Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Gluten Challenge Necessary?


lamp

Recommended Posts

lamp Newbie

I was diagnosed with Celiac disease two months ago (complete villous atrophy on a biopsy) and so we tested my children. My youngest daughter (4) tested positive on the EMA and TTG test. She had been having light colored, sort of fluffy stools about 3 times a day for the last couple of months. Her family doctor said to put her on the gluten free diet while we waited to get in to the pediatric GI doc. Two weeks later, her stools were normal and her behavior (which had been odd) was back to normal. When we finally got in to see the GI, he said we had to do a gluten challenge for two months and then do an endoscopy to be sure of the disease. He admitted that he was 96% sure that she has Celiac disease, but that medicine requires certainty. So, one week into the gluten challenge she's complaining of headaches and tiredness and her stools are light colored again. I very, very strongly feel that we should stop this right now, skip the endoscopy and say that 96% is sure enough. Does anybody have any advice for me out there? I'm particularly worried that in these two months, not only will she become very sick but that one of the side effects of Celiac disease might develop. Is that possible? I have two autoimmune diseases and some neurological damage myself and autoimmune diseases run in my family. What are the risks of keeping her on this gluten filled diet and is it really necessary?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Murph Newbie

Ohhhhh boy 2 months is a long time when only 1 week does that!

And there are many tales of endoscopies not *finding* the damage, tho later celiac is proven. That being said - I don't see why an endoscopy can't be performed now. The villi do NOT repair overnight. It's not like the antibodies in a blood test.

If I were you, I too would worry about celiac-related disorders and I'd say 96% is sure enough. Maybe the genetic test for HLA DQ2/DQ8 would bump it to 100% in the Dr's mind.

Two months is a long time.

shayesmom Rookie
I was diagnosed with Celiac disease two months ago (complete villous atrophy on a biopsy) and so we tested my children. My youngest daughter (4) tested positive on the EMA and TTG test. She had been having light colored, sort of fluffy stools about 3 times a day for the last couple of months. Her family doctor said to put her on the gluten free diet while we waited to get in to the pediatric GI doc. Two weeks later, her stools were normal and her behavior (which had been odd) was back to normal. When we finally got in to see the GI, he said we had to do a gluten challenge for two months and then do an endoscopy to be sure of the disease. He admitted that he was 96% sure that she has Celiac disease, but that medicine requires certainty. So, one week into the gluten challenge she's complaining of headaches and tiredness and her stools are light colored again. I very, very strongly feel that we should stop this right now, skip the endoscopy and say that 96% is sure enough. Does anybody have any advice for me out there? I'm particularly worried that in these two months, not only will she become very sick but that one of the side effects of Celiac disease might develop. Is that possible? I have two autoimmune diseases and some neurological damage myself and autoimmune diseases run in my family. What are the risks of keeping her on this gluten filled diet and is it really necessary?

Yes, medicine requires certainty while completely bypassing common sense at times. That's a big part of the reason why it takes about 9-11 years to get a Celiac diagnosis in this country. We're so busy trying to get ALL of the tests to come up positive before advising a dietary change (that could completely resolve the situation). Meanwhile, I've seen doctors who weren't even close to 96% sure on a diagnosis pull out the prescription pad and start writing. It's mind-blowing at times.

Dietary response is an accurate indicator of the problem. The fact that TTG and EMA also came back positive and that you also have been diagnosed....well, what are the odds that your dd has something completely unrelated? Has the doctor mentioned any other potential diagnosis that absolutely needs to be ruled out? And how long have you gone without being diagnosed? Would you have changed anything on the way to get diagnosed?

This truly is your choice and your decision. You can call the doctor up at any time and tell him what is going on as well as your concerns. You can ask about a diagnosis of gluten sensitivity at the very least for school purposes. That's what I got for my dd because once I found how the diet worked on her....there was just no going back (though in the beginning, I naively thought that we'd challenge at a later time :rolleyes: ). Now, I've read too much about the damaging effects of gluten and I have no problem keeping the whole family gluten-free. My dd, like yours, is also 4. Believe it or not, she is her own best advocate and has no problem saying no to gluten...as well as dairy, soy and eggs....no matter what her classmates are eating. She knows (or actually...remembers) how she felt on those foods and avoids them at all costs. You may want to get your own dd's input on this. Although young, you may be surprised what she has to say once all the info is presented to her.

HTH

kbtoyssni Contributor

Sounds like you're pretty convinced. I would only do the gluten challenge if you needed more proof (beyond what you've already got in blood tests and dietary response) to commit to putting her on a gluten-free diet. Don't do it just to please the doctor.

lamp Newbie
Yes, medicine requires certainty while completely bypassing common sense at times. That's a big part of the reason why it takes about 9-11 years to get a Celiac diagnosis in this country. We're so busy trying to get ALL of the tests to come up positive before advising a dietary change (that could completely resolve the situation). Meanwhile, I've seen doctors who weren't even close to 96% sure on a diagnosis pull out the prescription pad and start writing. It's mind-blowing at times.

Dietary response is an accurate indicator of the problem. The fact that TTG and EMA also came back positive and that you also have been diagnosed....well, what are the odds that your dd has something completely unrelated? Has the doctor mentioned any other potential diagnosis that absolutely needs to be ruled out? And how long have you gone without being diagnosed? Would you have changed anything on the way to get diagnosed?

This truly is your choice and your decision. You can call the doctor up at any time and tell him what is going on as well as your concerns. You can ask about a diagnosis of gluten sensitivity at the very least for school purposes. That's what I got for my dd because once I found how the diet worked on her....there was just no going back (though in the beginning, I naively thought that we'd challenge at a later time :rolleyes: ). Now, I've read too much about the damaging effects of gluten and I have no problem keeping the whole family gluten-free. My dd, like yours, is also 4. Believe it or not, she is her own best advocate and has no problem saying no to gluten...as well as dairy, soy and eggs....no matter what her classmates are eating. She knows (or actually...remembers) how she felt on those foods and avoids them at all costs. You may want to get your own dd's input on this. Although young, you may be surprised what she has to say once all the info is presented to her.

HTH

The doctor did not mention other problems. He just said that he wanted to rule out some other diseases and make sure it wasn't just a wheat allergy. He also said something really odd. He suggested that if the biopsy revealed that her villi weren't too damaged, then maybe she wouldn't need to stick too closely to the diet. That comment goes against everything I've read and made me very nervous about trusting this doctor. I think I must have heard him wrong. Anyway, my GI thinks I've had Celiac at least 15 years. I only recently developed the more "typical" stomach symptoms. Before that it was fatigue, weakness, autoimmune diseases, muscle pain, etc.

Thank you, thank you, thank you! I appreciate this and everyone's advice. I asked my daughter what she wanted to do and she really doesn't like this "test" we're doing and has asked to go back to the gluten free diet. That's it. I'm calling the doctor tomorrow and explaining what's happening. Hopefully he will at least provide a diagnosis of gluten sensitivity for school related things.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,902
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Patty6133
    Newest Member
    Patty6133
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Xravith
      Yes, you are right. Indeed, I’ve been feeling anemic since the beginning of this week, and today I felt horrible during a lecture at the university, I was trembling a lot and felt all my body incredibly heavy, so I had to come back home. I’ll do a blood test tomorrow, but I’m just worried about the possibility of it coming back negative. I’ve been eating two cookies in the morning as my only source of gluten over the past two weeks—could that affect the final result?
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @Judy M! Yes, he definitely needs to continue eating gluten until the day of the endoscopy. Not sure why the GI doc advised otherwise but it was a bum steer.  Celiac disease has a genetic component but also an "epigenetic" component. Let me explain. There are two main genes that have been identified as providing the "potential" to develop "active" celiac disease. We know them as HLA-DQ 2.5 (aka, HLA-DQ 2) and HLA-DQ8. Without one or both of these genes it is highly unlikely that a person will develop celiac disease at some point in their life. About 40% of the general population carry one or both of these two genes but only about 1% of the population develops active celiac disease. Thus, possessing the genetic potential for celiac disease is far less than deterministic. Most who have the potential never develop the disease. In order for the potential to develop celiac disease to turn into active celiac disease, some triggering stress event or events must "turn on" the latent genes. This triggering stress event can be a viral infection, some other medical event, or even prolonged psychological/emotional trauma. This part of the equation is difficult to quantify but this is the epigenetic dimension of the disease. Epigenetics has to do with the influence that environmental factors and things not coded into the DNA itself have to do in "turning on" susceptible genes. And this is why celiac disease can develop at any stage of life. Celiac disease is an autoimmune condition (not a food allergy) that causes inflammation in the lining of the small bowel. The ingestion of gluten causes the body to attack the cells of this lining which, over time, damages and destroys them, impairing the body's ability to absorb nutrients since this is the part of the intestinal track responsible for nutrient absorption and also causing numerous other food sensitivities such as dairy/lactose intolerance. There is another gluten-related disorder known as NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity or just, "gluten sensitivity") that is not autoimmune in nature and which does not damage the small bowel lining. However, NCGS shares many of the same symptoms with celiac disease such as gas, bloating, and diarrhea. It is also much more common than celiac disease. There is no test for NCGS so, because they share common symptoms, celiac disease must first be ruled out through formal testing for celiac disease. This is where your husband is right now. It should also be said that some experts believe NCGS can transition into celiac disease. I hope this helps.
    • Judy M
      My husband has had lactose intolerance for his entire life (he's 68 yo).  So, he's used to gastro issues. But for the past year he's been experiencing bouts of diarrhea that last for hours.  He finally went to his gastroenterologist ... several blood tests ruled out other maladies, but his celiac results are suspect.  He is scheduled for an endoscopy and colonoscopy in 2 weeks.  He was told to eat "gluten free" until the tests!!!  I, and he know nothing about this "diet" much less how to navigate his in daily life!! The more I read, the more my head is spinning.  So I guess I have 2 questions.  First, I read on this website that prior to testing, eat gluten so as not to compromise the testing!  Is that true? His primary care doctor told him to eat gluten free prior to testing!  I'm so confused.  Second, I read that celiac disease is genetic or caused by other ways such as surgery.  No family history but Gall bladder removal 7 years ago, maybe?  But how in God's name does something like this crop up and now is so awful he can't go a day without worrying.  He still works in Manhattan and considers himself lucky if he gets there without incident!  Advice from those who know would be appreciated!!!!!!!!!!!!
    • Scott Adams
      You've done an excellent job of meticulously tracking the rash's unpredictable behavior, from its symmetrical spread and stubborn scabbing to the potential triggers you've identified, like the asthma medication and dietary changes. It's particularly telling that the rash seems to flare with wheat consumption, even though your initial blood test was negative—as you've noted, being off wheat before a test can sometimes lead to a false negative, and your description of the other symptoms—joint pain, brain fog, stomach issues—is very compelling. The symmetry of the rash is a crucial detail that often points toward an internal cause, such as an autoimmune response or a systemic reaction, rather than just an external irritant like a plant or mites. I hope your doctor tomorrow takes the time to listen carefully to all of this evidence you've gathered and works with you to find some real answers and effective relief. Don't be discouraged if the rash fluctuates; your detailed history is the most valuable tool you have for getting an accurate diagnosis.
    • Scott Adams
      In this case the beer is excellent, but for those who are super sensitive it is likely better to go the full gluten-free beer route. Lakefront Brewery (another sponsor!) has good gluten-free beer made without any gluten ingredients.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.