Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

New Labeling Laws


almostnrn

Recommended Posts

almostnrn Explorer

I have been a bit confused about the new labeling laws. I'm thrilled that Wheat must be labeled as an allergen but does that mean the company has done the research on all of the ingredients (such as source of modified food starch) or just obvious sources of wheat? I guess after years of reading labels and those certain ingredients sending off warning bells I'm still a little skittish about trusting companies to do all of the research and disclose all those hidden sources. Thanks for any information you can provide!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



darlindeb25 Collaborator

The labeling law states that they must list the 8 main allergens: milk, egg, peanuts, tree nuts, fish, shellfish, soy, and wheat--yet, that does not mean they must list rye or barley, so watch out for that, it's not generally used in most foods.

Here is a site I posted earlier, take a look: Open Original Shared Link

Also remember that even though the law went into effect early this year, it isn't being totally enforced yet and any of the products produced before 2006 does not need to state the allergens. It's a good law, just not properly put together yet. Calling the company is still your best bet.

almostnrn Explorer

Thanks for the link Deb! I have not been on the message board as frequently as usual and I had missed that post. It sounds to at least be a step in the right direction!

Lisa Mentor

In addition, modified food starch, in the US is generally derived from corn.

RiceGuy Collaborator

Well, I still wouldn't trust just any company to be so careful as to know what all their ingredients are made from. We should be able to expect this of a company specializing in gluten-free foods, but the rest don't seem so trustworthy to me. I know some will say Kraft can be trusted to label properly, and maybe that's true, but I'm not going to leap so far as to believe that every Unilever company is going to do the same. It may be the policy of the parent company, but I keep in mind that the farther down the corporate ladder you go, the more people there are to get aligned with company rules. Just think about the company you work for, and those who work in the various departments and such. I have a family member who was actually working for Kraft, and they'd talk about the kinds of things that went on inside the plant itself. They decided never to eat Kraft products, and this is coming from someone whom isn't gluten-free, and does eat junk foods.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      130,700
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Ksc4kids
    Newest Member
    Ksc4kids
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.3k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Grahamsnaturalworld
      Where can I find a gastro in adelaide who can diagnose refractory celiac disease have seen 3 so far and don't understand the most obvious question, why my celiac symptoms did not resolve on a gluten free diet the symptoms just got worse as it is attacking my nervous system. 
    • ShariW
      I recently traveled to Spain and Portugal. I was with a tour group, they knew I needed to be gluten-free and made sure the kitchens preparing the group meals were aware. But just in case, I took Gliadin-X with me and took it for every evening meal - and most other meals. The one time I got glutened was from lunch early in the trip - had to be from cross-contamination. I had not taken Gliadin-X before that meal, which made for a pretty miserable day. Learned my lesson... 😞 
    • Hummer01
      Hi trents, thanks for the response.  The 2nd opinion doctor said that if my CRP is still elevated at that time, he would advise me to look at Crohns/UC or another autoimmune issue. The colonoscopy I had this year seemed to rule those 2 out for now so he still believed celiac may explain it. No previous doctors have suggested any explanation for it even after calling to tell me it was a concerning result.  I guess it feels tough knowing I have positive blood testing, permissive genetics, and visible duodenum changes... and somehow it's NCGS instead of celiac. I'm still surprised the biopsies came back negative when the doctor was so sure they would be positive.
    • trents
      "He also said that my CRP should return to a normal level at this time if the culprit was inflammation in the small intestine due to celiac." But with if the elevated CRP levels are caused by some other inflammatory process going on in your body? "She also said that my positive EMA isn't valuable because it has "a high false positive rate." Totally wrong! This is a highly accurate test for celiac disease, that requires specialized expertise to perform and interpret, and it is more expensive than other blood tests. It is generally used as a last test to confirm celiac disease after a positive tTG-IgA test. The sensitivity of a test refers to its ability to correctly identify individuals with the condition. For the EMA-IgA blood test, the sensitivity is generally very high, ranging from 90% to 98%. This means that the test can accurately detect celiac disease in a significant percentage of people who have the condition. The specificity of a test refers to its ability to correctly identify individuals without the condition. For the EMA-IgA blood test, the specificity is also high, typically around 95% to 100%. This indicates that the test can effectively rule out celiac disease in individuals who do not have the condition. Taken from the following article: Looking at the whole picture, I am wondering if you are transitioning from NCGS to celiac disease. Some experts in the gluten disorder field believe NCGS can be a precursor to celiac disease.
    • Hummer01
      Hi all, just wanted to post an update.  I have been gluten free for about 1.5 months now and seeing improvement already in the bathroom.  Recently I had a visit with another GI doctor for a 2nd opinion. He said that while my blood tests and scope are not a "slam dunk" for celiac, he believes it's more likely than not that I have it. His advice was to stay with a celiac-level gluten free diet (no CC) for 6-12 months then retest to make sure TTG-IGA is still negative. He also said that my CRP should return to a normal level at this time if the culprit was inflammation in the small intestine due to celiac.  Today I had a follow up with the original GI that performed the scope. She is confident it is NCGS and says I can still have gluten sometimes. When I asked about the visible duodenum damage, she said it is just "irritation" from gluten because the biopsies were negative. She also said that my positive EMA isn't valuable because it has "a high false positive rate."  I guess I'm having trouble reconciling the totally different advice from these 2 GI's. I want to believe the new doctor more at this point because what he said just makes more sense to me, and he gave an actionable timeline for possible next steps. Feeling lost and disappointed at this point and wanted to write it down here in case anyone has input. Thank you.   
×
×
  • Create New...