Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Villous Atrophy


Helena

Recommended Posts

Helena Contributor

Some of this is repetitive from another post . . . but I have a new question . . .

My biopsy has been cancelled . . . GI doctor says since there is a slight risk in my case (allergens in the drugs . . . I don't want to do it without drugs) it isn't necessary. He asked me what I would do if the test was negative and I would go gluten free regardless so he suggested we cancel the whole thing . . . but he is referring me to a dietician and will see me in a few months to see how I'm doing on the diet.

I agreed to cancel the test but am now having second thoughts.

I *don't* want to go on gluten again . . . but I *do* want to know how my villi are doing.

So my question is: would someone like me (I'm 30) who has probably had celiac all her life but has been on a wheat free diet for 3-4 years and on a nearly gluten free diet for a few years be likely to have nearly normal villi? Or is it likely that I would have some villous atrophy still? (I did have a positive tTG test)

I have mild GI symptoms with gluten + tiredness. Plus I have *major* dental enamel defects (which my dentist has always figured has been from antibiotic use) and I've always been thin and have to snack frequently.

I'm getting some nutritional blood tests . . . if I don't have any nutritional deficiencies does that mean my villi are probably okay by now?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Guhlia Rising Star

Enterolab's stool test can tell you whether or not you're absorbing nutrients (I think). Check into that. It may be a much safer alternative. While it won't tell you if you have villous atrophy, it will report if there are any problems.

gfp Enthusiast

Firstly I doubt a nearly gluten free diet will affect your biopsy.... you only need 1 crumb thiough it may make it harder to find a good sample.

Secondly why not just get a full celiac panel?

Finally if you want to know how your villi are doing then you can have a biopsy without drugs, I for one wouldn't take the amnesiac cocktail they give and my biopsy was drug free excepting lidocaine local spray on my throat and this was 10 yrs ago with an old style endoscope which was at least 2x the thickness of the modern ones.

Helena Contributor

Thanks for the suggestions . . . enterolab is out at the moment. . . I can't afford it. I'm getting some tests for nutritional deficiencies though.

I did find out on my last visit to the GI that he *did* run the full celiac panel (I should change my signature). . . EMA was negative. I asked him whether it would be worth our while to repeat the blood test since he put me back on barley for awhile and he did . . . so before I do anything, I'll wait until I get those results back.

My doctor initially suggested that we do the GI procedure without the drugs . . . but I have serious gagging issues and some problems with swallowing (those old style Tylenol pills really hurt on the way down. I need to eat meat with water by my side because it sticks in my throat.) But perhaps I'd be okay if I had some topical anaesthetic applied . . .

gfp Enthusiast
Thanks for the suggestions . . . enterolab is out at the moment. . . I can't afford it. I'm getting some tests for nutritional deficiencies though.

I did find out on my last visit to the GI that he *did* run the full celiac panel (I should change my signature). . . EMA was negative. I asked him whether it would be worth our while to repeat the blood test since he put me back on barley for awhile and he did . . . so before I do anything, I'll wait until I get those results back.

My doctor initially suggested that we do the GI procedure without the drugs . . . but I have serious gagging issues and some problems with swallowing (those old style Tylenol pills really hurt on the way down. I need to eat meat with water by my side because it sticks in my throat.) But perhaps I'd be okay if I had some topical anaesthetic applied . . .

I won't pretend its pleasant...it's not BUT I personally (as someone with severe gagging, I haven't seen a dentist in 10 yrs) would prefer not to have the ketamine cocktail at all.

Its still unpleasant, you just don't remember it... (immediately..I'm waiting for peoples artificially repressed memories to start coming out in 5-10 yrs....)

Nancym Enthusiast

Your doctor put you on Barley when you're a diagnosed celiac? What on earth for?

Ursa Major Collaborator
Your doctor put you on Barley when you're a diagnosed celiac? What on earth for?

That's what I was thinking. Anyway, your doctor can't put you on anything. If you refuse to do it, what can he do?

I hope you're completely gluten-free now!

Getting nutrient levels checked is a good idea, really, seeing how you absorb them will also tell you how your bowels are doing.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Helena Contributor

Well, my doctor was originally going to do the biopsy because the blood tests were inconclusive (i.e. tTG positive--"barely positive" he said in my last appt.; antigliadins and EMA negative). But he expected them all to be negative on account of my nearly gluten free diet.

So I went back on barley for the purposes of being diagnosed; but I raised a number of issues with the test (innacuracy . . . especially given the fact that barley is a low gluten grain; potential allergy issues with the meds.) At that point he asked me what I would do if the biopsy is negative . . . I said I would go gluten free anyways. So he said he was fine with a degree of uncertainty and since I wouldn't be doing anything different he would prefer not to take any risks. He will continue to follow my progress and referred me to a dietician. (He didn't, however, order any nutritional tests . . . I didn't ask him though because another doctor did that for me already :) I like that particular doctor! The only thing he didn't order is a bone scan and a test for vitamin D which I'll look into in the near future.

Yep, I'm going gluten free . . . or am attempting to. (Haven't thrown out wooden cutting boards, etc. yet, but will soon . . . haven't looked into my cosmetic products. Am not sure about my spices. But other than that, I'm doing everything right, I think.)

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,201
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Judy Wysocki
    Newest Member
    Judy Wysocki
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      NCGS does not cause damage to the small bowel villi so, if indeed you were not skimping on gluten when you had the antibody blood testing done, it is likely you have celiac disease.
    • Scott Adams
      I will assume you did the gluten challenge properly and were eating a lot of gluten daily for 6-8 weeks before your test, but if not, that could be the issue. You can still have celiac disease with negative blood test results, although it's not as common:  Clinical and genetic profile of patients with seronegative coeliac disease: the natural history and response to gluten-free diet: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5606118/  Seronegative Celiac Disease - A Challenging Case: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9441776/  Enteropathies with villous atrophy but negative coeliac serology in adults: current issues: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34764141/  Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If your symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet it would likely signal NCGS.
    • Xravith
      I'm very confused... My blood test came out negative, I checked all antibodies. I suppose my Total IgA levels are normal (132 mg/dl), so the test should be reliable. Still, I'm not relieved as I can't tolerate even a single biscuit. I need to talk to my doctor about whether a duodenal biopsy is necessary. But it is really possible to have intestinal damage despite having a seronegative results? I have really strong symptoms, and I don't want to keep skipping university lectures or being bedridden at home.
    • Scott Adams
      They may want to also eliminate other possible causes for your symptoms/issues and are doing additional tests.  Here is info about blood tests for celiac disease--if positive an endoscopy where biopsies of your intestinal villi are taken to confirm is the typical follow up.    
    • Scott Adams
      In the Europe the new protocol for making a celiac disease diagnosis in children is if their tTg-IgA (tissue transglutaminase IgA) levels are 10 times or above the positive level for celiac disease--and you are above that level. According to the latest research, if the blood test results are at certain high levels that range between 5-10 times the reference range for a positive celiac disease diagnosis, it may not be necessary to confirm the results using an endoscopy/biopsy: Blood Test Alone Can Diagnose Celiac Disease in Most Children and Adults TGA-IgA at or Above Five Times Normal Limit in Kids Indicates Celiac Disease in Nearly All Cases No More Biopsies to Diagnose Celiac Disease in Children! May I ask why you've had so many past tTg-IgA tests done, and many of them seem to have been done 3 times during short time intervals?    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.