intolerant to gluten.

1.2 The standard refers only to the specific provisions related to the special dietary purpose for

which these foods are intended.

1.3 This standard does not apply to foods which in their normal form do not contain gluten.

Hence the definition does not include a corn tortilla for instance which should be naturally gluten-free. It would be in contravention to the code to label frozen peas as gluten free but if they make a corn tortilla and deliberatly add wheat gluten to the limit they can!

2.2.2 For the purpose of this standard, gluten-free means that the total nitrogen content of the

gluten-containing cereal grains used in the product does not exceed 0.05 g per 100 grammes of

these grains on a dry matter basis.

In other words the standard is not fixed so the limit of gluten is different for wheat and rye for instance and even different varieties of wheat since the "gluten-containing cereal grains" have different ratio's of gluten and other proteins but the standard does not take this into account.

In other words it is a completely empty statement. If a manufacturer wishes to discard the other wheat proteins such as glutamine which is NOT gluten then they can use 200 ppm pure gluten in their product and call it gluten free. If they take the whole grain in a common wheat with a 1:1 ratio of gluten to glutamine they can only have 100 ppm... although this itself depends how they define ppm dry matter. In simple terms it depends how the gluten is measured, most commonly in terms of mass hence the different molecular weights of gluten vs glutamine most then be used to 'normalise' the calculation.

3.1 A gluten-free food shall be based on or shall contain:

(a) gluten-containing cereals such as wheat, triticale, rye, barley or oats or their constituents, which have been rendered "gluten-free" according to Section 2.2.2; or

(B) ingredients which do not contain gluten in substitution for the ingredients containing

gluten which are normally used in food of that kind; or

© any mixture of two or more ingredients as in (a) and (B).

Again, the corn tortilla cannot be gluten-free...unless they deliberatly add wheat flour or other gluten????

5.2 A food which naturally has no gluten may not be called "gluten-free"; however, a cereal or a

food product containing a cereal which naturally has no gluten, may be labelled to show that it is

naturally free of gluten and is suitable for use in gluten-free diet.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - xxnonamexx replied to xxnonamexx's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      45

      My journey is it gluten or fiber?

    2. - JoJo0611 posted a topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      0

      Yeast extract

    3. - trents replied to Seabeemee's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      1

      Labs ? Awaiting in person follow up with my GI

    4. - Seabeemee posted a topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      1

      Labs ? Awaiting in person follow up with my GI

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,166
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    rgfeeg
    Newest Member
    rgfeeg
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • xxnonamexx
      Thanks bumped it up and now take all 3 vitamins 2 capsules each with the super b complex at breakfast. I will give it some time to see if I notice a difference. I am going to track my eating daily diary on a myfitness pal app to see if the "claimed" gluten free foods bother me or not.
    • JoJo0611
      Please can anyone help. I was diagnosed on 23rd December and I am trying my best to get my head around all the things to look out for. I have read that yeast extract is not to be eaten by coeliacs. Why? And is this all yeast extract. Or is this information wrong. Thanks. 
    • trents
      Welcome to the celiac.com community, @Seabeemee! The fact that the genetic testing shows you do not have either of the two genes associated with the potential to develop celiac disease (HlA DQ2 and HLA DQ8) pretty much ensures that you do not have celiac disease and the biopsy of the small bowel showing "normal villous architecture" confirms this. But you could have NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity) which would not damage the villous architecture. You could also have SIBO (Small Intestine Bacterial Overgrowth) or H. Pylori infection. Both of these conditions would thrive on carbs and you do say you feel better when you don't eat a lot of carbs. And with your resection of the small bowel, that could be causing it's own problems like you describe. When was that surgery done? You have had over 1 foot of your small bowel removed by that surgery in 2022 so that would certainly challenge digestion and nutrient absorption.  Edited
    • Seabeemee
      My Doctor messaged me that I have no sign of Celiac disease so until I meet with her next week I don’t know what the labs mean. I am being evaluated by my new GI for Celiac disease because of digestive issues (bloating, distention, fullness in mid section, diarrhea).  I also have been diagnosed with GERD and some associated issues hence the endoscopy. I also was diagnosed with NAFLD after an abdominal CT scan in December - which surprises me because I gave up alcohol 5 years ago, workout 5 days a week, cardio / weights and cook from scratch every night. Anecdotally,  I do feel better when I do not eat a lot of carbs and have been staying away from gluten 95% of the time until my follow up.  History: I had an emergency bowel obstruction operation in August 2021 for a double closed loop obstruction, open surgery removed 40 cm of my small intestine, my appendix, cecal valve and illeocectomy. Beside the fact that this put me in the situation of no longer being able to absorb Vitamin B12  from my diet and having to  inject Vit B 12 2x a month, I also became Iron deficient and am on EOD iron to keep my levels high enough to support my Vitamin B12 injections, as well as daily folic acid. I tested positive for pernicious anemia in 2022 but most recently that same test came back negative. Negative Intrinsic Factor. My results from the biopsies showed 2nd part of Duodenum, small bowel Mildly patch increased intraepithelial lymphocytes with intact villious architecture. Comment: Duodenal biopsies with normal villous architecture and increased intrepithelial lymphocytes (Marsh I lesion) are found in 1-3% of patients undergoing duodenal biopsy, and an association with celiac disease is well established however the specificity remains low. Similar histologic findings may be seen in H pylori gastritis, NSAID and other medication use including olmesartan, bacterial overgrowth, tropical sprue and certain autoimmune disorders. So my GI ordered Labs for Celiac confirmation: Sorry I couldn’t upload a photo or pdf so typed below: TEST NAME                               IN RANGE and/or RESULTS RESULTS:  IMMUNOGLOBULIN A :           110 GLIADIN (DEAMIDATED) AB (IGG, IGA)                            <1.0 GLIADIN (DEAMIDATED) AB (IGA)                                     <1.0 GLIADIN (DEAMIDATED) AB (IGG)                                    <1.0 TISSUE TRANSGLUTAMINASE ANTIBODY, IGG, IGA TISSUE TRANSGLUTAMINASE AB, IGG                                     <1.0 TISSUE TRANSGLUTAMINASE AB, IGA                                     <1.0 INTERPRETATION: <15.0 ANTIBODY NOT DETECTED  > OR = 15.0 ANTIBODY DETECTED RESULTS: HLA TYPING FOR CELIAC DISEASE INTERPRETATION (note The patient does not have the HLA-DQ associated with celiac disease variants) More than 97% of celiac patients carry either HLA-DQ2 (DQA1*05/DQB1*02) or HLA-DQ8 (DQA1*03/DQB1*0302) or both. Genetic counseling as needed. HLA DQ2 : NEGATIVE HLA D08: NEGATIVE HLA VARIANTS DETECTED: HLA DA1* : 01 HLA DA1* : 05 HLA DQB1*: 0301 HLA DQB1*: 0501 RESULTS REVIEWED BY: Benjamin A Hilton, Ph.D., FACMG I appreciate any input, thank you.         
    • trents
      Let me hasten to add that if you will be undergoing an endoscopy/biopsy, it is critical that you do not begin efforts to reduce gluten beforehand. Doing so will render the results invalid as it will allow the small bowel lining to heal and, therefore, obscure the damage done by celiac disease which is what the biopsy is looking for.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.