Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Who Knows What These Test Results Mean?


lucybear

Recommended Posts

lucybear Newbie

My nurse called this afternoon and told me no worries, I didn't have Celiac.

However, I have tons of symptoms--GI issues, Vit. D deficiency, clotting disorder that caused a miscarriage, history of unexplained infertility, and peripheral neuropathy that can't be explained. When I asked the nurse for my levels, she just kept saying the dr. (neurologist) said everything was normal. I continued to ask for the numbers, and she said, "Well, a few were high, but they're nothing to worry about." I don't know much at all about these tests. But I do know from my history of infertility to turn to the experts, people who are going through the same thing. So, here were my levels. This is from the phone conversation, so I only have some of the normal levels. I'm going Monday to pick up my copy of the lab work. What do you guys think?

Imm. A - 301 (normal range)

IgA - 1 (normal 0-4)

Ads IgG - 7 (normal 0-9)

Endomysial Antibodies - negative

Antinuclear antibodies direct 40 (normal 0-99)

Immunoglobulin M - 285 (normal 40-230)

Sed rate - 30 (normal 0-20)

I remember reading somewhere that if you are IgA deficient, you are more likely to get a negative blood test even if you have Celiac. What does IgA deficient mean?

I think I'm going to try a gluten free diet anyway, because we're trying it with my son per his pediatrician. I'm just interested in what the high Imm M and Sed rate might mean.

Thanks!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Guest Doll
My nurse called this afternoon and told me no worries, I didn't have Celiac.

However, I have tons of symptoms--GI issues, Vit. D deficiency, clotting disorder that caused a miscarriage, history of unexplained infertility, and peripheral neuropathy that can't be explained. When I asked the nurse for my levels, she just kept saying the dr. (neurologist) said everything was normal. I continued to ask for the numbers, and she said, "Well, a few were high, but they're nothing to worry about." I don't know much at all about these tests. But I do know from my history of infertility to turn to the experts, people who are going through the same thing. So, here were my levels. This is from the phone conversation, so I only have some of the normal levels. I'm going Monday to pick up my copy of the lab work. What do you guys think?

Imm. A - 301 (normal range)

IgA - 1 (normal 0-4)

Ads IgG - 7 (normal 0-9)

Endomysial Antibodies - negative

Antinuclear antibodies direct 40 (normal 0-99)

Immunoglobulin M - 285 (normal 40-230)

Sed rate - 30 (normal 0-20)

I remember reading somewhere that if you are IgA deficient, you are more likely to get a negative blood test even if you have Celiac. What does IgA deficient mean?

I think I'm going to try a gluten free diet anyway, because we're trying it with my son per his pediatrician. I'm just interested in what the high Imm M and Sed rate might mean.

Thanks!

This is a tough call. There is really no way to tell if you have Celiac or not. Assuming this test is correct, you have elevated Immunoglobulin M (elevated usually due to infections, and can cause abnormal blood clotting), and an elevated Sed rate (indicates inflammation, high levels MAY occur in autoimmune disease).

These in itself do not indicate Celiac. You do not have an IgA deficiency, your doctor tested you for that (the first test). So in theory, you will not have a false negative from IgA deficiency. In general, blood tests are usually fairly accurate in adults, especially if IgA deficiency has been ruled out.

*However* a small percentage of people seem to be seronegative and yet still have a positive biopsy. It is up to you if you want to go the biopsy route or not. Also, some people seem to have "leaky guts" and "gluten intolerance" but not Celiac Disease. This seems to happen most often in people who have autoimmune diseases. It looks like there are different forms of intolerance to gluten that are not well studied. Some cases are linked to infections.

It does sound like you may have some sort of infection that may be contributing to a leaky gut. Has your doctor ruled out bowel infections? Has he ever investigated why your Im. M is elevated?

Regardless, you can always try going gluten-free to see if you notice any improvement. I would follow up with your doctor. A vitamin D deficiency? Do you get regular sun exposure in addition to dietary sources? Low vitamin D levels are thought to contribute to autoimmunity (especially Type 1 diabetes and MS). Or, low vitamin D levels may simply be a symptom of the disease. The research is not clear yet. Have you been screened for MS or a Vitamin B12 deficiency (this can be caused by Pernicious Anemia, an autoimmune disease) with your neuropathy symptoms?

It sounds like you could have anything from an infection, to subclinical autoimmunity, to seronegative Celiac, to non-Celiac gluten intolerance!

You can try the diet for sure, but I would pursue further investigation, especially if you do not feel better. If you do turn out to have some sort of autoimmunity, but not Celiac, I still suggest going gluten-free.

Good luck!

Osprey101 Newbie
Imm. A - 301 (normal range)

IgA - 1 (normal 0-4)

Ads IgG - 7 (normal 0-9)

Endomysial Antibodies - negative

Antinuclear antibodies direct 40 (normal 0-99)

Immunoglobulin M - 285 (normal 40-230)

Sed rate - 30 (normal 0-20)

I remember reading somewhere that if you are IgA deficient, you are more likely to get a negative blood test even if you have Celiac. What does IgA deficient mean?

I think I'm going to try a gluten free diet anyway, because we're trying it with my son per his pediatrician. I'm just interested in what the high Imm M and Sed rate might mean.

Thanks!

Sed rate (sedimentation rate) is the rate at which red blood cells fall in uncoagulated (non-clotted) blood in a clean glass tube. An elevated rate means inflammation- but it does not give a cause. It is a simple test that can be used with other, more powerful tests; an elevated sed rate on its own is not useful.

IgM is a bit more complicated. From Wikipedia:

"IgM antibodies appear early in the course of an infection and usually do not reappear after further exposure. IgM antibodies do not pass across the human placenta.

These two biological properties of IgM make it useful in the diagnosis of infectious diseases. Demonstrating IgM antibodies in a patient's serum indicates recent infection, or in a neonate's serum indicates intrauterine infection (e.g. congenital rubella)."

IgA (immunoglobulin A) deficiency is just that- a reduced antibody. There's a lot more on IgA and IgG here (if you can wade through it):

Open Original Shared Link

Try the diet. Be meticulous in your exclusion of wheat gluten. Canned foods (beans and franks), food specifically labeled as "wheat gluten free," fish, and so forth. Don't eat out if you can avoid it. They can test you and test you and test you until your wallet is empty, but the ultimate test is dietary exclusion, followed by a challenge- but that'll be 6-8 weeks later, if all goes well.

Good luck!

mftnchn Explorer

Am I wrong here or are you missing the Ttg? Check your tests with the 5 recommended on the Columbia U website. I think you are missing the most accurate and specific test, but am not sure.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Scott Adams replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      7

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    2. - Scott Adams replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    3. - deanna1ynne replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    4. - cristiana replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      7

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,438
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    rednecksurfer
    Newest Member
    rednecksurfer
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      In the U.S., most regular wheat breads are required to be enriched with certain B-vitamins and iron, but gluten-free breads are not required to be. Since many gluten-free products are not enriched, we usually encourage people with celiac disease to consider a multivitamin.  In the early 1900s, refined white flour replaced whole grains, and people began developing serious vitamin-deficiency diseases: Beriberi → caused by a lack of thiamin (vitamin B1) Pellagra → caused by a lack of niacin (vitamin B3) Anemia → linked to low iron and lack of folate By the 1930s–40s, these problems were common in the U.S., especially in poorer regions. Public-health officials responded by requiring wheat flour and the breads made from it to be “enriched” with thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, and iron. Folic acid was added later (1998) to prevent neural-tube birth defects. Why gluten-free bread isn’t required to be enriched? The U.S. enrichment standards were written specifically for wheat flour. Gluten-free breads use rice, tapioca, corn, sorghum, etc.—so they fall outside that rule—but they probably should be for the same reason wheat products are.
    • Scott Adams
      Keep in mind that there are drawbacks to a formal diagnosis, for example more expensive life and private health insurance, as well as possibly needing to disclose it on job applications. Normally I am in favor of the formal diagnosis process, but if you've already figured out that you can't tolerate gluten and will likely stay gluten-free anyway, I wanted to at least mention the possible negative sides of having a formal diagnosis. While I understand wanting a formal diagnosis, it sounds like she will likely remain gluten-free either way, even if she should test negative for celiac disease (Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If her symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet, it would likely signal NCGS).        
    • JoJo0611
    • deanna1ynne
      Thank you all so much for your advice and thoughts. We ended up having another scope and more bloodwork last week. All serological markers continue to increase, and the doc who did the scope said there villous atrophy visible on the scope — but we just got the biopsy pathology report back, and all it says is, “Duodenal mucosa with patchy increased intraepithelial lymphocytes, preserved villous architecture, and patchy foveolar metaplasia,” which we are told is still inconclusive…  We will have her go gluten free again anyway, but how soon would you all test again, if at all? How valuable is an official dx in a situation like this?
    • cristiana
      Thanks for this Russ, and good to see that it is fortified. I spend too much time looking for M&S gluten-free Iced Spiced Buns to have ever noticed this! That's interesting, Scott.  Have manufacturers ever said why that should be the case?  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.