Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Help W/new Labeling Laws?


Tree

Recommended Posts

Tree Rookie

OK, this is kinda embarrassing to admit, but...

Do the new US labeling laws that went into effect last year cover disclosure of the "Big Eight" allergens in ANY amount? I've found the original regulations, written in governmentese, and it seems that any amount of the big 8 needs to be disclosed in common language.

Is this true? If so, that could make my life so much easier. If I could know that spices weren't powdered with wheat flour, it would make a huge difference. After all, who's gonna powder a spice with barley flour?

I'm realizing this has been the norm since January '06!

Who has information about this?

Tree


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Sinenox Apprentice

I've really been wondering this too. I'll read a label that contains questionable ingredients but doesn't have the Contains: Wheat label near the bottom. I know that Barley and Oats and Rye don't have to be labelled so that's another cause for concern. But if the ingredient is wheat-specific and the container doesn't warn of wheat does that make it safe? Is there a possibility that only direct wheat ingrediants need to be considered in the label? Are there some ingredients that we watch out for because there are cross contamination issues as opposed to intentional additions? This would clear up a lot. Thanks.

hathor Contributor

Here are some Q & A's about the law: Open Original Shared Link

Actually it took some time after January 1, 2006, because the law applied to anything LABELLED after that date. But we probably don't have anything older than that about these days ...

The FDA might set up minimum levels of ingredients sufficient to prompt the warning but I haven't heard of them doing that yet. The rulemaking for defining "gluten-free" is currently going on.

The labelling only applied to intentional ingredients. All those labels you see about "processed in the same facility with," etc., are voluntary.

happygirl Collaborator

The food labeling law was passed in 2004 and took effect for foods labelled after Jan 1, 2006, but many companies started before that (i.e., that is why over a year elapsed in between passing and law, to give the companies time to learn and comply).

Yes, any amount of any of the 8 main allergens must be disclosed, which, like you mentioned, includes wheat, but not oats/barley/malt. So, if you see a "modified food starch" and it doesn't state wheat, then it is safe (probably corn starch).

Pure spices (i.e., like in a bottle, from McCormick's) are gluten free. If a food product only has one ingredient (say, rosemary) it is required by law to only be that (it will say "Rosemary" on the front, but won't have an ingredient list on the back, because it is only one ingredient.) Further, McCormick's is a company that will clearly list all gluten ingredients anyways, so you can be doubly sure that their spices are safe. Now, spice packets (say, for a taco mix, or a pasta sauce, etc.) are a different story, and could have a flour in it as a thickener. But, the food labeling laws would apply to it and you would read the label like any other product.

There is a good list of companies that state that they will list all gluten ingredients, so if you read the label on these companies' products, you can feel confident if it does/doesn't contain gluten. Between this and the food labeling law of 2006, life is MUCH easier. (particulary posts #1, 2, and 9 Open Original Shared Link

Hope this helps clarify.

Tree Rookie

Happygirl,

Thank you! Your reply and links were exactly the info I needed.

Life is good.

Tree

Yes, any amount of any of the 8 main allergens must be disclosed, which, like you mentioned, includes wheat, but not oats/barley/malt. So, if you see a "modified food starch" and it doesn't state wheat, then it is safe (probably corn starch).

happygirl Collaborator

Tree,

You are welcome. Its so nice to come here and get the answer you are looking for! The laws and these companies make life infinitely easier in my house.

Laura

Byte Me Apprentice
Yes, any amount of any of the 8 main allergens must be disclosed, which, like you mentioned, includes wheat, but not oats/barley/malt. So, if you see a "modified food starch" and it doesn't state wheat, then it is safe (probably corn starch).

I've noticed a difference lately in some products, reading labels of an older product label vs a newer one, Yoplait strawberry cheesecake yogurt being the latest.. the older version stated "modified food starch" on the label, the newer one stated "modified corn starch". I also saw the same thing on the ingredients of some grilled chicken strips in the lunchmeat aisle... "food starch" vs "wheat starch". It would be nice if *all* companies made the change this way, I like it!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - trents replied to Atl222's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      5

      Increased intraepithelial lymphocytes after 10 yrs gluten-free

    2. - cristiana replied to Atl222's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      5

      Increased intraepithelial lymphocytes after 10 yrs gluten-free

    3. - lizzie42 posted a topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      0

      Low iron and vitamin d

    4. - Scott Adams replied to Atl222's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      5

      Increased intraepithelial lymphocytes after 10 yrs gluten-free

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,214
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Isla M
    Newest Member
    Isla M
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.6k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Cristiana, that sounds like a great approach and I will be looking forward to the results. I am in the same boat as you. I don't experience overt symptoms with minor, cross contamination level exposures so I sometimes will indulge in those "processed on equipment that also processes wheat . . ." or items that don't specifically claim to be gluten free but do not list gluten containing grains in their ingredient list. But I always wonder if I am still experiencing sub acute inflammatory reactions. I haven't had any celiac antibody blood work done since my diagnosis almost 25 years ago so I don't really have any data to go by.   
    • cristiana
      I've been reflecting on this further. The lowest TTG I've ever managed was 4.5 (normal lab reading under 10).  Since then it has gone up to 10.   I am not happy with that.  I can only explain this by the fact that I am eating out more these days and that's where I'm being 'glutened', but such small amounts that I only occasionally react. I know some of it is also to do with eating products labelled 'may contain gluten' by mistake - which in the UK means it probably does! It stands to reason that as I am a coeliac any trace of gluten will cause a response in the gut.  My villi are healed and look healthy, but those lymphocytes are present because of the occasional trace amounts of gluten sneaking into my diet.   I am going to try not to eat out now until my next blood test in the autumn and read labels properly to avoid the may contain gluten products, and will then report back to see if it has helped!
    • lizzie42
      Hi, I posted before about my son's legs shaking after gluten. I did end up starting him on vit b and happily he actually started sleeping better and longer.  Back to my 4 year old. She had gone back to meltdowns, early wakes, and exhaustion. We tested everything again and her ferritin was lowish again (16) and vit d was low. After a couple weeks on supplements she is cheerful, sleeping better and looks better. The red rimmed eyes and dark circles are much better.   AND her Ttg was a 3!!!!!! So, we are crushing the gluten-free diet which is great. But WHY are her iron and vit d low if she's not getting any gluten????  She's on 30mg of iron per day and also a multivitamin and vit d supplement (per her dr). That helped her feel better quickly. But will she need supplements her whole life?? Or is there some other reason she's not absorbing iron? We eat very healthy with minimal processed food. Beef maybe 1x per week but plenty of other protein including eggs daily.  She also says her tummy hurts every single morning. That was before the iron (do not likely a side effect). Is that common with celiac? 
    • Scott Adams
      Celiac disease is the most likely cause, but here are articles about the other possible causes:    
    • xxnonamexx
      Please read: https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-takes-steps-improve-gluten-ingredient-disclosure-foods?fbclid=IwY2xjawPeXhJleHRuA2FlbQIxMABicmlkETFzaDc3NWRaYzlJOFJ4R0Fic3J0YwZhcHBfaWQQMjIyMDM5MTc4ODIwMDg5MgABHrwuSsw8Be7VNGOrKKWFVbrjmf59SGht05nIALwnjQ0DoGkDDK1doRBDzeeX_aem_GZcRcbhisMTyFUp3YMUU9Q
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.