Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Crohn's And Celiac's?


Chiron

Recommended Posts

Chiron Apprentice

I was diagnosed with Crohn's Disease in the Fall of 2004 after having an abcessed mass removed from my terminul illeum. They were hesitant to call it Crohn's before surgery, but said the pahology reports showed Crohn's.

I just relocated and so switched GI docs and he ordered a colonoscopy to see what was going on with the Crohn's. In the meantime a primary care doc ordered a celiac panel and IGA, IgA TTG, and EMA all positive for Celiac. I conviced the GI doc to do an endoscopy and he agreed but only to "rule out" celiacs- that he didn't think that was what was going on despite the lab results. He said that Crohn's disease often causes the presence of antibodies in the gut.

I have done a lot of reading about Celiacs in the last few weeks and it would explain aolmost all of my symptoms including: GI issues, chronic muscle and joint pain, fatigue, anemia, B-12 deficiency, thyroid disease, peripheral neuropathy, and depression/anxiety.

The biopsy results may soon answer my question... but while I nervously wait, does anyone know about the prevalence of the combination of Crohn's and Celiacs. I also wonder if it could have been celiacs all along and not Crohn's. Friday's colonoscopy showed no signs of Crohn's- yet I am experiencing a lot of abdominal pain and diarrhea.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Ursa Major Collaborator

Yes, it isn't unusual for people with celiac disease to be misdiagnosed with Crohn's. If your blood work was elevated for every single one of the celiac disease tests, it is highly unlikely that it was because of having Crohn's!

After you have had your biopsy (and I mean immediately after, without waiting for results) you ought to do a gluten-free diet trial for at least a few months. The biopsy is hit and miss, with the damage being missed frequently. Even if the results are negative you likely have celiac disease.

All of your symptoms could be caused by celiac disease. I bet that was your problem all along.

ravenwoodglass Mentor

After living with an IBS diagnosis for 15 years after I was finally diagnosed celiac my GI actually LISTENED to my symptoms and gave the very telling remark 'Those symptms were not IBS symtpoms they were chrons, why didn't you tell me how bad it was' I did, repeatedly and they didn't listen. I would awaken from sleep every night for 5 years with gut wrenching pain and 3 hours of D. But when I told the doctors all they wanted to do was give me more psychotropics and sleeping pills.

So yes you can have Chrons level symptoms and have them actually be from celiac, the biggest clue is that they did not find severe ulcerations when they did your colonoscopy. You really should start the diet as soon as you get home from your endo. Don't wait for the results. For one thing if your GI is convinced you don't have celiac then he isn't going to be looking real hard for it. He may also blow off preceliac changes as something else and just hand you more meds and a list of nice 'high fiber' poison to consume on a daily basis. If you have positive blood work you need the diet no matter what the biopsies say.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,690
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Aless25
    Newest Member
    Aless25
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      I'd go with a vodka tonic, but that's just me😉
    • Rejoicephd
      That and my nutritionist also said that drinking cider is one of the worst drink choices for me, given that I have candida overgrowth.  She said the combination of the alcohol and sugar would be very likely to worsen my candida problem.  She suggested that if I drink, I go for clear vodka, either neat or with a splash of cranberry.   So in summary, I am giving ciders a rest.  Whether it's a gluten risk or sugars and yeast overgrowth, its just not worth it.
    • Inkie
      Thank you for the information ill will definitely bring it into practice .
    • Scott Adams
      While plain, pure tea leaves (black, green, or white) are naturally gluten-free, the issue often lies not with the tea itself but with other ingredients or processing. Many flavored teas use barley malt or other gluten-containing grains as a flavoring agent, which would be clearly listed on the ingredient label. Cross-contamination is another possibility, either in the facility where the tea is processed or, surprisingly, from the tea bag material itself—some tea bags are sealed with a wheat-based glue. Furthermore, it's important to consider that your reaction could be to other substances in tea, such as high levels of tannins, which can be hard on the stomach, or to natural histamines or other compounds that can cause a non-celiac immune response. The best way to investigate is to carefully read labels for hidden ingredients, try switching to a certified gluten-free tea brand that uses whole leaf or pyramid-style bags, and see if the reaction persists.
    • Scott Adams
      This is a challenging and confusing situation. The combination of a positive EMA—which is a highly specific marker rarely yielding false positives—alongside strongly elevated TTG on two separate occasions, years apart, is profoundly suggestive of celiac disease, even in the absence of biopsy damage. This pattern strongly aligns with what is known as "potential celiac disease," where the immune system is clearly activated, but intestinal damage has not yet become visible under the microscope. Your concern about the long-term risk of continued gluten consumption is valid, especially given your family's experience with the consequences of delayed diagnosis. Since your daughter is now at an age where her buy-in is essential for a gluten-free lifestyle, obtaining a definitive answer is crucial for her long-term adherence and health. Given that she is asymptomatic yet serologically positive, a third biopsy now, after a proper 12-week challenge, offers the best chance to capture any microscopic damage that may have developed, providing the concrete evidence needed to justify the dietary change. This isn't about wanting her to have celiac; it's about wanting to prevent the insidious damage that can occur while waiting for symptoms to appear, and ultimately giving her the unambiguous "why" she needs to accept and commit to the necessary treatment. This article might be helpful. It breaks down each type of test, and what a positive results means in terms of the probability that you might have celiac disease. One test that always needs to be done is the IgA Levels/Deficiency Test (often called "Total IGA") because some people are naturally IGA deficient, and if this is the case, then certain blood tests for celiac disease might be false-negative, and other types of tests need to be done to make an accurate diagnosis. The article includes the "Mayo Clinic Protocol," which is the best overall protocol for results to be ~98% accurate.    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.