Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Seeking Official Diagnosis


jenrn

Recommended Posts

jenrn Apprentice

Hello everyone. I am fairly new to this forum and I am looking for opinions. I went gluten free in Oct 2007 after many years of GI issues. I had absolutely no appetite and felt nauseous all the time. I had testing for celiac disease in April 2007 and even had a biopsy done- everything came back negative. I forgot about it for a few months until I started reading that it is possible for the tests to come back negative even if you really do have celiac disease. So I did the enterolab testing which was positive for gluten sensitivity and I discovered that I carry a double copy of the DQ2 gene.

Once I found out I had two genes I decided to try the gluten free diet. Well it has been amazing. I am not nauseous anymore and I actually feel hungry. I had been slowly losing weight (unintentionally) for the last few years and couldn't figure out why- now I have finally gained a few pounds and am almost back to a normal weight. It has been amazing- I literally used to wake up in the middle of the night feeling so sick I would be up for hours waiting for the feeling to pass. That hasn't happened since I went gluten free and it is so nice!

So here is my question- am I nuts to want an official diagnosis? Since I went gluten free I have found out that I have Hashimoto's thyroid disease. I also just had a bone scan done and found out I have pretty bad osteopenia- I am only 28 years old! All of these signs scream celiac disease to me. Everything of course except for the official tests accepted by the medical community. And I am a part of the medical community- I am a nurse practitioner and I think that is partly why I want an official diagnosis. As a group we are just trained to want the lab results that support a diagnosis. It isn't necessarily always a good thing to think that way but it is hard not to in this field. But I really do not ever want to go back on gluten again.

I have been thinking about going to see Dr. Green at Columbia (I live in NY) but don't want to waste my time (or money) if he is just going to brush me off and tell me I have to go back on gluten. Has anyone ever seen him? Well if you have read this far I thank you and I welcome any insight or opinions.

Jen


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



happygirl Collaborator

Any experienced doctor will tell you, Dr. Green or others, for testing to be accurate, that you need to be consuming gluten for an extended period of time.

Which blood tests were run?

Did the doctor performing the biopsy take multiple biopsies in multiple locations?

You may not have had the full panel run, and your dr. may not have taken enough biopsies. As you know, Celiac is a patchy disease. If the testing wasn't done properly, your "negative" tests aren't as indicative.

You may have Celiac, or you may have a non-Celiac gluten problem. If the latter is your case, no amount of eating gluten and testing will make you test positive for Celiac.

You may be able to go to a doctor, explain your dietary response and your genes, and they will label you as a Celiac/gluten intolerant.

Not sure which you are looking for.....I wish there was a simple answer!

Best of luck!

Gemini Experienced
Hello everyone. I am fairly new to this forum and I am looking for opinions. I went gluten free in Oct 2007 after many years of GI issues. I had absolutely no appetite and felt nauseous all the time. I had testing for celiac disease in April 2007 and even had a biopsy done- everything came back negative. I forgot about it for a few months until I started reading that it is possible for the tests to come back negative even if you really do have celiac disease. So I did the enterolab testing which was positive for gluten sensitivity and I discovered that I carry a double copy of the DQ2 gene.

Once I found out I had two genes I decided to try the gluten free diet. Well it has been amazing. I am not nauseous anymore and I actually feel hungry. I had been slowly losing weight (unintentionally) for the last few years and couldn't figure out why- now I have finally gained a few pounds and am almost back to a normal weight. It has been amazing- I literally used to wake up in the middle of the night feeling so sick I would be up for hours waiting for the feeling to pass. That hasn't happened since I went gluten free and it is so nice!

So here is my question- am I nuts to want an official diagnosis? Since I went gluten free I have found out that I have Hashimoto's thyroid disease. I also just had a bone scan done and found out I have pretty bad osteopenia- I am only 28 years old! All of these signs scream celiac disease to me. Everything of course except for the official tests accepted by the medical community. And I am a part of the medical community- I am a nurse practitioner and I think that is partly why I want an official diagnosis. As a group we are just trained to want the lab results that support a diagnosis. It isn't necessarily always a good thing to think that way but it is hard not to in this field. But I really do not ever want to go back on gluten again.

I have been thinking about going to see Dr. Green at Columbia (I live in NY) but don't want to waste my time (or money) if he is just going to brush me off and tell me I have to go back on gluten. Has anyone ever seen him? Well if you have read this far I thank you and I welcome any insight or opinions.

Jen

Jen....I have all the problems you mentioned in your post....Hashimoto's, osteopenia, the double DQ2 Celiac genes and I have an official diagnosis. I should clarify....I did the blood work and failed all the tests done, with huge numbers, so I know beyond a shadow of a doubt that I have celiac disease. My response to the gluten-free diet was phenomenal and because I was so sick at the time, I opted out of the biopsy to start the diet. If I hadn't, I would have wound up in the hospital and that idea was not appealing to me.

I would state without any doubt that the reason you tested negative was your age.....you haven't triggered long enough to do the damage that would show up in the testing. I went 20 years with every single, classic Celiac symptom without a diagnosis because it probably took that long before the damage was great enough to show. That, coupled with a clueless medical profession, did my body harm.

The hardest thing that people with chronic disease face is a medical profession that doesn't

look at the whole picture a patient presents with and relies on lab testing that is imperfect.

If you want an "official" diagnosis, you will have to go back to eating gluten, feel horrible while you do, have your bones become more damaged that they already are and your thyroid will be difficult to control because you are ingesting gluten. I only brought mine under control after I went gluten-free.

I know your training tells you to do one thing but your body will suffer greatly if you continue to eat gluten. You know you have it from all of your symptoms and, now, the start of multiple autoimmune diseases. We need people like yourself who may be able to change the way celiac disease is diagnosed!

Celiconfused Newbie

I don't know if you saw my earlier post, but there has been some confusion in my diagnosis. I'm so glad I am not the only one who is foregoing the biopsy. I felt so awful when I went off my gluten-free diet, I thought "What the hell" I must have it. My confusion was I had a FP doctor tell me I was and a GI doctor tell me he wasn't so sure. But right now I don't really have the money to pay my insurance deductible to have the biopsy done.

I too wanted an "official" diagnosis from somebody. But I actually think it is better for me now to get to feeling better like I had been. And if sticking to a gluten-free diet makes me feel good and I don't have to have the scope done, then I am happy.

Leslie :D

Gemini Experienced
I don't know if you saw my earlier post, but there has been some confusion in my diagnosis. I'm so glad I am not the only one who is foregoing the biopsy. I felt so awful when I went off my gluten-free diet, I thought "What the hell" I must have it. My confusion was I had a FP doctor tell me I was and a GI doctor tell me he wasn't so sure. But right now I don't really have the money to pay my insurance deductible to have the biopsy done.

I too wanted an "official" diagnosis from somebody. But I actually think it is better for me now to get to feeling better like I had been. And if sticking to a gluten-free diet makes me feel good and I don't have to have the scope done, then I am happy.

Leslie :D

GI docs will only diagnose with flattened villi, period. That is such an injustice to those who aren't showing enough damage yet. Would they ask a diabetic to ingest sugar if their blood work was iffy? I realize some will have to undergo a biopsy for peace of mind or to investigate further if their blood work was negative or borderline but for others, like myself, it was not necessary. I was a poster child for celiac disease.....skinny, skinny arms and body, weight at 98 pounds and falling, and all those lovely other symptoms that make life miserable. I even went gluten-free before the blood work and I still failed the tests with high numbers so it didn't take a brain surgeon to figure it out. The clincher came when I started the diet and 3 days later my most severe symptoms started to go away. If you look at the entire picture, you can figure it out. It's great that you are comfortable with your diagnosis because it will save much aggravation and illness down the road.

Celiconfused Newbie
GI docs will only diagnose with flattened villi, period. That is such an injustice to those who aren't showing enough damage yet. Would they ask a diabetic to ingest sugar if their blood work was iffy? I realize some will have to undergo a biopsy for peace of mind or to investigate further if their blood work was negative or borderline but for others, like myself, it was not necessary. I was a poster child for celiac disease.....skinny, skinny arms and body, weight at 98 pounds and falling, and all those lovely other symptoms that make life miserable. I even went gluten-free before the blood work and I still failed the tests with high numbers so it didn't take a brain surgeon to figure it out. The clincher came when I started the diet and 3 days later my most severe symptoms started to go away. If you look at the entire picture, you can figure it out. It's great that you are comfortable with your diagnosis because it will save much aggravation and illness down the road.

I think the GI doctor has his doubts with me because I am so not the "poster child." I am overweight and do not have skin problems, but mine is mainly in my intestine and horrible bowel movements. I did notice went I went gluten-free that my aches and pains seemed to go away as well. I can't wait to start feeling better again. I wish I never went off the gluten-free for my biopsy that I ended up cancelling!

jenrn Apprentice

Thanks everyone for your input. I guess I am just going to have to accept the fact that I will never have the official diagnosis unless they come up with some other test someday that you can take even if you are gluten free. You are all right though- going back on gluten just to repeat the testing would not be a smart thing to do.

One good thing about being gluten free myself is that I am very aware of testing for celiac disease in my patients. And I agree with all of you- it is still not on the radar for many health care providers. It isn't even mentioned in the main text book I used in grad school for my nurse practitioner degree. And I have started to spread the word as much as I can to my colleagues in the medical field. I think that slowly more people are becoming aware of this common disease.

Jen


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Gemini Experienced
Thanks everyone for your input. I guess I am just going to have to accept the fact that I will never have the official diagnosis unless they come up with some other test someday that you can take even if you are gluten free. You are all right though- going back on gluten just to repeat the testing would not be a smart thing to do.

One good thing about being gluten free myself is that I am very aware of testing for celiac disease in my patients. And I agree with all of you- it is still not on the radar for many health care providers. It isn't even mentioned in the main text book I used in grad school for my nurse practitioner degree. And I have started to spread the word as much as I can to my colleagues in the medical field. I think that slowly more people are becoming aware of this common disease.

Jen

Thanks, Jen.....it's people like yourself that could change the way celiac disease/GS are diagnosed. Keep up the good work!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - knitty kitty replied to Ginger38's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      23

      Shingles - Could It Be Related to Gluten/ Celiac

    2. - knitty kitty replied to Charlie1946's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      33

      Severe severe mouth pain

    3. - Bogger replied to Bogger's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      2

      Osteoporosis: Does the body start rebuilding bones after starting a gluten-free diet?

    4. - trents replied to Charlie1946's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      33

      Severe severe mouth pain

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,083
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    AASpahic
    Newest Member
    AASpahic
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • knitty kitty
      @Ginger38,  Are you taking a B Complex vitamin?  Vitamin D?  Thiamine in the form TTFD or Benfotiamine? I think increasing my B Complex vitamins and taking additional Thiamine and Vitamin C and zinc helps along with the Lysine.  
    • knitty kitty
      There's simple dietary changes that can be done to improve Barrett's esophagus.  There are vitamins that improve Barrett's esophagus --- most of the B vitamins! Reducing sugary foods and drinks will help.  A diet high in simple carbohydrates can deplete Thiamine and other B vitamins needed to process them into energy. Eating green leafy vegetables helps.  Green leafy vegetables are high in Folate and Riboflavin.       Dietary sugar and Barrett’s esophagus https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5725502/#:~:text=The major finding of the,and sugar consumption [13].     Dietary intake of vegetables, folate, and antioxidants and the risk of Barrett's esophagus https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23420329/    Intakes of dietary folate and other B vitamins are associated with risks of esophageal adenocarcinoma, Barrett's esophagus, and reflux esophagitis https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24132576/    Associations between dietary folate intake and risks of esophageal, gastric and pancreatic cancers: an overall and dose-response meta-analysis https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5689728/     Dietary vitamin B intake and the risk of esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6225909/#:~:text=A statistically significant%2C inverse association,an increased risk of EC.    Intake of Dietary One-Carbon Metabolism-Related B Vitamins and the Risk of Esophageal Cancer: A Dose-Response Meta-Analysis https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6073467/    Dietary riboflavin deficiency induces ariboflavinosis and esophageal epithelial atrophy in association with modification of gut microbiota in rats https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32458157/    Association of Vitamin D and Parathyroid Hormone With Barrett's Esophagus (parathyroid needs Pyridoxine B6) https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30180151/   "let food be your medicine, let medicine be your food. "
    • Bogger
      Thanks for your reply I’m a nearly 69yr old female. My only medications are Fosamax and Lamotrigine for seizures. Thank you for that drugs.com link! There are soooo many common side effects for Reclast and almost nothing for Fosamax. Since it’s working well and I haven’t had any side effects from Fosamax (stomach bleeding, pain or upset) my doctor recommends it first over Reclast. Reclast is introduced into a vein thus bypassing the stomach which avoids all those stomach issues. But, once it’s in me, it’s there for a year or so. Any complications can’t be undone. With Reclast, I’m concerned about not being able to treat dental issues, several weeks of bone pain and the chance, although rare, of kidney damage. Plus all those other dozens of common side effects. It’s a very effective drug but looks pretty complicated to deal with. Hopefully I’m not just being a big chicken. In 2018 I fell and broke my ankle in two places. It took three screws to put it back together which is normal for that surgery. There was no mention of any difficulty or signs of bone loss. Thanks to my dog, I fell about a month ago onto a concrete floor with thin carpet. I landed on my left hip, then my spine, one vertebrae at a time, then clunked my head on the door frame. Twisted my wrist too. It was all in slow motion waiting to feel a crack that didn’t happen. Went to the ER tho. Amazingly, I didn’t even see any bruises. Thanks again for that link. I need to read through it some more. My doctor’s appt is next week when I’ll make the big decision.   
    • trents
      But for someone with Barrett's like @Charlie1946, long term PPI therapy might be necessary. 
    • Caligirl57
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.