Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Enterolab Results, Help!


pixiegirl

Recommended Posts

pixiegirl Enthusiast

Ok I got my results from EnteroLab and I'm not sure what they mean... I guess I have two genes for the disease?

Gluten Sensitivity Stool Test

Fecal Antigliadin IgA 14 Units (Normal <10 Units*)

Stool Test for Autoimmune Reaction to Tissue Transglutaminase

Fecal Antitissue Transglutaminase IgA 6 Units (Normal <10 Units)

Stool Test for Small Intestinal Malabsorption

Microscopic Fecal Fat Score: 58 Units (Normal < 300 Units)

Stool Test for Milk Sensitivity

Fecal anti-casein IgA antibody 6 Units (Negative <10 Units)

Gene Test for Gluten Sensitivity

Molecular analysis: HLA-DQB1*0201, 0201

Serologic equivalent: HLA-DQ 2,2

Interpretation: Analysis of this stool sample indicates you have dietary

gluten sensitivity but levels of intestinal IgA antibodies to the human

enzyme, tissue transglutaminase, and the milk protein, casein, were below

the upper limit of normal and there was no malabsorption of dietary fat.

HLA gene analysis reveals that you have two copies of the main gene that

predisposes to gluten sensitivity and celiac sprue (HLA-DQ2). This genotype

also can predispose to microscopic colitis and other autoimmune syndromes.

Two copies of these genes are an even stronger predisposition than having

one gene and the resultant immunologic gluten sensitivity and disease may

be more severe. Furthermore, having two copies of the gene means that each

of your parents, and all of your children (if you have them) will possess

at least one copy of the gene as well.

For optimal health and prevention of small intestinal damage, osteoporosis,

damage to other tissues (like nerves, joints, pancreas, skin, liver, among

others), and malnutrition, recommend a strict gluten free diet and

re-testing in one year to insure this reaction is lessening. If you are

experiencing any symptoms, these may resolve following a gluten free diet.

As gluten sensitivity is a genetic syndrome, you may want to have your

relatives screened as well.

Thanks, Susan :huh:


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



pixiegirl Enthusiast

I see people are reading this but not replying... I'll be more specific... do i have the 2 main celiac genes? Also since the rest of my values are normal or even low normal... well how could that be, I've had symptoms for at least 8-10 years?

Thanks, Susan

plantime Contributor

Yes, you have two genes. Both of your parents have at least one gene for celiac. All of your children will have at least one gene for celiac. The rest of your results were normal or low-normal because the disease has not yet kicked into full gear on you. You are having some symptoms, though, so if you continue to consume gluten, you are adding dynomite to an explosive situation. It could just be that the next extremely stressful event in your life is all that it will take to trigger an explosion of problems. You now know of the impending detonation, so please be kind to yourself and your family, and defuse the timebomb.

mommida Enthusiast

I'm not a doctor.

You have 2 genes that are strongly associated with Celiac and other known auto immune diseases.

Since the paragraph states your children will have at least one of these genes passed on to the them, would mean recessive and dominant HLA gene.

( That is just layman terms as I understand them.)

It also stated that you would be more likely to have more severe reactions because of this. With the other antibodies test does this mean your gluten sensitivity is like full blown Celiac symptoms? Sounds like the thought path of the report. Stay on a gluten free diet for life, because your genes would allow damage to your small intestine when exposed to gluten.

I hope my interpretation of your results helps.

L

pixiegirl Enthusiast

yes it does help some but I'm still amazed that I don't have any damage after so many years of symptoms (and the runs for 8 years). I'm gluten-free and plan to stay that way.

Susan

bigapplekathleen Contributor

Have you had an endoscopy and biopsy? That's where you're gonna see if you really have symptoms....

pixiegirl Enthusiast

No I've not had that and at this point I'm not going to. I'm assuming from the other levels in my test results that I don't have any damage yet, all those number were low normal, so from what I've been told the likelihood of my actually having damage yet is slim.

Susan


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



tom Contributor
Have you had an endoscopy and biopsy? That's where you're gonna see if you really have symptoms....

Seems to me most of us know we "really have symptoms", biopsy or not.

Whether or not a doc sees damaged villi won't change your behavior, right ?

Re: DQ2 - My doc said that 90% of celiacs have DQ2( or DQ2 and DQ8), while the remaining 10% have only DQ8. One copy of either is enough to have the disease. The only difference in your having 2 copies of DQ2 is the part about your children being guaranteed to get DQ2.

Mommida mentioned the words recessive and dominant. Awhile ago, I looked up info on celiac heredity and genetic diseases in general and found that those words aren't relevant for us. Some traits certainly DO have recessive/dominant genes and they fall in a category called Mendelian Genetics. (Mendel discovered the recessive/dominant phenomenon and practically invented the field of genetics)

There is no recessive celiac gene.

  • 1 month later...
mkjolaf Newbie

Hi Pixigirl and others,

I just got my results from the same lab as well and I'm wondering what you've learned about the validity of these tests and your thoughts on my results for which I'll post below... thanks.

-Michael

Gluten Sensitivity Stool Test

Fecal Antigliadin IgA 17 Units (Normal Range <10 Units)

Stool Test for Autoimmune Reaction to Tissue Transglutaminase

Fecal Antitissue Transglutaminase IgA 16 Units (Normal Range <10 Units)

Stool Test for Small Intestinal Malabsorption

Microscopic Fecal Fat Score: 680 Units (Normal Range < 300 Units)

Stool Test for Milk Sensitivity

Fecal anti-casein IgA antibody 16 Units (Normal Range <10 Units)

Gene Test for Gluten Sensitivity

Molecular analysis: HLA-DQB1*0501, 0302

Serologic equivalent: HLA-DQ 1,3 (Subtype 5,8)

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,204
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Donna Yunkus
    Newest Member
    Donna Yunkus
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Fayeb23
      Thank you that’s really helpful, hopeful won’t have to have a biopsy.
    • RMJ
      That means the normal range (i.e. not celiac disease) would be a result less than 14.99.  Your result is WAY above that. Some gastroenterologists would diagnose that as celiac disease even without a confirming biopsy because it is more than ten times the top of the normal range.
    • Redanafs
      Hi everyone. Back in 2022 I had blood work drawn for iga ext gliadin. Since then I’ve developed worse stomach issues and all other health issues. My doctor just said cut out gluten. He did no further testing. Please see my test results attached. I just need some direction cause I feel so ill and the stomach pain is becoming worse. Can this test show indications for other gastrointestinal diseases?
    • Fayeb23
      Thank you. These were the results TTG ABS NUMERICAL: > 250.0 U/mL [< 14.99]  Really don’t understand the results!
    • Scott Adams
      Clearly from what you've said the info on Dailymed is much more up to date than the other site, which hasn't been updated since 2017. The fact that some companies might be repackaging drugs does not mean the info on the ingredients is not correct.
×
×
  • Create New...