Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Diagnosed With Just Celiac Panel?


amarieski

Recommended Posts

amarieski Apprentice

Im newly diagnosed , but as far as I thought the true way to diagnose is through intestinal biopsy correct? I had the celiac panel as far as I know (blood test) and what my doc said was one was normal not sure which, next was above normal and last was abnormally high <_< so what was suggested is gluten free diet, vitamin levels checked next week, referral to gi doc and then retest levels in one month. Im also pregnant so I would assume any internal testing would wait a bit until after the baby arrives. I guess also what I thought was any gluten restraint should wait until after biopsy or internal testing to be accurate so why would they suggest the diet now? and wouldnt that effect a proper diagnosis?

thanks a million

Dee


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



lovegrov Collaborator

First, I am not a doctor or a medical person.

I don't know which of your blood tests were positive, but celiac blood tests are rarely false positive. There's a good chance you have celiac.

Normally you would indeed stay on gluten until the biopsy but the fact that you're pregnant complicates things. Untreated celiac affects your ability to absorb nutrients and vitamins and so has the potential to cause problems with pregnancies. Many women have perfect pregnancies with untreated celiac, but the chance of problems increases. So even without a biopsy, it would seem to me your doctor has given you prudent advice -- go gluten free. If you want to do a challenge and have a biopsy after the pregnancy you can do that.

richard

Rikki Tikki Explorer

I believe the blood panel is enough to be positive for celiac. You are right that if you go gluten free the villi will heal, but you are pregnant and to ensure the baby receives nutrients I think you should remain gluten free. I just don't think the biopsy is necessary to prove you have it. If I had known what I do now about celiac I would have just had the blood test and would not believe the endscopy was necessary, but I was not told the blood was positive until after the biopsy confirmed it for the doctor.

amarieski Apprentice

Thankyou guys very much, my thoughts exactly that bc I am pregnant is why she told me to go gluten free, considering I wasnt sure if the panel was enough, Im sure now through reading again more info that a biopsy just confirms it more. So that puts me a little at rest that the blood tests are enough, I cant see why then after the baby they would tell me to get back on gluten just so they could do a biopsy lol. I already have a daughter and shes great, ultrasounds so far show this child also is just fine so Im thankful, and luckily the baby is taking what he needs from me eitherway so I know why I feel cruddy! only 10 weeks left also so hopefully this diet will help more if naything:)

Thanks so much again

Dee

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,104
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    LeaF67
    Newest Member
    LeaF67
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Wheatwacked
      Normal vitamin D range us from 20 ng/ml to 100 ng/ml.  200 nmol/L is the same as 80ng/ml. Minimum vitamin D is based soley on preventing Rickets and osteomyelitis.  Othe research is considered irrelevant insufficnet proof.   My 25(OH)D level is just over 80 ng/dl.  It took 8 years of 10,000 IU a day to get here because Celiac Disease causes low D.  In 1952 the UK banned all vitamin D supplementation due to a error.  Most of the world followed suit.  In the western world vitamin D deficiency ranges from 40% of the US to 60% in the UK. If you had an office with workspace for 30 to 100 workers, but you were restricted to less than 50 workers, how well would the office run.? A factory worker has 40 ng/ml,  A lifeguard has around 80.  Who's immune system works better? Simultaneously, 1,25(OH)2D3 up- and downregulates more than 1000 genes responsible for cellular proliferation, differentiation, a variety of cellular metabolic activities, antiangiogenesis and apoptosis   https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9919777/      
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @Mpanknin! Questions like that really have no definite answer. Even if you tested a container of it for gluten content, the test results would only be good for that production batch. Assume it has some degree of CC. A more important question might be, how sensitive are you to minor amounts of gluten exposure? 
    • Yvonne Ayers Albers
      I have Celiac, and I just found out that HCTZ has gluten in it, and also makes you severely constipated versus diarrrhea!!  I need another medicene for blood pressure that is certified gluten free, without the 20 ppm, and doesn't cause constipation, please!!
    • sillyac58
      Thanks Wheatwacked. My D is normal. I take B12, B6, and a bone health supplement (I'm 67) that has K1, Calcium, Magnesium, and a bunch of other things. But no thiamine. But I will have my doc add it to my next blood draw. Thanks for the info WW!  
    • Mpanknin
      Wondering if this is gluten free or not. The only ingredients show garlic. Nothing about where it's processed if there's cross-contamination etc. Anybody know?
×
×
  • Create New...