Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Help W/new Labeling Laws?


Tree

Recommended Posts

Tree Rookie

OK, this is kinda embarrassing to admit, but...

Do the new US labeling laws that went into effect last year cover disclosure of the "Big Eight" allergens in ANY amount? I've found the original regulations, written in governmentese, and it seems that any amount of the big 8 needs to be disclosed in common language.

Is this true? If so, that could make my life so much easier. If I could know that spices weren't powdered with wheat flour, it would make a huge difference. After all, who's gonna powder a spice with barley flour?

I'm realizing this has been the norm since January '06!

Who has information about this?

Tree


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Sinenox Apprentice

I've really been wondering this too. I'll read a label that contains questionable ingredients but doesn't have the Contains: Wheat label near the bottom. I know that Barley and Oats and Rye don't have to be labelled so that's another cause for concern. But if the ingredient is wheat-specific and the container doesn't warn of wheat does that make it safe? Is there a possibility that only direct wheat ingrediants need to be considered in the label? Are there some ingredients that we watch out for because there are cross contamination issues as opposed to intentional additions? This would clear up a lot. Thanks.

hathor Contributor

Here are some Q & A's about the law: Open Original Shared Link

Actually it took some time after January 1, 2006, because the law applied to anything LABELLED after that date. But we probably don't have anything older than that about these days ...

The FDA might set up minimum levels of ingredients sufficient to prompt the warning but I haven't heard of them doing that yet. The rulemaking for defining "gluten-free" is currently going on.

The labelling only applied to intentional ingredients. All those labels you see about "processed in the same facility with," etc., are voluntary.

happygirl Collaborator

The food labeling law was passed in 2004 and took effect for foods labelled after Jan 1, 2006, but many companies started before that (i.e., that is why over a year elapsed in between passing and law, to give the companies time to learn and comply).

Yes, any amount of any of the 8 main allergens must be disclosed, which, like you mentioned, includes wheat, but not oats/barley/malt. So, if you see a "modified food starch" and it doesn't state wheat, then it is safe (probably corn starch).

Pure spices (i.e., like in a bottle, from McCormick's) are gluten free. If a food product only has one ingredient (say, rosemary) it is required by law to only be that (it will say "Rosemary" on the front, but won't have an ingredient list on the back, because it is only one ingredient.) Further, McCormick's is a company that will clearly list all gluten ingredients anyways, so you can be doubly sure that their spices are safe. Now, spice packets (say, for a taco mix, or a pasta sauce, etc.) are a different story, and could have a flour in it as a thickener. But, the food labeling laws would apply to it and you would read the label like any other product.

There is a good list of companies that state that they will list all gluten ingredients, so if you read the label on these companies' products, you can feel confident if it does/doesn't contain gluten. Between this and the food labeling law of 2006, life is MUCH easier. (particulary posts #1, 2, and 9 Open Original Shared Link

Hope this helps clarify.

Tree Rookie

Happygirl,

Thank you! Your reply and links were exactly the info I needed.

Life is good.

Tree

Yes, any amount of any of the 8 main allergens must be disclosed, which, like you mentioned, includes wheat, but not oats/barley/malt. So, if you see a "modified food starch" and it doesn't state wheat, then it is safe (probably corn starch).

happygirl Collaborator

Tree,

You are welcome. Its so nice to come here and get the answer you are looking for! The laws and these companies make life infinitely easier in my house.

Laura

Byte Me Apprentice
Yes, any amount of any of the 8 main allergens must be disclosed, which, like you mentioned, includes wheat, but not oats/barley/malt. So, if you see a "modified food starch" and it doesn't state wheat, then it is safe (probably corn starch).

I've noticed a difference lately in some products, reading labels of an older product label vs a newer one, Yoplait strawberry cheesecake yogurt being the latest.. the older version stated "modified food starch" on the label, the newer one stated "modified corn starch". I also saw the same thing on the ingredients of some grilled chicken strips in the lunchmeat aisle... "food starch" vs "wheat starch". It would be nice if *all* companies made the change this way, I like it!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - cristiana replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      10

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    2. - Scott Adams replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      10

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    3. - Rogol72 replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      10

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    4. - Scott Adams replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      10

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    5. - Scott Adams replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,442
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Mprice
    Newest Member
    Mprice
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • cristiana
      It's strange because I'm pretty sure not too long ago I picked up a loaf of bread with B vitamins, but I can't find a single one now.  Probably cutbacks, everyone's trying to save money now!
    • Scott Adams
      Eating grains typically depletes certain B vitamins, so I'm not sure why they decided to fortify with calcium and iron, but hopefully we'll see more B vitamin fortification in gluten-free products going forward.
    • Rogol72
      @HAUS, I was at an event in the UK a few years back. I remember ringing the restaurant ahead to inquire about the gluten free options. All I wanted was a few gluten free sandwiches, which they provided and they were delicious. The gluten-free bread they used was Warbutons white bread and I remember mentioning it on this site before. No harm in trying it once. It's fortified with Calcium and Iron. https://www.warburtonsglutenfree.com/warbs_products/white-loaf/ The only other gluten-free bread that I've come across that is fortified is Schar with Iodized salt, nothing else.
    • Scott Adams
      In the U.S., most regular wheat breads are required to be enriched with certain B-vitamins and iron, but gluten-free breads are not required to be. Since many gluten-free products are not enriched, we usually encourage people with celiac disease to consider a multivitamin.  In the early 1900s, refined white flour replaced whole grains, and people began developing serious vitamin-deficiency diseases: Beriberi → caused by a lack of thiamin (vitamin B1) Pellagra → caused by a lack of niacin (vitamin B3) Anemia → linked to low iron and lack of folate By the 1930s–40s, these problems were common in the U.S., especially in poorer regions. Public-health officials responded by requiring wheat flour and the breads made from it to be “enriched” with thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, and iron. Folic acid was added later (1998) to prevent neural-tube birth defects. Why gluten-free bread isn’t required to be enriched? The U.S. enrichment standards were written specifically for wheat flour. Gluten-free breads use rice, tapioca, corn, sorghum, etc.—so they fall outside that rule—but they probably should be for the same reason wheat products are.
    • Scott Adams
      Keep in mind that there are drawbacks to a formal diagnosis, for example more expensive life and private health insurance, as well as possibly needing to disclose it on job applications. Normally I am in favor of the formal diagnosis process, but if you've already figured out that you can't tolerate gluten and will likely stay gluten-free anyway, I wanted to at least mention the possible negative sides of having a formal diagnosis. While I understand wanting a formal diagnosis, it sounds like she will likely remain gluten-free either way, even if she should test negative for celiac disease (Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If her symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet, it would likely signal NCGS).        
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.