Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Want To Ask Doc For Endoscopy


misulli

Recommended Posts

misulli Rookie

Hi,

I had a negative test for Celiac, but came back positive with Enterolab and also had two copies of the HQA-DL2 gene. I called to ask to speak with him and am waiting a call back. I am almost certain he is going to say no and that it is not warrented. While I do believe in Entrolab, I am not sure I want to bring this up with him. Any thoughts???

Michelle


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Ursa Major Collaborator

Are you on a gluten-free diet now? If you are, an endoscopy will be useless, as it will likely come back a false negative anyway.

With you testing with Enterolab, I assume you have symptoms pointing towards celiac disease. That, combined with having two celiac disease genes, should, in my opinion, be confirmation enough.

On the other hand, if you are still doubting and haven't started the diet yet, an endoscopy with biopsy may confirm celiac disease (and MAY is the word here, as those biopsies are hit and miss and undamaged spots might be biopsied, entirely missing the damaged ones, giving you a false negative).

misulli Rookie

I tried starting the diet, but went back on gluten on the chance that I would be getting the endoscope. I don't want to skew the results. I am just anxious that he will totally dismiss the enterolab results and the genetic results.

Ursa Major Collaborator

Well, he might dismiss the Enterlob results, but he can't dismiss your genes. Those are the 'official' celiac disease genes, and together with your symptoms suggest celiac disease. Blood work is very unreliable (false positives are almost unheard of, but false negatives abound), and quite a few people here had a positive biopsy after negative blood work.

Mind you, I am not sure why you spent all that money on Enterolab, and then still want a biopsy and won't go gluten-free right away.

Still, I can't see your doctor refusing to do the biopsy with the evidence you have now. Just make sure it is soon, because you will suffer needlessly and cause further damage while still eating gluten foods.

Did your Enterolab tests show malabsorption? If yes, you might as well be tested for nutritional deficiencies while you are at your doctor's office. Ask to be tested especially for levels of ferritin, vitamin D, calcium and magnesium, potassium, vitamin K, B12 and B6. Also, it is a good idea to have a bone scan done, because celiac disease often causes osteoporosis, even in children.

If you end up having the biopsy, please make sure you start the gluten-free diet right afterwards, regardless of the results. Because you undoubtedly have celiac disease.

misulli Rookie

Thanks. I agree. I guess it would be nice to have some support from the medical community and maybe show the doc that a negative blood test does not always mean negative and to not put us all in the "IBS" category. My most recent bloodwork has been on the lower side of normal for B12, in addition to being slightly anemic. I also just did some bloodwork for life insurance and I had a low level of a something that was indicative of malnutrition. I have always been underweight (I am 110lbs at 5'4') and this is about the most I have weighed in some time. I guess it would be good to have a definitive diagnosis as opposed to a self-diagnosis which may not carry much weight in the medical community.

ravenwoodglass Mentor
Thanks. I agree. I guess it would be nice to have some support from the medical community and maybe show the doc that a negative blood test does not always mean negative and to not put us all in the "IBS" category. My most recent bloodwork has been on the lower side of normal for B12, in addition to being slightly anemic. I also just did some bloodwork for life insurance and I had a low level of a something that was indicative of malnutrition. I have always been underweight (I am 110lbs at 5'4') and this is about the most I have weighed in some time. I guess it would be good to have a definitive diagnosis as opposed to a self-diagnosis which may not carry much weight in the medical community.

If you are forming antibodies you have a 'diagnosis' IMHO. You may find after you have been gluten free that seeing doctors on a regular basis is no longer needed. Why do you care what the medical community thinks if the diet restores you to health that should be proof enough for them. I didn't need to see my doctor for almost 2 years after diagnosis. I just didn't get sick and was not about to go spend money just to say, hey I feel great. My doctor thought I changed doctors and didn't recognize me when I went back in. He saw the difference in me and put 'celiac' in the diagnosis column with no reservations whatsoever.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,159
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Greymo
    Newest Member
    Greymo
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Let me hasten to add that if you will be undergoing an endoscopy/biopsy, it is critical that you do not begin efforts to reduce gluten beforehand. Doing so will render the results invalid as it will allow the small bowel lining to heal and, therefore, obscure the damage done by celiac disease which is what the biopsy is looking for.
    • Scott Adams
      This article, and the comments below it, may be helpful:    
    • Scott Adams
      That’s a really tough situation. A few key points: as mentioned, a gluten challenge does require daily gluten for several weeks to make blood tests meaningful, but negative tests after limited exposure aren’t reliable. Dermatitis herpetiformis can also be tricky to diagnose unless the biopsy is taken from normal-looking skin next to a lesion. Some people with celiac or DH don’t react every time they’re exposed, so lack of symptoms doesn’t rule it out. Given your history and family cancer risk, this is something I’d strongly discuss with a celiac-experienced gastroenterologist or dermatologist before attempting a challenge on your own, so risks and benefits are clearly weighed.
    • Greymo
      https://celiac.org/glutenexposuremarkers/    yes, two hours after accidents ingesting gluten I am vomiting and then diarrhea- then exhaustion and a headache. see the article above- There is research that shows our reactions.
    • trents
      Concerning the EMA positive result, the EMA was the original blood test developed to detect celiac disease and has largely been replaced by the tTG-IGA which has a similar reliability confidence but is much less expensive to run. Yes, a positive EMA is very strong evidence of celiac disease but not foolproof. In the UK, a tTG-IGA score that is 10x normal or greater will often result in foregoing the endoscopy/biopsy. Weaker positives on the tTG-IGA still trigger the endoscopy/biopsy. That protocol is being considered in the US but is not yet in place.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.