Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Celiac Tests


Judithg

Recommended Posts

Judithg Rookie

Hi, I'm new to this board, but not completely new to living gluten-free. Several years ago I tested positive for gluten intolerance during some routine allergy testing. However, when I was tested for celiac disease (blood tests and endoscopy), the results were negative. I went on a gluten-free diet anyway, because I felt better without gluten. But because I wasn't celiac, I wasn't always careful. Whenever I would cheat a little bit, I didn't feel that bad. But if I started eating wheat everyday, I would get sick again (digestive problems, headaches, fatigue). So I was fairly careful but not strict. For the past year, I've had terrible digestive problems. When they started I realized that a couple of foods I was eating regularly had hidden gluten in them. I tried to be stricter with my diet, and I would get better than get worse again. Sometimes getting worse was directly traceable to eating some hidden gluten. Since there are more accurate tests now than there were when I was first tested for celiac, the doctor tested me again. However, he told me I didn't need to do a gluten challenge. Again I tested negative for celiac. Now I'm wondering if the fact that I was essentially gluten-free at the time of the test may have affected the results. I suppose I should just be as strict as possible about gluten and not worry about diagnosis, but I really would like some closure on the issue.

So how accurate can the test be if you're gluten-free at the time? Do people test negative sometimes for years than eventually test positive? Should I just give up on finding the answer and maintain a strict gluten-free diet?

Sorry this is long--I appreciate your feedback!!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



celiacfreeman Contributor

yes you have to be have it in your system to get proper diag.

Also make sure they run the tTG test that mayo clinic recommends.

Judithg Rookie

Yep, it seems that my doc didn't quite do this right. The day that he gave me the order for the tests, he said just to go ahead and have them done that day. I knew I hadn't had any gluten for quite some time, but he said it wouldn't matter. And the two tests were fairly expensive, even after my insurance kicked in their portion. This is so frustrating! I guess I either have to have the tests done again, or I just have to go forward not knowing whether I have celiac disease or not.

mcalister14 Rookie

In fact our small intestine heals rather quickly after going gluten-free. I read an article on this site suggesting that in order to receive an accurate diagnosis, one must be eating foods with gluten for 3-6 months prior to biopsy. That sounds like such a long time though!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,198
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Joanne01
    Newest Member
    Joanne01
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      They may want to also eliminate other possible causes for your symptoms/issues and are doing additional tests.  Here is info about blood tests for celiac disease--if positive an endoscopy where biopsies of your intestinal villi are taken to confirm is the typical follow up.    
    • Scott Adams
      In the Europe the new protocol for making a celiac disease diagnosis in children is if their tTg-IgA (tissue transglutaminase IgA) levels are 10 times or above the positive level for celiac disease--and you are above that level. According to the latest research, if the blood test results are at certain high levels that range between 5-10 times the reference range for a positive celiac disease diagnosis, it may not be necessary to confirm the results using an endoscopy/biopsy: Blood Test Alone Can Diagnose Celiac Disease in Most Children and Adults TGA-IgA at or Above Five Times Normal Limit in Kids Indicates Celiac Disease in Nearly All Cases No More Biopsies to Diagnose Celiac Disease in Children! May I ask why you've had so many past tTg-IgA tests done, and many of them seem to have been done 3 times during short time intervals?    
    • trents
      @JettaGirl, "Coeliac" is the British spelling of "celiac". Same disease. 
    • JettaGirl
      This may sound ridiculous but is this supposed to say Celiacs? I looked up Coeliacs because you never know, there’s a lot of diseases related to a disease that they come up with similar names for. It’s probably meant to say Celiacs but I just wanted to confirm.
    • JoJo0611
      I was told it was to see how much damage has been caused. But just told CT with contrast not any other name for it. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.