Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Would You Be Among The First To Give It A Try?


Molecular Dude

Recommended Posts

Molecular Dude Apprentice

For those of you that are saying "No", I certainly understand your views. There is always risk with drug trials, and with medications even after they have been approved by the FDA. But, remember this is a HYPOTHETICAL secondary trial (I mentioned AT-1001 only as an example to start this thread). I probably wouldn't participate in a Phase I study either. But, the way I see it when it comes to Phase II, you can't win if you don't play! If it turns out well, you have helped both yourself and the world community. If not, at least you took a shot at bettering both yourself and the world.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



kevsmom Contributor

Several years ago, I was treated for a benign brain tumor. Afer undergoing two conventional surgeries, it was discovered that they could not remove all of it.

I was offered the chance to be the first patient at a local hospital to have non-invasive Cyberknife surgery. They brought me into the room where the surgery was to be done, and I could still smell the wet paint on the walls. The doctor who would be performing the procedure said to me "You will be the first person we will do this on - oh, we have done it before at other hospitals, but not here" :D.When they did it, a whole team from Stanford University was there to supervise and observe.

After the treatment, I got up off the table and went to work. A big difference from the conventional surgeries.

Without people who are willing to undergo trials, new ways of treatment would not be available.

Cindy

kbtoyssni Contributor

Nope. Not for something like celiac that has an easy, non-drug treatment. I don't find the diet to be *that* hard. It's just what I do. I don't know what's in this drug, but the possibility of side effects and other toxin-related issues is enough to make me not want to take it.

VioletBlue Contributor

Take a look at this thread and tell me what you think: Open Original Shared Link

Does that sound to like they're planning to sell this drug on down the line as an aid to help when people "accidentally" gluten themselves? "Do you dream about being able to eat pizza, pasta, cookies, cake and all of your favorite gluten-containing products again?" It doesn't to me. I sounds like they're invisioning a cure that involves a life long dependancy on a drug. Likewise, are the lactaid pills on the market sold for accidental lactose ingestion or are they sold to people with the understanding that now they can drink all the milk they want?

There is what the drug CAN be used for and then there is how a drug like this will evidtably wind up being marketed.

Violet

Jodi Mills Apprentice
Take a look at this thread and tell me what you think: Open Original Shared Link

Likewise, are the lactaid pills on the market sold for accidental lactose ingestion or are they sold to people with the understanding that now they can drink all the milk they want?

Violet

Hi Violet, My boyfriend is lactose intolerant, And for the pills to work you are to take them before you eat/drink anything with lactose in it. They work up to 45 minutes, so if you take them and then eat an hour later they wont help at all. They dont cure his lactose intolerence completly, he still has some effects of the lactose, but is not nearly as bad as if he misses the pills completely.

If it were for accidental ingestion, then you would be able to take them anytime after ingesting lactose, but it says on his box to take them before eating.

hope that helps. havent gotten to look at that thread, but will when I am at home,(my house comp. is way faster than this one at work.)

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,201
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Judy Wysocki
    Newest Member
    Judy Wysocki
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Xravith
      I'm very confused... My blood test came out negative, I checked all antibodies. I suppose my Total IgA levels are normal (132 mg/dl), so the test should be reliable. Still, I'm not relieved as I can't tolerate even a single biscuit. I need to talk to my doctor about whether a duodenal biopsy is necessary. But it is really possible to have intestinal damage despite having a seronegative results? I have really strong symptoms, and I don't want to keep skipping university lectures or being bedridden at home.
    • Scott Adams
      They may want to also eliminate other possible causes for your symptoms/issues and are doing additional tests.  Here is info about blood tests for celiac disease--if positive an endoscopy where biopsies of your intestinal villi are taken to confirm is the typical follow up.    
    • Scott Adams
      In the Europe the new protocol for making a celiac disease diagnosis in children is if their tTg-IgA (tissue transglutaminase IgA) levels are 10 times or above the positive level for celiac disease--and you are above that level. According to the latest research, if the blood test results are at certain high levels that range between 5-10 times the reference range for a positive celiac disease diagnosis, it may not be necessary to confirm the results using an endoscopy/biopsy: Blood Test Alone Can Diagnose Celiac Disease in Most Children and Adults TGA-IgA at or Above Five Times Normal Limit in Kids Indicates Celiac Disease in Nearly All Cases No More Biopsies to Diagnose Celiac Disease in Children! May I ask why you've had so many past tTg-IgA tests done, and many of them seem to have been done 3 times during short time intervals?    
    • trents
      @JettaGirl, "Coeliac" is the British spelling of "celiac". Same disease. 
    • JettaGirl
      This may sound ridiculous but is this supposed to say Celiacs? I looked up Coeliacs because you never know, there’s a lot of diseases related to a disease that they come up with similar names for. It’s probably meant to say Celiacs but I just wanted to confirm.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.