Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):
  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Is A Scope Neccesary?


Guest shai

Recommended Posts

Guest shai

I have had food allergies for years now with reactions such as hives, asthma, and eczema, as well as swelling after meals. I noticed that whenever I would eat starchy foods I would lose weight. When I was pregnant I started getting the diarreah every day, all day. It continued for months after having the baby last June. I went to the doctor in August and told her my symptoms and she did the gluten intolerance blood test and it came back positive for the antibodies. I started the diet and in about a month I saw a big improvement in my symptoms. ALong with the diarreah I had an itchy bum <_< blistery, eczema-like skin problems, and the asthma problems and a sore throat after eating wheat. It almost sounds like I am also allergic to wheat. is that pretty common? Or is an anaphelectic reaction typical with gluten intolerance?

Also, my sons GI specialist told me the only way to know for sure is to get a scope up my butt. I don't want to have to do that. Is it the only way to know for sure, or is the blood test pretty conclusive? My doctor said that only people with celiacs produce the antibodies against gluten, and that along with the symptoms a scope shouldn't be necessary. WHat do you all think.

I'd also like to mention that my sister has all the same symptoms as me, but her blood test came back negative. Should she have the scope too? Thanks!

Shai


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



tom Contributor

I think most of the scoping is down the esophagus.

It's an Upper Endoscopy.

Open Original Shared Link

Re: your sister's negative blood test. Earlier this year, a Columbia U study found an astounding percentage of false negatives in the classic celiac blood (serological) test.

https://www.celiac.com/st_prod.html?p_prodid=1023

They started w/ 115 biopsy-proven adult celiacs, and put them in 2 groups - total villous atrophy and partial.

Only 77% of the group w/ TOTAL atrophy tested positive !

And only a third of the partials.

That means a LOT of celiacs have had a doctor say "the blood test says u don't have celiac disease" when the truth may be they've gotten as far as TOTAL villous atrophy.

If i weren't already diagnosed, i think i'd want the genetic HLA-typing to be sure whether DQ2 and/or DQ8 are there.

[edited typo 12-7]

bigapplekathleen Contributor

The scope is done by "upper endoscopy." Check out the WEbMD info about that procedure.

I had one done yesterday. IT was quick and painless, but I was groggy the rest of the day due to the sedative.

good luck!

judy05 Apprentice

I urge you to have the scope. I'm so glad my GI doc insisted upon it.

I tested neg for celiac, my villi were not damaged but they found

Barrett's Ring around the esophagus. It is caused by a weak

sphincter and the acid "backs up" (reflux) and splashes up into

the esophagus. In time this could turn to cancer so I

have to be scoped yearly. I urge anyone with acid reflux or

gerd to have this done.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - asaT replied to wellthatsfun's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      2

      nothing has changed

    2. - nanny marley replied to SilkieFairy's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      7

      IBS-D vs Celiac

    3. - asaT replied to Scott Adams's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      45

      Supplements for those Diagnosed with Celiac Disease

    4. - par18 replied to Woodster991's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      9

      Is it gluten?

    5. - SilkieFairy replied to SilkieFairy's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      7

      IBS-D vs Celiac

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,342
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Muhammad
    Newest Member
    Muhammad
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.6k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • asaT
      Scott, I am mostly asymptomatic. I was diagnosed based on high antibodies, low ferritin (3) and low vitamin D (10). I wasn't able to get in for the biopsy until 3 months after the blood test came back. I was supposed to keep eating gluten during this time. Well why would I continue doing something that I know to be harmful for 3 more months to just get this test? So I did quit gluten and had the biopsy. It was negative for celiacs. I continued gluten free with iron supps and my ferritin came back up to a reasonable, but not great level of around 30-35.  Could there be something else going on? Is there any reason why my antibodies would be high (>80) with a negative biopsy? could me intestines have healed that quickly (3 months)?  I'm having a hard time staying gluten free because I am asymptomatic and i'm wondering about that biopsy. I do have the celiacs gene, and all of the antibody tests have always come back high. I recently had them tested again. Still very high. I am gluten free mostly, but not totally. I will occasionally eat something with gluten, but try to keep to a minimum. It's really hard when the immediate consequences are nil.  with high antibodies, the gene, but a negative biopsy (after 3 months strict gluten-free), do i really have celiacs? please say no. lol. i think i know the answer.  Asa
    • nanny marley
      I have had a long year of testing unfortunately still not diagnosed , although one thing they definitely agree I'm gluten intolerant, the thing for me I have severe back troubles they wouldnt perform the tests and I couldn't have a full MRI because I'm allergic to the solution , we tryed believe me  I tryed lol , another was to have another blood test after consuming gluten but it makes me so bad I tryed it for only a week, and because I have a trapped sciatic nerve when I get bad bowels it sets that off terribly so I just take it on myself now , I eat a gluten free diet , I'm the best I've ever been , and if I slip I know it so for me i have my own diagnosis  and I act accordingly, sometimes it's not so straight forward for some of us , for the first time in years I can plan to go out , and I have been absorbing my food better , running to the toilet has become occasionally now instead of all the time , i hope you find a solution 🤗
    • asaT
      I was undiagnosed for decades. My ferritin when checked in 2003 was 3. It never went above 10 in the next 20 years. I was just told to "take iron". I finally requested the TTgIgA test in 2023 when I was well and truly done with the chronic fatigue and feeling awful. My numbers were off the charts on the whole panel.  they offered me an endoscopic biopsy 3 months later, but that i would need to continue eating gluten for it to be accurate. so i quit eating gluten and my intestine had healed by the time i had the biopsy (i'm guessing??). Why else would my TTgIgA be so high if not celiacs? Anyway, your ferritin will rise as your intestine heals and take HEME iron (brand 4 arrows). I took 20mg of this with vitamin c and lactoferrin and my ferritin went up, now sits around 35.  you will feel dramatically better getting your ferritin up, and you can do it orally with the right supplements. I wouldn't get an infusion, you will get as good or better results taking heme iron/vc/lf.  
    • par18
      Scott, I agree with everything you said except the term "false negative". It should be a "true negative" just plain negative. I actually looked up true/false negative/positive as it pertains to testing. The term "false negative" would be correct if you are positive (have anti-bodies) and the test did not pick them up. That would be a problem with the "test" itself. If you were gluten-free and got tested, you more than likely would test "true" negative or just negative. This means that the gluten-free diet is working and no anti-bodies should be present. I know it sounds confusing and if you don't agree feel free to respond. 
    • SilkieFairy
      I realized it is actually important to get an official diagnosis because then insurance can cover bone density testing and other lab work to see if any further damage has been done because of it. Also, if hospitalized for whatever reason, I have the right to gluten-free food if I am officially celiac. I guess it gives me some legal protections. Plus, I have 4 kids, and I really want to know. If I really do have it then they may have increased risk. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.