Jump to content
  • You are not alone. Join Celiac.com for trusted gluten-free answers and forum support.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

Update...from Oh No Newbie


AnObstinateOne

Recommended Posts

AnObstinateOne Newbie

So, I am a terribly slacker and never properly thanked my previous repliers....thank you.

Well, the baby had her endoscopy last Tuesday. Doc said he took two biopsies and some fluid samples (for pancreatic enzyme testing?).

I couldn't get another appt for a results show until a MONTH LATER ::thwaps head::: but was told I could call for results in about a week or two.

So when I do call for results, what will they tell me? Is this something a doctor needs to interpret at an appt, or can I get some kind of answer over the phone by whatever the result is? This hurry-up-and-wait approach is maddening. Can the results be trusted in an 18 month old? Doc said he didn't see anything visibly wrong on the scope, but do they ever? Is it something that is visible? Is it easier to put a baby on a gluten-free diet?

On a side note, another kid o' mine has a food allergy, and this week had a severe allergic reaction to some other food she ate (we can't pinpoint what it was just yet. More testing on the way!) If the babe does have celiac disease, I wonder if there will be any food allowed in this house, between the two of them. :rolleyes:


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



gfpaperdoll Rookie

If your baby is finished with testing then you can start to feed her gluten free, even if the biobsy is negative you should do a dietary trial. & oh my only two samples, that does not sound like enough...

re your other child & a food allergy, I have found that when you become gluten free then your other food allergies either go away or are lessened. Not saying to not take an allergy seriously... This child probably also has a gluten problem. when you take one gluten free, I would just do both of them at the same time, well unless you want to get that child tested for celiac first.

I forgot, but did your baby have positive blood work? Is that the reason you had the scope?

wishing you the best in your journey to gluten-free

AnObstinateOne Newbie
If your baby is finished with testing then you can start to feed her gluten free, even if the biobsy is negative you should do a dietary trial. & oh my only two samples, that does not sound like enough...

re your other child & a food allergy, I have found that when you become gluten free then your other food allergies either go away or are lessened. Not saying to not take an allergy seriously... This child probably also has a gluten problem. when you take one gluten free, I would just do both of them at the same time, well unless you want to get that child tested for celiac first.

I forgot, but did your baby have positive blood work? Is that the reason you had the scope?

wishing you the best in your journey to gluten-free

Allergy Child has a peanut allergy, but we've never suspected celiac of any kind, b/c the child is a giant....always in the high percentages for height and weight, etc. No stomach aches or gastro issues. Now that you mention this, if any of the kids goes gluten free, I'll test her on that. Can't hurt, right?

The baby is being tested for a few reasons: although her blood test came back negative, doc said in young kids, it's not all that reliable (she's 18 months). She was tested because she had fallen off her growth curve, she's got steatorrhea (ack!) and we have a family member (my sister) with celiac (blood test and positive response to diet).

Now, yet another kid of mine did get a positive result on the ttg, (borderline...4.9) but his (different) GI doc said that although he had steatorrhea and this pos result, plus some other off numbers on blood work, he did not suspect Celiac :huh: .

Wow, I managed to turn this into a novel. I know, the more I write, the more it seems obvious that I should just do gluten-free for all of them (yes, there's more kids. But just one more.) However, since I'm the only one in their lives who seems to be picking up on any symptoms, I almost feel as though I need some validation that it's not just me....regardless if some of the medical tests are supporting my suspicions. I kind of feel as though I should see this all the way through before I do anything else.

Thanks for getting this far, and if anyone did, you all deserve a (gluten-free?) cookie. :)

gfgypsyqueen Enthusiast

lol...hi obstinant one!

Good luck on the test results. Waiting is maddening! The drs office should be able to give you test results over the phone to tell you if it is celiacs, inconclusive, or not at all a celiac. Did you have any gene testing done? That can help if the test results are inconclusive. I have five food allergies spread between three people in my house (peanuts, tree nuts, dairy, gluten, & shellfish) Grocery shopping is fun. :rolleyes: I found labeling everything with a black permanent marker as you unpack groceries is a huge help for those who can't read or wont read :P

My oldest has the nut allergy. Because of the nut allergy, I have a rule that no nuts of any kind are allowed in the house. EVER! The extended family has taken years to stop showing up with snicker bars...that is another story. This system has worked for us. She has never had another reaction. At least our house is safe :D

A good percentage of gluten-free food is made on shared equipment with nuts, these are allowed only if a safe alternative is not available. I try hard to keep the shared equipment foods to a minimum. My nut allergic child is trustable and good with the labels, so this system works for us.

My youngest dropped off the growth charts, tested inconclusive on the biopsy, has the gene for Celiacs. Her two yr old b day present was a biopsy! Poor thing! The drs still say she is just petite! ARGH!!! She went dairy free after the biopsy and that helped some, but she went completely gluten-free/CF in August. First time ever the stools looked normal, the rashes come back with accidents, etc. That is all the proof I need. But family needed to see something concrete (change in poop, growing again, no more rashes, etc.) in order to believe that she does have a problem with gluten.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Aretaeus Cappadocia replied to cristiana's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      1

      Low iron/high normal haemoglobin

    2. - cristiana posted a topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      1

      Low iron/high normal haemoglobin

    3. - Scott Adams replied to JForman's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      11

      7yo struggling!

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      134,170
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      10,442

    yvonne jacobs
    Newest Member
    yvonne jacobs
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.7k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Aretaeus Cappadocia
      Not sure what you mean by "poor iron levels" if 30 is normal (upper end of normal range) and you are 29. (at least, that's how I read your post. Seems to me that your iron (ferritin) is normal, whereas before it was too high (40). At any rate, your post made me curious, so I copy pasted "Does it actually matters if my iron levels are poor, if my hemoglobin is normal" into the google search bar. According to Dr google, it does matter and they had a lot to say about it.
    • cristiana
      Hello All I think I started a thread on this subject some time ago, but now can't find it.  Or possibly it was someone else's thread that I hijacked - and that's why I can't find it! Anyway, I have a rather complicated issue with iron and I'm wondering what to do about it.  Or even if it matters. Pre-menopause, when I was first diagnosed with coeliac,  my ferritin levels were dreadful and I had to supplement.  It soon became apparent that I had to stop, as once my iron anemia cleared up, my hemoglobin levels reached high normal, verging on a condition known as polycythemia.   High normal in my lab is 15.5 for women, and my level has hovered between 15 and 15.5 The highest my ferritin levels have ever been is 40 (30 being normal) since I started my gluten-free journey - I reached that level about three years ago., about a year post menopause.  18 months later my ferritin had gone down to 29, which I think I can explain because I've been avoiding red meat.  This was a conscious decision as I have  discovered that I can keep my hemoglobin levels at safe levels so long as I don't consume too much iron.  My gastroenterologist also told me not to supplement it.     I have recently had a colonoscopy and have done a FIT test to detect bleeding, both came back normal.  So I feel that the reduced iron consumption is probably the reason for this new deficiency.  But I have two questions: A. Does it actually matters if my iron levels are poor, if my hemoglobin is normal?  (I do feel a bit tired, but surely if my hemoglobin levels are normal I shouldn't?) B. Would my last TTG blood result of 10 (cut off point for normal levels at my lab)  be affecting my absorption of iron? Thanks! Cristinaa  
    • Scott Adams
      This would definitely be an interesting study. We did an article on this a while back:  
    • Scott Adams
    • Aretaeus Cappadocia
      For people of European ancestry, 2% is about average, depending on which study you look at. For Asian ancestry it can be higher. For full Sub-Saharan African ancestry it is zero, but in practice they tend to have trace amounts due to migration back into Africa. While each individual may have 1-3% Neanderthal DNA, it is not always the same DNA that is Neanderthal. Estimates are 20-70% for which parts of the human genome might be Neanderthal in any given individual. Another way of saying this is that 20-70% of the Neanderthal genome survives in the human population. The HLA genotypes that confer susceptibility to celiac (necessary but not sufficient) are known to be of human in origin. There are some other genes known to be associated with a higher probability for getting celiac (with the right HLA genotype) that are associated with Neanderthal DNA. However, there is no correlation between quantity of Neanderthal DNA and probability of getting celiac. Neanderthal DNA is associated with other autoimmune diseases. Lupus, Crohn's disease, and rheumatoid arthritis are probably the most strongly associated diseases.
×
×
  • Create New...