Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Why Cant I Get My Cookies To 'stick' Together?!


blondebombshell

Recommended Posts

blondebombshell Collaborator

i just baked cookies and not only do they taste, EHHH they wont stay togehter!

they keep crumbling apart. i used a gluten free flour blend and an egg replacer.

what gives?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



cruelshoes Enthusiast

Please post the recipe. Is it one you are modifying, or one that is already written to be gluten-free? What flour blend did you use? Does it have xanthan or guar gum in it? Without knowing those things, it is hard to diagnose the problem.

jerseyangel Proficient

My first thought is--did you use xanthan gum?

blondebombshell Collaborator
Please post the recipe. Is it one you are modifying, or one that is already written to be gluten-free? What flour blend did you use? Does it have xanthan or guar gum in it? Without knowing those things, it is hard to diagnose the problem.

this is the flour i used

Open Original Shared Link

2 1/4 cups flour

1 tsp baking soda

1/4 tsp xanthan gum

1/8 tsp salt

2 sticks unsalted butter

3/4 cup brown sugar

1/4 granulated sugar

1 egg (i used a replacer)

choc. chip

jerseyangel Proficient

The recipe doesn't call for enough of the xanthan--I'd use a good teaspoon. :)

I don't have a lot of experience with egg replacers, but the few times I did use them, I noticed that the texture of the final product was somewhat drier. That also could have contributed to it, but definately use more xanthan next time.

jerseyangel Proficient

You could also try substituting 1/2 the butter for shortening--I use Spectrum Shortening in cookies and find that it makes them more chewy.

cruelshoes Enthusiast

I'm with Jersey angel, I'd definitely increase the xanthan. The general rules for adding xanthan are:


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,162
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Carolyn harkless
    Newest Member
    Carolyn harkless
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Let me hasten to add that if you will be undergoing an endoscopy/biopsy, it is critical that you do not begin efforts to reduce gluten beforehand. Doing so will render the results invalid as it will allow the small bowel lining to heal and, therefore, obscure the damage done by celiac disease which is what the biopsy is looking for.
    • Scott Adams
      This article, and the comments below it, may be helpful:    
    • Scott Adams
      That’s a really tough situation. A few key points: as mentioned, a gluten challenge does require daily gluten for several weeks to make blood tests meaningful, but negative tests after limited exposure aren’t reliable. Dermatitis herpetiformis can also be tricky to diagnose unless the biopsy is taken from normal-looking skin next to a lesion. Some people with celiac or DH don’t react every time they’re exposed, so lack of symptoms doesn’t rule it out. Given your history and family cancer risk, this is something I’d strongly discuss with a celiac-experienced gastroenterologist or dermatologist before attempting a challenge on your own, so risks and benefits are clearly weighed.
    • Greymo
      https://celiac.org/glutenexposuremarkers/    yes, two hours after accidents ingesting gluten I am vomiting and then diarrhea- then exhaustion and a headache. see the article above- There is research that shows our reactions.
    • trents
      Concerning the EMA positive result, the EMA was the original blood test developed to detect celiac disease and has largely been replaced by the tTG-IGA which has a similar reliability confidence but is much less expensive to run. Yes, a positive EMA is very strong evidence of celiac disease but not foolproof. In the UK, a tTG-IGA score that is 10x normal or greater will often result in foregoing the endoscopy/biopsy. Weaker positives on the tTG-IGA still trigger the endoscopy/biopsy. That protocol is being considered in the US but is not yet in place.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.