Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

New To This - Very Confused


shawnw

Recommended Posts

shawnw Newbie

Hi - I am new here and have a few questions. My 19 month old is having the biopsy done next week. I never even heard of celiac so when the doctor told me this, I started looking into it but I'm confused about all the discussions on blood work. I have searched all the messages and still have questions. Here are my main questions:

If she has the biopsy, do I have to have further blood work done? Are the biopsy results definitive? Should I then ask for any other blood work? Is there anything else I should ask for?

A little history - My daughter was a preemie (33 weeks) and was totally fine until 15 months old. She didn't have any symptoms at all while she was an infant - she nursed and I started solids at 7 months. No reflux. She nursed until she was 16 months (although it was just once a day at this point). At her 15 month appt., the doctor said she needed to gain weight because she was only 19 pounds. I was told to give her Pediasure and she wouldn't take it. She began refusing food even though she used to be a great eater. She was on home health services for 8 weeks, began spitting up and swallowing it, bad burning rash in her diaper area, not eating well, etc. I switched Peds, she sent me to a Ped GI and he ran the following tests - blood, stool and an upper GI study. He said they were all fine except that her IgA was low (17). I don't know which one he tested or what it even means. He explained that "basically I can't rely on her blood work" so we are doing the biopsy.

She doesn't seem to have a lot of the symptoms that other kids have but she is so young that I have no idea whether she is in pain anywhere.

Thanks.

Shawn


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Guest cassidy

Sorry you and your daughter are going through this.

Here is the deal on testing. If you have a blood test and you test positive - even just a little, then you have celiac. If you test negative then you can't rule it out because the blood test is only about 50% accurate.

If the biopsy is positive, then you have celiac. The issue is that the damage is likely in "pockets" and if they don't take enough samples there could be damage around the corner that they didn't catch. Also, if your blood test is negative a biopsy will likely be negative.

It is a bit fuzzy why some people have damage that shows up in a blood test or biopsy and other people don't. Maybe the people who don't show damage aren't that sick yet, maybe they have gluten intolerance and not celiac but the answer is still the same - they need to go on the diet.

I'm not sure what it means if the blood work is low. Hopefully, someone will know the answer to that.

Please just remember that the tests don't always show celiac or a problem with gluten. If you try the diet and she seems to want to eat more/seems to feel better, then it probably makes sense for her to be on the diet regardless of the test results. The diet certainly wouln't hurt her so there would be no reason not to try it even if the biopsy wasn't conclusive. Doctors don't always know a lot about diagnosing celiac so I would ask questions and confirm the info with people here who have been through this.

Good luck and I hope she feels better.

tarnalberry Community Regular
If she has the biopsy, do I have to have further blood work done? Are the biopsy results definitive? Should I then ask for any other blood work? Is there anything else I should ask for?

Testing, for most things, but especially celiac, is never definitive. None of the testing for celiac is definitive. There are false negatives for all of the tests, though false positives are truely next to impossible, assuming a broader view of celiac than many doctor's take.

Most doctors view the biopsy as the end-all-be-all. If there's, damage, it's celiac; if there's not damage, it's not celiac. That's because that is how the condition has been defined, historically. The problem is that plenty of people still have serological and physical reactions to gluten even if a biopsy hasn't noted damage. Why? Perhaps the damage in the intestine is patchy, and the biopsy only took a few samples and didn't happen to sample the damaged areas. (I think of this one as a probability and timing issue.) Perhaps the damage in the intestines isn't severe, and the lab tech or doctor reading the slides determines that there isn't enough damage to count as celiac, in comparison to whatever standard they are holding the slide to ideally look like. (I think of this one as an expectations issue.) Trouble is, reading blood work can have the same problem - you are dependent on there being enough damage to the intestines that the antibodies can get through the intestines into the bloodstream and register higher than the expectations that the lab has set for a positive.

So, it's a qualitative evaluation of all the results tests available and realistic to run. And dietary response is a valid test as well, that needs to be included in that evaluation. Under two years, the blood tests are pretty unreliable, so they do often go directly to a biopsy, but there may not yet be enough damage to show up as celiac. So I would hope that they would also ask you do to a dietary trial, would look at running complimentary tests (vitamin deficiencies), and re-run tests in a year, even if you keep her gluten-free.

The IgA being low (17) doesn't tell you anything unless you know what IgA it is. I'd guess it's total IgA - did he say that she's IgA deficient? In that case, that means that she generally produces less IgA - regardless of what subtype - than the general population. In terms of testing for celiac, that means that the anti-gliandin and anti-tTg IgA tests will show up negative (on the standard reference ranges), even if they were to be positive (for her) because she produces so little IgA no matter what.

shawnw Newbie

Thank you very much for taking the time to respond. I'm glad I asked so I can be better prepared on the day of the biopsy.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      130,133
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    drewsmom01
    Newest Member
    drewsmom01
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.3k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Zuma888
      Thank you for your response. You are right, this is not worth the damage to my thyroid since I know gluten is bad for me anyway. I stopped the challenge and did the IgA and tTG-IGA tests and am waiting for results, although I know it is likely they will be false negative anyway. I figured since I wasn't ever really strict about cross contamination, they might show positive if I do have celiac. I did the genetic testing a few months ago and was positive for DQ8.
    • Scott Adams
      I’m so sorry you’re going through this—it sounds like your body is sending a clear signal that gluten is a major trigger for your Hashimoto’s. The dramatic spike in your anti-TPO (from 50 to 799!) and the severe symptoms you’re experiencing suggest a strong immune reaction, even if celiac testing wasn’t done earlier. While a formal diagnosis would clarify cross-contamination risks, continuing the challenge may not be worth the damage to your thyroid and quality of life, especially since you already know gluten worsens your antibodies and symptoms. If you need answers, you could discuss genetic testing (HLA-DQ2/DQ8 genes) with your doctor—this can rule out celiac predisposition without a gluten challenge. For now, prioritizing your health by quitting gluten again (strictly, given your sensitivity) and supporting gut healing (like probiotics, L-glutamine, or zinc carnosine) might be the wisest path. Your thyroid will thank you!
    • trents
      Well then, I'd say he's making excellent progress. It can take some time for antibody numbers to normalize. Even though new antibodies are no longer being produced, it takes a while for the old ones to be disposed of. Make sure you keep an eye on the alkaline phosphatase levels. It is probably true that is tied to his adolescent growth spurt but it's worth tracking. Thirteen years of elevated liver enzymes was what eventually led to my celiac disease diagnosis. But I was 50 years old by that time and it was my ALT and AST that were mildly elevated all that time, not my alk phos. I just found out last week from an ultrasound that my liver is 20% larger than normal and I'm hoping that is a legacy effect. I have more testing lined up. 
    • CeliacMom79
      Hi. Sorry, his previous levels were >250 and we do not know how high they were. So yes, "off the chart". By 'detectable' I just meant that at 234 we now actually have a number as a baseline that we can measure future labs against. All his other liver test functions have been normal.  Just the elevated ALP. Thank you.
    • NoGlutenCooties
      Hi all I'm looking for a safe place to eat in Wilmington, DE. Any ideas? Thanks Jenny
×
×
  • Create New...