Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):
  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Someone Help


Linda56

Recommended Posts

Linda56 Apprentice

Ok I got my result on the test I sent to Entrolab. I went and read the link explaining about the range. I sent off for only the test that was 99.00 the antibody IGA I think it was. Anyway they say the test was postive. But my number was only 20. Reading it says you can be from 10 to 350. I read what they referred to as an explaination of this. That some people are producing more of the antibody from the blood. I don't really see how having a 20 is as important as having say a 100 number. I am assuming that at a 20 I am not having as much damage to the intestine as some with higher amounts. I am suppose to have a colonoscopy and was thinking of asking for a biopsy. I had the blood test for celiac a couple years ago that was negative. If I am not having a lot of damage in the intestine wouldn't a biopsy show anything really. I am kind of puzzled by this really and not sure what to do. If I don't have any damage and just a little high in the antibodies. I also have perinious anemia which I am told my body doesn't absorb b-12 in the intestine and I wonder if this could somehow be related. Anyway if I don't have a real problem to worry about this I don't want to put myself on a strict diet. Did anyone get thier test showing this low amount. Or if you have a better understanding of this. I am not going to be showing my doctor these results as I know he will not value it. Its like pulling teeth with him and an open mind. Thanks Linda


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



CarlaB Enthusiast

Anything over 10 is positive. My daughter eats gluten free with a 30. Mine was a 60. You need to remember, you are reacting to the gluten. Your number is double what normal is. You must have had health problems that prompted you to do the test. I tell my daughter that she should be happy she discovered she was having the reaction before she had the damage and health problems I did!! I guess theoretically the numbers could go up to 350, but I've never heard of them so high! Has anyone else?

edit, the anemia can definately be caused by malabsorption.

2kids4me Contributor

Daughter had the lowest # to be considered positive on blood work. Biopsies showed damage (subtotal villous atrophy). The GI said it is not common but does happen that the blood levels dont give any clue as to the intestinal damage.

Inability to absorb B 12 is common on celiac damage.

If you are positive - you are positive. Somone with a higher # doesnt necessarily mean they have more damage - it may be a reflection of their particular immune system and amount of gluten they ingest daily.

Linda56 Apprentice

Thank you both for giving me your thoughts about this. I guess I will go ahead and ask for a biopsy. The only reason I wanted to do this test is that I have loose bowel all the time and always have. I thought maybe its part of the problem. I also have inner ear disease that took away my balance function. I have never had a diagnosis on this some doctors have said Autoimmune inner ear disease which basically is where you get ear infection and your body goes in hyper mode and decides to kill good cells along with the bad. But I have also been told it was from toxic exposure from using toulene for years in a job I use to do. Some on a ear board I visit have found they have Celiacs and when they stop eating gluten their hearing gets better. I don't have the hearing loss part which also goes against the AIED diagnosis. So I have been looking for things that others have found and trying to follow up on them to see if I could find answers on my own about a couple different things. My mother also has perinious anemia which can be hereditary.

thanks again Linda

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - nanny marley replied to wellthatsfun's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      4

      nothing has changed

    2. - trents replied to Scott Adams's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      46

      Supplements for those Diagnosed with Celiac Disease

    3. - trents replied to Woodster991's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      10

      Is it gluten?

    4. - RMJ replied to wellthatsfun's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      4

      nothing has changed

    5. - asaT replied to wellthatsfun's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      4

      nothing has changed

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,342
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Muhammad
    Newest Member
    Muhammad
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.6k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • nanny marley
      I agree there I've tryed this myself to prove I can't eat gluten or lactose and it sets me back for about a month till I have to go back to being very strict to settle again 
    • trents
      You may also need to supplement with B12 as this vitamin is also involved in iron assimilation and is often deficient in long-term undiagnosed celiac disease.
    • trents
      @par18, no, Scott's use of the term "false negative" is intentional and appropriate. The "total IGA" test is not a test used to diagnose celiac disease per se. The IGA immune spectrum response encompasses more than just celiac disease. So, "total IGA" refers to the whole pie, not just the celiac response part of it. But if the whole pie is deficient, the spectrum of components making it up will likely be also, including the celiac disease response spectrum. In other words, IGA deficiency may produce a tTG-IGA score that is negative that might have been positive had there not been IGA deficiency. So, the tTG-IGA negative score may be "false", i.e, inaccurate, aka, not to be trusted.
    • RMJ
      This may be the problem. Every time you eat gluten it is like giving a booster shot to your immune system, telling it to react and produce antibodies again.
    • asaT
      Scott, I am mostly asymptomatic. I was diagnosed based on high antibodies, low ferritin (3) and low vitamin D (10). I wasn't able to get in for the biopsy until 3 months after the blood test came back. I was supposed to keep eating gluten during this time. Well why would I continue doing something that I know to be harmful for 3 more months to just get this test? So I did quit gluten and had the biopsy. It was negative for celiacs. I continued gluten free with iron supps and my ferritin came back up to a reasonable, but not great level of around 30-35.  Could there be something else going on? Is there any reason why my antibodies would be high (>80) with a negative biopsy? could me intestines have healed that quickly (3 months)?  I'm having a hard time staying gluten free because I am asymptomatic and i'm wondering about that biopsy. I do have the celiacs gene, and all of the antibody tests have always come back high. I recently had them tested again. Still very high. I am gluten free mostly, but not totally. I will occasionally eat something with gluten, but try to keep to a minimum. It's really hard when the immediate consequences are nil.  with high antibodies, the gene, but a negative biopsy (after 3 months strict gluten-free), do i really have celiacs? please say no. lol. i think i know the answer.  Asa
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.