Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Follow Up Appointment


Glutina

Recommended Posts

Glutina Rookie

Hello again everyone! I hope your gluten free lives are going well :)

I just wanted to update on the follow-up appointeny I had with my doc, as it was a bit surprising to me. Quick overview:

So...I was tested by a G.I. specialist in January for Celiac via bloodwork. (He immediately asked if I had ever been tested for it and about my family history and so on...he said I basically had all the symptoms.) I was thrilled that he took the time to think of what might be causing all my "washroom" and fatigue issues, and my general sense of feeling "off", not to mention the excruciatingly painful "attacks" I would get in my gut after eating certain things, more specifically soy sauce and imitation crab meat and bread. (All big gluten nono's!) So, he also set me up to have an ultrasound to rule out anything more severe with any organs or intestinal abnormalities, etc.

In the follow up appointment I had last friday, he confirmed that my celiac blood work was negative, but at the higher end of normal for something (ack---forget exactly what :blink: ) but not high enough to read celiac. He also said it was not the specific celiac-gluten antibody but something else that showed a high reactivity...? Anyhoo---the ultrasound was normal, thank goodness! I also told him that I had tried going gluten free after our first appointment when he mentioned possible celiac because I did not want to deal with my symptoms another day! He asked how it was going and I said GREAT! I asked him about the possiblilty of a false negative and he said that yes, those are quite possible, but here's where he surprised me: he said that since I am feeling better going gluten free, whether or not I have celiac, he owuld give the same advice to follow a gluten free diet. He also said that if I WANT the biopsy, he'll do it, but he left it up to me. Up to me! Wow!!! He also said something else that I had never thought of....that going gluten-free could be helping me to avoid other intolerances which ultimately leads to the same path: a normal, symptom-free life! He also said that going gluten free will complicate any further testing, and so he is also leaving that up to me!!! He said that since gluten free is working for me, I need to stick with it no matter if I have celiac (unlikely), gluten sensitivity or even wheat sensitivity. It is so nice to know that if I have any further concerns or if symptoms start up again that he has told me to come back and get further testing if I feel I need it.

I just thought I would share a positive GI specialist story with you all...and to remember that the diagnosis is ultimately the same for celiac disease or gluten sensitivity. AND, more importantly, that your health is in YOUR hands and not to stop at one doctor's opinion (or lack of one as I have also experienced with other misinformed doctors).

Your friend in this gluten free life,

-Glutina


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



ravenwoodglass Mentor

It sounds like you have a great doctor who is more concerned with the health of his patient than a lot of them are. Congrats. I think the home page here has a place for celiac savvy doctors to be listed, you may want to add him to the list.

Glutina Rookie

I agree that I am lucky in finding him as a specialist! I will add him to the list of "good ones" :)

-Glutina

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - trents replied to Roses8721's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      8

      GI DX celiac despite neg serology and no biopsy

    2. - Roses8721 posted a topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      0

      gluten-free Oatmeal

    3. - Roses8721 replied to Roses8721's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      8

      GI DX celiac despite neg serology and no biopsy

    4. - Scott Adams replied to Ginger38's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      5

      Shingles - Could It Be Related to Gluten/ Celiac

    5. - Scott Adams replied to Xravith's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      3

      Challenges eating gluten before biopsy


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,473
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Kelly Hannon
    Newest Member
    Kelly Hannon
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):




  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Certainly, it would b wise to have a gene test done if your physician is open to it as it would provide some more data to understand what's going on. But keep in mind that the genetic test for celiac disease cannot be used as to diagnose celiac disease, only to establish the potential to develop active celiac disease. About 40% of the general population possess one or both of the primary genes known to be associated with the development of active celiac disease but only about 1% of the population actually develop active celiac disease. So, the gene test is an effective "rule out" tool but not an effective diagnostic tool.
    • Roses8721
      Had Quaker gluten-free oatmeal last night and my stomach is a mess today. NO flu but def stomach stuff. Anyone else?
    • Roses8721
      So you would be good with the diagnosis and not worry to check genetics etc etc? Appreciate your words!
    • Scott Adams
      As recommended by @Flash1970, you may want to get this: https://www.amazon.com/Curist-Lidocaine-Maximum-Strength-Topical/dp/B09DN7GR14/
    • Scott Adams
      For those who will likely remain gluten-free for life anyway due to well-known symptoms they have when eating gluten, my general advice is to ignore any doctors who push to go through a gluten challenge to get a formal diagnosis--and this is especially true for those who have severe symptoms when they eat gluten. It can take months, or even years to recover from such a challenge, so why do this if you already know that gluten is the culprit and you won't be eating it anyway?  Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If your symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet it would likely signal NCGS--but those in this group will usually have negative tests, or at best, elevated antibodies that don't reach the level of official positive. Unfortunately test results for celiac disease are not always definitive, and many errors can be made when doing an endoscopy for celiac disease, and they can happen in many ways, for example not collecting the samples in the right areas, not collecting enough samples, or not interpreting the results properly and giving a Marsh score.  Many biopsy results can also be borderline, where there may be certain damage that could be associated with celiac disease, but it just doesn't quite reach the level necessary to make a formal diagnosis. The same is true for blood test results. Over the last 10 years or so a new "Weak Positive" range has been created by many labs for antibody results, which can simply lead to confusion (some doctors apparently believe that this means the patient can decide if they want more testing or to go gluten-free). There is no "Weak Negative" category, for example. Many patients are not told to eat gluten daily, lots of it, for the 6-8 week period leading up to their blood test, nor asked whether or not they've been eating gluten. Some patients even report to their doctors that they've been gluten-free for weeks or months before their blood tests, yet their doctors incorrectly say nothing to them about how this can affect their test, and create false negative results. Many people are not routinely given a total IGA blood test when doing a blood screening, which can lead to false negative interpretations if the patient has low IGA. We've seen on this forum many times that some doctors who are not fully up on how interpret the blood test results can tell patients that the don't need to follow a gluten-free diet or get more testing because only 1 of the 2 or 3 tests done in their panel is positive (wrong!), and the other 1 or 2 tests are negative.  Dermatologists often don't know how to do a proper skin biopsy for dermatitis herpetiformis, and when they do it wrongly their patient will continue to suffer with terrible DH itching, and all the risks associated with celiac disease. For many, the DH rash is the only presentation of celiac disease. These patients may end up on strong prescriptions for life to control their itching which also may have many negative side effects, for example Dapsone. Unfortunately many people will continue to suffer needlessly and eat gluten due to these errors in performing or interpreting celiac disease tests, but luckily some will find out about non-celiac gluten sensitivity on their own and go gluten-free and recover from their symptoms. Consider yourself lucky if you've figured out that gluten is the source of your health issues, and you've gone gluten-free, because many people will never figure this out.    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.