Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Made In Canada


majicbunnies

Recommended Posts

majicbunnies Contributor

I heard Canada has their gluten limit/law, so does that mean that food they ship to the US (made in Canada) follows their law? I know we don't have our ppm limit yet (or whatever it's called), but since it's from Canada, does that mean you can't completely trust it to be 100% gluten-free?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



MySuicidalTurtle Enthusiast

Pretty much anything cannot be trusted to be 100% gluten-free that is produced. This is based on facilities and where they get their ingredients. Plus, if you ever eat out that is a close call, too. If a company tests for gluten and it passes their tests that id good in my opinion but it all depends on your reaction to. It is all so confusing, MajicBunnies!

psawyer Proficient

Here is the applicable Canadian regulation. It applies to food sold in Canada, but food sold outside Canada may not have to adhere to the rule.

Food and Drug Regulation B.24.018

No person shall label, package, sell or advertise a food in a manner likely to create an impression that it is gluten-free unless the food does not contain wheat, including spelt and kamut, or oats, barley, rye or triticale or any part thereof.

Under this rule, gluten-free means gluten-free. It even goes so far as to say that selling "gluten-free oats" is illegal in Canada. It is so restrictive, when taken with another regulation, that many foods that are actually gluten-free may not legally be so labeled.

num1habsfan Rising Star

like psawyer said, if it says gluten-free here in Canada, it is. And if it's stated gluten-free and isn't, even if it's not labelled gluten-free, we can report it to the Canada Food Inspection Agency and they'll look into it. That's how strict the law is. Also if there is any "natural ingredients" or spices it must state whats in it, and give warnings (if applicable) if its made in a facility with eggs/soy/wheat/dairy. Hope that helps.

~ Lisa ~

simplicity66 Explorer

I am in Canada....i use and trust products like Glutanio and El Peto ... El Peto company is based in Kitchener which for me is a 2.5 hour drive...there standards are very high and they have too follow regulations provided by the goverment it is law....through my reading and research i find there is too many product differences between the US and Canada...some products in the US are gluten-free but here in Canada there not.....as for Canada shipping to the US in order for the product to pass inspection if they say gluten-free they and have to be according to Canadain regulations...some products that are shipped from the US to Canada canadains have the same concerns as you...but the golden rule still applies....read labels all the time...products can be changed without notice..

little-c Contributor

What are Canadian laws about cross contamination?

I have a box of Nature's Path Organic Honey'd corn flakes that were made in Canada, but I bought them in the states. There's 'gluten free' labels all over it, but when you read the ingredients panel it says 'produced in a facility that contains peanuts, tree nuts, soy & wheat.'

Is there a gluten parts per million (ppm) limit for Canadian gluten-free products?

psawyer Proficient

I am not aware of any law specifically respecting cross-contamination. As stated above, in Canada, if any part of the prohibited grains is present, the product can not be represented as "gluten-free." Any detectable amount would render the claim false, so it is a question of how sensitive a test is used. There is no "permissible" amount.

When investigating a complaint, my understanding is that the test used by the Canadian Food Inspection Agency has a sensitivity of 20 ppm. But a smaller amount, if proven, would still disqualify the product.

I hope this helps.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,203
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Sarahmegan
    Newest Member
    Sarahmegan
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      NCGS does not cause damage to the small bowel villi so, if indeed you were not skimping on gluten when you had the antibody blood testing done, it is likely you have celiac disease.
    • Scott Adams
      I will assume you did the gluten challenge properly and were eating a lot of gluten daily for 6-8 weeks before your test, but if not, that could be the issue. You can still have celiac disease with negative blood test results, although it's not as common:  Clinical and genetic profile of patients with seronegative coeliac disease: the natural history and response to gluten-free diet: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5606118/  Seronegative Celiac Disease - A Challenging Case: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9441776/  Enteropathies with villous atrophy but negative coeliac serology in adults: current issues: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34764141/  Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If your symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet it would likely signal NCGS.
    • Xravith
      I'm very confused... My blood test came out negative, I checked all antibodies. I suppose my Total IgA levels are normal (132 mg/dl), so the test should be reliable. Still, I'm not relieved as I can't tolerate even a single biscuit. I need to talk to my doctor about whether a duodenal biopsy is necessary. But it is really possible to have intestinal damage despite having a seronegative results? I have really strong symptoms, and I don't want to keep skipping university lectures or being bedridden at home.
    • Scott Adams
      They may want to also eliminate other possible causes for your symptoms/issues and are doing additional tests.  Here is info about blood tests for celiac disease--if positive an endoscopy where biopsies of your intestinal villi are taken to confirm is the typical follow up.    
    • Scott Adams
      In the Europe the new protocol for making a celiac disease diagnosis in children is if their tTg-IgA (tissue transglutaminase IgA) levels are 10 times or above the positive level for celiac disease--and you are above that level. According to the latest research, if the blood test results are at certain high levels that range between 5-10 times the reference range for a positive celiac disease diagnosis, it may not be necessary to confirm the results using an endoscopy/biopsy: Blood Test Alone Can Diagnose Celiac Disease in Most Children and Adults TGA-IgA at or Above Five Times Normal Limit in Kids Indicates Celiac Disease in Nearly All Cases No More Biopsies to Diagnose Celiac Disease in Children! May I ask why you've had so many past tTg-IgA tests done, and many of them seem to have been done 3 times during short time intervals?    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.