Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Gluten Free Ppm?


Modism

Recommended Posts

Modism Newbie

Okay, so I wanted to delete this post since I found my answer but I don't know how....

So, does "gluten free" mean the same thing in Canada and the USA?

My mother said that it's 20ppm, but I have found conflicting sources.

All my gluten free purchases state: made in a gluten free facility. Does this mean they are 100% gluten free? What about cross contamination at the source of the flours?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



MySuicidalTurtle Enthusiast

Instead of deleting this could you tell us what you found out?

psawyer Proficient

In Canada, by law, a product labelled as, or represented to be, "gluten free" can not contain wheat, rye, barley, oats, or any derivative part thereof, period. There is no maximum level, it simply can not be there at all, even if the proteins are processed out somehow, such as by distillation.

There is no legally regulated definition of the term in the USA, although FALCPA requires that one be developed and proposed by 2008.

In Europe, the rules are different, and a product which contains as much as 200 ppm can be labelled "gluten free" under at least some circumstances.

Anything made in a gluten free facility will not contain any intentional gluten at all, but cross contamination is still a very, very slight possibility--an ingredient could be contaminated prior to entering the facility.

TCA Contributor

Psawyer,

Just had to say that I LOVE your quote. My hubby and I are both engineers, as are 90% of our friends. We live in a NASA town, so there's a lot of us. I can sooooo relate to the quote. Thanks for the laugh! :lol:

Sorry, off topic!

gfp Enthusiast

The simple answer is that there is a international definition by the FAO/WHO in the codex alimentarius.

Open Original Shared Link

However one must remember that the FAO is an industry sponsored body and also that the document is pretty meaningless.

Additionally according to the charter:

The Codex Alimentarius Commission

The Codex Alimentarius Commission (CAC) is the main international body concerned with the setting of international food standards. The body was established in 1962 and is jointly funded by the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) and the World Health Organisation (WHO) - currently 75% FAO, 25% WHO. The secretariat of the CAC is based at the headquarters of the FAO in Rome.

Membership is open to any country which is a member of the FAO or WHO and currently numbers 162. Other bodies can have observer status. Membership confers no obligations on countries but enables them to contribute to the development of standards and to have their point of view taken into account. Full details of the organisation’s statutes, rules, procedures and membership are contained in it’s Procedural Manual [1].

1.1 This standard applies to those processed foods which have been specially prepared to meet

the dietary needs of persons intolerant to gluten.

1.2 The standard refers only to the specific provisions related to the special dietary purpose for

which these foods are intended.

1.3 This standard does not apply to foods which in their normal form do not contain gluten.

Hence the definition does not include a corn tortilla for instance which should be naturally gluten-free. It would be in contravention to the code to label frozen peas as gluten free but if they make a corn tortilla and deliberatly add wheat gluten to the limit they can!

2.2.2 For the purpose of this standard, gluten-free means that the total nitrogen content of the

gluten-containing cereal grains used in the product does not exceed 0.05 g per 100 grammes of

these grains on a dry matter basis.

In other words the standard is not fixed so the limit of gluten is different for wheat and rye for instance and even different varieties of wheat since the "gluten-containing cereal grains" have different ratio's of gluten and other proteins but the standard does not take this into account.

In other words it is a completely empty statement. If a manufacturer wishes to discard the other wheat proteins such as glutamine which is NOT gluten then they can use 200 ppm pure gluten in their product and call it gluten free. If they take the whole grain in a common wheat with a 1:1 ratio of gluten to glutamine they can only have 100 ppm... although this itself depends how they define ppm dry matter. In simple terms it depends how the gluten is measured, most commonly in terms of mass hence the different molecular weights of gluten vs glutamine most then be used to 'normalise' the calculation.

3.1 A gluten-free food shall be based on or shall contain:

(a) gluten-containing cereals such as wheat, triticale, rye, barley or oats or their constituents, which have been rendered "gluten-free" according to Section 2.2.2; or

(B) ingredients which do not contain gluten in substitution for the ingredients containing

gluten which are normally used in food of that kind; or

© any mixture of two or more ingredients as in (a) and (B).

Again, the corn tortilla cannot be gluten-free...unless they deliberatly add wheat flour or other gluten????

5.2 A food which naturally has no gluten may not be called "gluten-free"; however, a cereal or a

food product containing a cereal which naturally has no gluten, may be labelled to show that it is

naturally free of gluten and is suitable for use in gluten-free diet.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Rogol72 replied to Butch68's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      2

      Guinness, can you drink it?

    2. - Scott Adams replied to Butch68's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      2

      Guinness, can you drink it?

    3. - MogwaiStripe replied to Midwestern's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      15

      Gluten Issues and Vitamin D

    4. - Butch68 posted a topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      2

      Guinness, can you drink it?


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,225
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Vickie Rogers
    Newest Member
    Vickie Rogers
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Rogol72
      Hey @Butch68, I also have dermatitis herpetiformis but don't suffer from it anymore. I used to drink Guinness too but I drink Cider now when out on social occasions. I assume you are in Ireland or the UK. If it's any good to you ... 9 White Deer based in Cork brew a range of gluten-free products including a gluten-free Stout. I'm not sure if they are certified though. https://www.9whitedeer.ie/ I haven't come across any certified gluten-free stouts this side of the pond.
    • Scott Adams
      This is a very common question, and the most important thing to know is that no, Guinness is not considered safe for individuals with coeliac disease. While it's fascinating to hear anecdotes from other coeliacs who can drink it without immediate issues, this is a risky exception rather than the rule. The core issue is that Guinness is brewed from barley, which contains gluten, and the standard brewing process does not remove the gluten protein to a level safe for coeliacs (below 20ppm). For someone like you who experiences dermatitis herpetiformis, the reaction is particularly significant. DH is triggered by gluten ingestion, even without immediate gastrointestinal symptoms. So, while you may not feel an instant stomach upset, drinking a gluten-containing beer like Guinness could very well provoke a flare-up of your skin condition days later. It would be a gamble with a potentially uncomfortable and long-lasting consequence. Fortunately, there are excellent, certified gluten-free stouts available now that can provide a safe and satisfying alternative without the risk.
    • MogwaiStripe
      Interestingly, this thought occurred to me last night. I did find that there are studies investigating whether vitamin D deficiency can actually trigger celiac disease.  Source: National Institutes of Health https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7231074/ 
    • Butch68
      Before being diagnosed coeliac I used to love Guinness. Being made from barley it should be something a coeliac shouldn’t drink. But taking to another coeliac and they can drink it with no ill effects and have heard of others who can drink it too.  is this everyone’s experience?  Can I drink it?  I get dermatitis herpetiformis and don’t get instant reactions to gluten so can’t try it to see for myself. 
    • trents
      NCGS does not cause damage to the small bowel villi so, if indeed you were not skimping on gluten when you had the antibody blood testing done, it is likely you have celiac disease.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.