Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Parents With Celiac


linsmad

Recommended Posts

linsmad Rookie

I am so confused. My DH has had celiac for 5 years. At the time he was diagnosed I mentioned it to my children's pediatrician who wasn't in favor of blood testing unless we were comfortable continuing on to an endoscopy. He said that the blood tests are not that reliable, and the only way to know for sure would be through endoscopy. My children (ages 6 & 3) show no signs of celiac. Another pediatrician advised that unless the children show any signs of celiac, again advised against blood testing. I have heard much information contradicting this. I met someone recently who was advised not only to have her children tested, but her immediate family as well. My DH has four siblings, and none have considered being tested either?? What have you done? What should I recommend to in-laws as well? Are the blood tests more reliable with adults? Can they get a simple yes/no from a blood test, and then test again later if it showed nothing? Any advise would be much appreciated!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Guest j_mommy

I had my child tested right away after I was diagnosed. The blood tests are unreliable for young kids. From what I understand they are more reliable for adults and older kids. It is atleast a place to start. I am sure that it was passed from my dad's side of the family. My paternal gma and my father refuse to get tested but my siblings have been tested.

cruelshoes Enthusiast

From University of Chicago Celiac Disease Center

Open Original Shared Link

When an individual is diagnosed with celiac disease, the entire family learns that they must be tested on a regular basis for the condition. First degree relatives (parent, child, sibling) have a 1 in 22 chance of developing celiac disease in their lifetimes; in second degree relatives, (aunt, uncle, cousin, grandparent) the risk is 1 in 39.

Dr. Green recommends that first degree relatives be tested every 2 years, more often in the event of symptoms. While tests can be unreliable in the very young, positive results are not unheard of. I know of several diagnosed celiacs (bloodwork and biopsy) that are under 2 years of age. The most important thing to remember is that a negative bloodwork result does not clear one for life.

We had both our children tested immediately after I was diagnosed. One was positive and one was negative. I want to stress that lack of symptoms does not mean lack of celiac. My son was completely asymptomatic when he was diagnosed, but his tTg and intestinal damage in the biopsy was nearly as severe as mine was. He was well on the road to being a very sick boy. Many celiacs have no outward symptoms yet have internal damage on the severe end of the spectrum.

If it were me, I would definitely get the kids tested, and encourage DH's parents to be tested as well. If the results are negative, you can play it by ear from there.

Hope this helps.

Puddy Explorer
From University of Chicago Celiac Disease Center

Open Original Shared Link

Dr. Green recommends that first degree relatives be tested every 2 years, more often in the event of symptoms. While tests can be unreliable in the very young, positive results are not unheard of. I know of several diagnosed celiacs (bloodwork and biopsy) that are under 2 years of age. The most important thing to remember is that a negative bloodwork result does not clear one for life.

We had both our children tested immediately after I was diagnosed. One was positive and one was negative. I want to stress that lack of symptoms does not mean lack of celiac. My son was completely asymptomatic when he was diagnosed, but his tTg and intestinal damage in the biopsy was nearly as severe as mine was. He was well on the road to being a very sick boy. Many celiacs have no outward symptoms yet have internal damage on the severe end of the spectrum.

If it were me, I would definitely get the kids tested, and encourage DH's parents to be tested as well. If the results are negative, you can play it by ear from there.

Hope this helps.

Puddy Explorer

Hi CruelShoes,

When you said one of your children was positive and one negative and then you mentioned that your son was asymptomatic, was your son the positive one? I'm confused about the testing getting mixed information about whether I should have my children tested and which tests to have done. If they are asymptomatic (as they all are now), will they still get a positive blood test result if they have the disease? And if they come back negative, which I know means they still might have the disease, should they have the gene test so they will know whether they have to worry about the disease in the future? Thanks for your help.

cruelshoes Enthusiast
Hi CruelShoes,

When you said one of your children was positive and one negative and then you mentioned that your son was asymptomatic, was your son the positive one? I'm confused about the testing getting mixed information about whether I should have my children tested and which tests to have done. If they are asymptomatic (as they all are now), will they still get a positive blood test result if they have the disease? And if they come back negative, which I know means they still might have the disease, should they have the gene test so they will know whether they have to worry about the disease in the future? Thanks for your help.

Hi, Puddy. Sorry I wasn't clear. :) My son and daughter were both asymptomatic. My son's bloodwork was positive and my daughter's was negative. We proceeded with the biopsy on my son, and he had significant villi damage. We have not done any further testing on my daughter, but will have bloodwork done during her annual physical in a few months. If her bloodwork is negative, we will assume the position of watchful waiting and do it again in another 2 years. We also had our youngest tested at 9 months due to some constipation problems, but she was negative. We will test her again at 2, an age at which the testing becomes much more reliable. And so it will go every 2 years.

Many people with celiac never have any symptoms at all, even if they are positive on the bloodwork and biopsy. My son, although he had no symptoms before diagnosis, now reacts very quickly and strongly to the smallest ingestion.

I think the gene test is fine if you have the money and are interested. A genetic negative result can make celiac less of an issue to be concerned about. But, scientists have recently identified Open Original Shared Link that are responsible for celiac. Since most genetic testing is not going to involve all of those alleles (most test only DQ2 and DQ8), getting a negative gene test may not be a 100% negative forever. I do know of a handful of people who do not have the genes, but are biopsy proven celiacs. We have not had the gene testing done on our as-yet asymptomatic kids.

Hope this has helped and not made things even more confusing. :)

Puddy Explorer

Thanks so much, CruelShoes. No, that made things alot clearer for me. I will have them get the blood test as my GI doc said and then if they are negative, I'll just have them do it again in a couple years. I guess the gene test isn't necessary at this time and if they want to have it done themselves in the future, they can. My GI doc ran all the blood tests and the gene test on me the day I had my endoscopy. I just assumed the gene test was part of the celiac panel, but I guess not. Thanks again.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



linsmad Rookie

Thank you all so much for your replies. Thank you especially cruelshoes. I will check out the link that you forwarded. I will do more research, but it sounds as if the bloods tests are a good starting point for us. I will recommend blood test for my husband's family as well. They are not a forever guarentee, but at least a good starting point!!

cruelshoes Enthusiast

More info about family members and testing:

Open Original Shared Link

Q: Why do my family members need to be screened for celiac disease?

When the diagnosis is established in one family member, their first- degree relatives (parents, siblings and children) should have blood tests for celiac disease. This is because at least 10% of family members will have the disease, even if they are asymptomatic. Screening is also recommended for second-degree relatives (grandparents, grandchildren, aunts, uncles and cousins) as they are also at an increased risk for celiac disease. Family members who already have an autoimmune disease are at a greatly increased risk to have celiac disease (25%).

The reasons to diagnose family members prior to the development of symptoms include the prevention autoimmune diseases and malignancy.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,961
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Noa
    Newest Member
    Noa
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      If black seed oil is working for his Afib, stick to it, but if not, I can say that ablation therapy is no big deal--my mother was out of the procedure in about 1 hour and went home that evening, and had zero negative effects from the treatment. PS - I would recommend that your husband get an Apple watch to monitor his Afib--there is an app and it will take readings 24/7 and give reports on how much of the time he's in it. Actual data like this should be what should guide his treatment.
    • Jacki Espo
      This happened to me as well. What’s weirder is that within a couple hours of taking paxlovid it subsided. I thought maybe I got glutened but after reading your post not so sure. 
    • Mari
      Hi Tiffany. Thank you for writing your dituation and  circumstancesin such detail and so well writte, too. I particularly noticed what you wrote about brain for and feeling like your brain is swelling and I know from my own experiences that's how it feel and your brain really does swell and you get migraines.    Way back when I was in my 20s I read a book by 2 MD allergist and they described their patient who came in complaining that her brain, inside her cranium, was swelling  and it happened when she smelled a certain chemical she used in her home. She kept coming back and insisting her brain actually swelled in her head. The Drs couldn't explain this problem so they, with her permission, performed an operation where they made a small opening through her cranium, exposed her to the chemical then watched as she brain did swell into the opening. The DRs were amazed but then were able to advise her to avoid chemicals that made her brain swell. I remember that because I occasionally had brain fog then but it was not a serious problem. I also realized that I was becoming more sensitive to chemicals I used in my work in medical laboratories. By my mid forties the brain fog and chemicals forced me to leave my  profession and move to a rural area with little pollution. I did not have migraines. I was told a little later that I had a more porous blood brain barrier than other people. Chemicals in the air would go up into my sinused and leak through the blood brain barrier into my brain. We have 2 arteries  in our neck that carry blood with the nutrients and oxygen into the brain. To remove the fluids and used blood from the brain there are only capillaries and no large veins to carry it away so all those fluids ooze out much more slowly than they came in and since the small capillaries can't take care of extra fluid it results in swelling in the face, especially around the eyes. My blood flow into my brain is different from most other people as I have an arterial ischema, adefectiveartery on one side.   I have to go forward about 20 or more years when I learned that I had glaucoma, an eye problem that causes blindness and more years until I learned I had celiac disease.  The eye Dr described my glaucoma as a very slow loss of vision that I wouldn't  notice until had noticeable loss of sight.  I could have my eye pressure checked regularly or it would be best to have the cataracts removed from both eyes. I kept putting off the surgery then just overnight lost most of the vision in my left eye. I thought at the I had been exposed to some chemical and found out a little later the person who livedbehind me was using some chemicals to build kayaks in a shed behind my house. I did not realize the signifance  of this until I started having appointments with a Dr. in a new building. New buildings give me brain fog, loss of balance and other problems I know about this time I experienced visual disturbances very similar to those experienced by people with migraines. I looked further online and read that people with glaucoma can suffer rapid loss of sight if they have silent migraines (no headache). The remedy for migraines is to identify and avoid the triggers. I already know most of my triggers - aromatic chemicals, some cleaning materials, gasoline and exhaust and mold toxins. I am very careful about using cleaning agents using mostly borax and baking powder. Anything that has any fragrance or smell I avoid. There is one brand of dishwashing detergent that I can use and several brands of  scouring powder. I hope you find some of this helpful and useful. I have not seen any evidence that Celiac Disease is involved with migraines or glaucoma. Please come back if you have questions or if what I wrote doesn't make senseto you. We sometimes haveto learn by experience and finding out why we have some problems. Take care.       The report did not mention migraines. 
    • Mari
      Hi Jmartes71 That is so much like my story! You probably know where Laytonville is and that's where I was living just before my 60th birthday when the new Dr. suggested I could have Celiacs. I didn't go on a gluten challange diet before having the Celiac panel blood test drawn. The results came back as equivical as one antibody level was very high but another, tissue transaminasewas normal. Itdid show I was  allergic to cows milk and I think hot peppers. I immediately went gluten free but did not go in for an endoscopy. I found an online lab online that would do the test to show if I had a main celiac gene (enterolab.com). The report came back that I had inherited a main celiac gene, DQ8, from one parent and a D!6 from the other parent. That combination is knows to sym[tons of celiac worse than just inheriting one main celiac gene. With my version of celiac disease I was mostly constipated but after going gluten-free I would have diarrhea the few times I was glutened either by cross contamination or eating some food containing gluten. I have stayed gluten-free for almost 20 years now and knew within a few days that it was right for me although my recovery has been slow.   When I go to see a  medical provide and tell them I have celiacs they don't believe me. The same when I tell them that I carry a main celiac gene, the DQ8. It is only when I tell them that I get diarrhea after eating gluten that they realize that I might have celiac disease. Then they will order th Vitamin B12 and D3 that I need to monitor as my B12 levels can go down very fast if I'm not taking enough of it. Medical providers haven't been much help in my recovery. They are not well trained in this problem. I really hope this helps ypu. Take care.      
    • knitty kitty
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.