Jump to content

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Research On Tolerable Amounts Of Gluten

Azzie

By Azzie
in Related Issues & Disorders

Recommended Posts

Azzie Rookie
Azzie
Posted

Hi,

I just wanted to get other opinions on this. On another celiac forum, someone mentioned recent research in which the amount of gluten that most celiacs can tolerate was identified. I think it was 50 mg. I'm not sure. In any case, the person on the other website did an experiment in which he figured out that 50 mg is a sizable amount of crumbs, maybe a quarter teaspoon, big enough to be visible.

So my question is, Is a salad that has only had the croutons picked out of it contaminated or safe?

The experiment he did seems to indicate that it would be safe.

Thanks.

Shirley

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


Carriefaith Enthusiast
Carriefaith
Posted

I personally would not eat a salad that had croutons picked out. I get sick every few months from the "invisible particle", whether it is gluten or something I am allergic to.

larry mac Enthusiast
larry mac
Posted
..... I think it was 50 mg. I'm not sure. In any case, the person ... did an experiment in which he figured out that 50 mg is a sizable amount of crumbs, maybe a quarter teaspoon, big enough to be visible. Shirley

Did it say 50 milligrams (50 mg), or 50 micrograms? 50 milligrams might be 1/4 tsp dry bread crumbs, but 50 micrograms would be one thousand times less than that amount. I heard a doctor speak today and thought it was 50 micrograms.

best regards, lm

tarnalberry Community Regular
tarnalberry
Posted

ditto larrymac - I've heard it in the microgram range (which should be symbolized with ug if there's no access to greek letters, or mcg, but not everyone bothers).

Azzie Rookie
Azzie
Posted
  • Author

test

larry mac Enthusiast
larry mac
Posted
ditto larrymac - I've heard it in the microgram range ....

In that case, I think maybe it would be 2-3 small dry bread crumbs. Just for grins, I'll check Monday, I work in a lab. lm

Azzie Rookie
Azzie
Posted
  • Author

Oh -- well, his post actually said MG but there's no link to the actual research..so I'll have to do some more searching I guess. Maybe it's micrograms then...... (bummer)

If anybody has a link to the research or to any source, please let me know. thanks. I just want to check it out to be sure.

Did it say 50 milligrams (50 mg), or 50 micrograms? 50 milligrams might be 1/4 tsp dry bread crumbs, but 50 micrograms would be one thousand times less than that amount. I heard a doctor speak today and thought it was 50 micrograms.

best regards, lm

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


tarnalberry Community Regular
tarnalberry
Posted

I certainly wouldn't eat a salad with the croutons removed. Why? Because there's going to be contamination you *can't* avoid because you don't know about it that will eat away at that "limit" of how much you can have; you don't want to use up the rest of it or go over that limit with contamination you know you can avoid.

Ursa Major Collaborator
Ursa Major
Posted

Here is a link to the article Scott posted on celiac.com. https://www.celiac.com/st_prod.html?p_prodid=1411

As you can see, it is 50 mg. Personally, I think it was a very small group they studied, some of those people didn't even get gluten, and one had a relapse from 10 mg a day. I wouldn't eat any gluten on purpose, even if it is crumbs, as some people get violent reactions from just one crumb.

This was a short-term study. Who knows how much damage there would be long-term, and how much higher the risk of cancer for instance would be if people would purposely have up to 50 mg of gluten every day.

tarnalberry Community Regular
tarnalberry
Posted

Even if it is 50mg of gluten, consider that one cup of flour is about 125g. Given that gluten makes up somewhere between 8-15% of flour, this all means that this supposed 'tolerable' level is 0.4% of a cup of flour. That's 1/5th of a teaspoon of flour - from all sources of contamination total. A few crumbs is going to go through that much pretty quickly.

psawyer Proficient
psawyer
Posted
I certainly wouldn't eat a salad with the croutons removed. Why? Because there's going to be contamination you *can't* avoid because you don't know about it that will eat away at that "limit" of how much you can have; you don't want to use up the rest of it or go over that limit with contamination you know you can avoid.

I agree with this. While there is evidence to suggest that we may be able to tolerate *some* gluten in our diet, there are so many chances for trace contamination that I would not risk adding anything to that.

Unless you live in a hermetically sealed bubble that you grow all of your own food inside, there are things that are beyond your control, and those may introduce traces of gluten.

What I can control, I do control, and that means avoiding any known gluten source, however small. It does not mean that I assume anything not labelled "gluten-free" has gluten, and it does not mean that I reject anything from a "shared" facility. Heck, my own kitchen is a shared facility, since my wife eats some foods which contain gluten. We take precautions against cross-contamination, but we share the same dishes and utensils--they are well washed after each use.

Guest cassidy
Guest cassidy
Posted

Every time I have gotten sick since going gluten-free (after the first month when I got myself sick because I didn't know what I was doing) it was because of a small amount of gluten that I couldn't even see. It has usually been in restaurants where I order plain meat and veggies that certainly didn't have bread crumbs on them so it had to be cc from the pans they used. So, based on that I would never pick croutons out of a salad or anything like that. I usually don't eat in restaurants because I almost always get sick however I feel great if I make all my own food.

I just wonder how valid any studies are especially since it took me being sick for 28 years to be self-diagnosed. I'm not sure doctors or researchers that don't have celiac really understand it. Maybe some people can have a few crumbs and not get sick, but many of us can't, whether their study says so or not.

Phyllis28 Apprentice
Phyllis28
Posted
Maybe some people can have a few crumbs and not get sick, but many of us can't, whether their study says so or not.

I agree with Cassidy. I couldn't tolerate 50mg of gluten especially since in the study it was given daily. I have found over the years that one mistake makes me a mildly ill but mistakes several days in a row and I will be very ill. I am talking about amounts from cross contamination which would be less than 50mg.

jerseyangel Proficient
jerseyangel
Posted
I agree with this. While there is evidence to suggest that we may be able to tolerate *some* gluten in our diet, there are so many chances for trace contamination that I would not risk adding anything to that.

Unless you live in a hermetically sealed bubble that you grow all of your own food inside, there are things that are beyond your control, and those may introduce traces of gluten.

What I can control, I do control, and that means avoiding any known gluten source, however small. It does not mean that I assume anything not labelled "gluten-free" has gluten, and it does not mean that I reject anything from a "shared" facility. Heck, my own kitchen is a shared facility, since my wife eats some foods which contain gluten. We take precautions against cross-contamination, but we share the same dishes and utensils--they are well washed after each use.

Ditto :) Except substitute "husband" for "wife" :D

Azzie Rookie
Azzie
Posted
  • Author
Here is a link to the article Scott posted on celiac.com. https://www.celiac.com/st_prod.html?p_prodid=1411

As you can see, it is 50 mg. Personally, I think it was a very small group they studied, some of those people didn't even get gluten, and one had a relapse from 10 mg a day. I wouldn't eat any gluten on purpose, even if it is crumbs, as some people get violent reactions from just one crumb.

This was a short-term study. Who knows how much damage there would be long-term, and how much higher the risk of cancer for instance would be if people would purposely have up to 50 mg of gluten every day.

Azzie Rookie
Azzie
Posted
  • Author
Here is a link to the article Scott posted on celiac.com. https://www.celiac.com/st_prod.html?p_prodid=1411

As you can see, it is 50 mg. Personally, I think it was a very small group they studied, some of those people didn't even get gluten, and one had a relapse from 10 mg a day. I wouldn't eat any gluten on purpose, even if it is crumbs, as some people get violent reactions from just one crumb.

This was a short-term study. Who knows how much damage there would be long-term, and how much higher the risk of cancer for instance would be if people would purposely have up to 50 mg of gluten every day.

Azzie Rookie
Azzie
Posted
  • Author

Well, my point in asking was that 99% of the time, I do completely control my own food and therefore I know that I am 100% gluten free. In the 1% of the time where I am in a restaurant and have to trust the staff after explaining that I can't have gluten, it's always possible that there's cc. I figure ordering a salad cuts down on the chances of cc and if the study is true, then even if there was a crumb or 2 maybe it would not matter. I would not be taking in 50 mg daily, only on rare occassions when I eat out, which I try to avoid these days.... However, I will keep telling servers that I can't have any croutons or bread actually touch my food....... One time I asked if there was any wheat in the soup. I was assured there was not & then it was served to me with crackers!! Someone else linked Dr. Peter Green to this study and said that there is more info in his book. I've placed a hold on the book at the library and plan to read it soon...........

Here is a link to the article Scott posted on celiac.com. https://www.celiac.com/st_prod.html?p_prodid=1411

As you can see, it is 50 mg. Personally, I think it was a very small group they studied, some of those people didn't even get gluten, and one had a relapse from 10 mg a day. I wouldn't eat any gluten on purpose, even if it is crumbs, as some people get violent reactions from just one crumb.

This was a short-term study. Who knows how much damage there would be long-term, and how much higher the risk of cancer for instance would be if people would purposely have up to 50 mg of gluten every day.

Ursa Major Collaborator
Ursa Major
Posted

Okay, I get you now. I thought you would purposely eat gluten up to 50 mg a day. I agree that you shouldn't be paranoid about it, and understand your point now.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,331
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    Kristy2026
    Newest Member
    Kristy2026
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.6k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):

  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • knitty kitty
      Desperately need a vitamin D supplement. I've reacted to most brands I've tried.

      By knitty kitty · Posted

      @Jane02, I hear you about the kale and collard greens.  I don't do dairy and must eat green leafies, too, to get sufficient calcium.  I must be very careful because some calcium supplements are made from ground up crustacean shells.  When I was deficient in Vitamin D, I took high doses of Vitamin D to correct the deficiency quickly.  This is safe and nontoxic.  Vitamin D level should be above 70 nmol/L.  Lifeguards and indigenous Pacific Islanders typically have levels between 80-100 nmol/L.   Levels lower than this are based on amount needed to prevent disease like rickets and osteomalacia. We need more thiamine when we're physically ill, emotionally and mentally stressed, and if we exercise like an athlete or laborer.  We need more thiamine if we eat a diet high in simple carbohydrates.  For every 500 kcal of carbohydrates, we need 500-1000 mg more of thiamine to process the carbs into energy.  If there's insufficient thiamine the carbs get stored as fat.  Again, recommended levels set for thiamine are based on minimum amounts needed to prevent disease.  This is often not adequate for optimum health, nor sufficient for people with absorption problems such as Celiac disease.  Gluten free processed foods are not enriched with vitamins like their gluten containing counterparts.  Adding a B Complex and additional thiamine improves health for Celiacs.  Thiamine is safe and nontoxic even in high doses.  Thiamine helps the mitochondria in cells to function.  Thiamine interacts with each of the other B vitamins.  They are all water soluble and easily excreted if not needed. Interesting Reading: Clinical trial: B vitamins improve health in patients with coeliac disease living on a gluten-free diet https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19154566/ Safety and effectiveness of vitamin D mega-dose: A systematic review https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34857184/ High dose dietary vitamin D allocates surplus calories to muscle and growth instead of fat via modulation of myostatin and leptin signaling https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38766160/ Safety of High-Dose Vitamin D Supplementation: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31746327/ Vitamins and Celiac Disease: Beyond Vitamin D https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11857425/ Investigating the therapeutic potential of tryptophan and vitamin A in modulating immune responses in celiac disease: an experimental study https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40178602/ Investigating the Impact of Vitamin A and Amino Acids on Immune Responses in Celiac Disease Patients https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10814138/
    • Jane02
      Desperately need a vitamin D supplement. I've reacted to most brands I've tried.

      By Jane02 · Posted

      Thank you so much @knitty kitty for this insightful information! I would have never considered fractionated coconut oil to be a potential source of GI upset. I will consider all the info you shared. Very interesting about the Thiamine deficiency.  I've tracked daily averages of my intake in a nutrition software. The only nutrient I can't consistently meet from my diet is vitamin D. Calcium is a hit and miss as I rely on vegetables, dark leafy greens as a major source, for my calcium intake. I'm able to meet it when I either eat or juice a bundle of kale or collard greens daily haha. My thiamine intake is roughly 120% of my needs, although I do recognize that I may not be absorbing all of these nutrients consistently with intermittent unintentional exposures to gluten.  My vitamin A intake is roughly 900% (~6400 mcg/d) of my needs as I eat a lot of sweet potato, although since it's plant-derived vitamin A (beta-carotene) apparently it's not likely to cause toxicity.  Thanks again! 
    • knitty kitty
      Desperately need a vitamin D supplement. I've reacted to most brands I've tried.

      By knitty kitty · Posted

      Hello, @Jane02,  I take Naturewise D 3.  It contains olive oil.   Some Vitamin D supplements, like D Drops, are made with fractionated coconut oil which can cause digestive upsets.  Fractionated coconut oil is not the same as coconut oil used for cooking.  Fractionated coconut oil has been treated for longer shelf life, so it won't go bad in the jar, and thus may be irritating to the digestive system. I avoid supplements made with soy because many people with Celiac Disease also react to soy.  Mixed tocopherols, an ingredient in Thornes Vitamin D, may be sourced from soy oil.  Kirkland's has soy on its ingredient list. I avoid things that might contain or be exposed to crustaceans, like Metagenics says on its label.  I have a crustacean/shellfish/fish allergy.  I like Life Extension Bioactive Complete B Complex.  I take additional Thiamine B 1 in the form Benfotiamine which helps the intestines heal, Life Extension MegaBenfotiamine. Thiamine is needed to activate Vitamin D.   Low thiamine can make one feel like they are getting glutened after a meal containing lots of simple carbohydrates like white rice, or processed gluten free foods like cookies and pasta.   It's rare to have a single vitamin deficiency.  The water soluble B Complex vitamins should be supplemented together with additional Thiamine in the form Benfotiamine and Thiamine TTFD (tetrahydrofurfuryl disulfide) to correct subclinical deficiencies that don't show up on blood tests.  These are subclinical deficiencies within organs and tissues.  Blood is a transportation system.  The body will deplete tissues and organs in order to keep a supply of thiamine in the bloodstream going to the brain and heart.   If you're low in Vitamin D, you may well be low in other fat soluble vitamins like Vitamin A and Vitamin K. Have you seen a dietician?
    • Scott Adams
      Desperately need a vitamin D supplement. I've reacted to most brands I've tried.

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      I do not know this, but since they are labelled gluten-free, and are not really a product that could easily be contaminated when making them (there would be not flour in the air of such a facility, for example), I don't really see contamination as something to be concerned about for this type of product. 
    • trents
      Desperately need a vitamin D supplement. I've reacted to most brands I've tried.

      By trents · Posted

      Contact them.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.