Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Positive Igg/negative Biopsy?


kkv

Recommended Posts

kkv Newbie

i just had a series of blood tests, my IGG was at 36 and then an endoscopy biopsy was negative and the doctors have NO answers other than to take probiotics...

does anyone have experience with this? It is so FRUSTRATING!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



jayhawkmom Enthusiast
does anyone have experience with this? It is so FRUSTRATING!

Yep.

All my other tests were within range, some on the high side of "normal." My antigliadin IgG - however, was 67 - the negative reference range is less than 11.

My allergist informed me that there was no reason to follow a gluten free diet.

My GI - on the other hand - said it was definitely worth further investigation.

Endoscopy/biopsies were normal - 100%.

I was advised to *try* removing gluten from my diet to see if it made any difference. It has. A lot.

A month after I'd gone gluten-free, I had the blood tests run over again... because my allergist insisted that they ran the wrong tests. They ran the SAME tests over again, but included the total serum IgA - which was forgotten the first time. After a month of being gluten-free - my antigliadin IgG's had dropped down to 40-something.

At that time, my allergist acknowledged that I "might" have an issue with gluten, and should stick to the lifestyle.

I totally understand how frustrating it is. And, there are MANY of us here in the same boat.

chasing4 Rookie

My dd just got diagnosed a couple weeks ago. Her IGG levels showed she could have Celiac, but her biopsy was in normal levels. He said that she has gluten sensitivity and has not technically diagnosed her with Celiac yet, but he still told us to cut out gluten from her diet. And ever since we did that, she has been so much happier than she has been in a long time.

Willow5 Rookie

I had and initial Igg of 39 and all other tests came in within normal limit. I have been mostly gluten-free for the last 2 years and I notice definate differances in my levels of energy when I stick with gluten-free and have a rash that appears within hours of a cheeting experience.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,208
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Deeknip
    Newest Member
    Deeknip
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Fayeb23
      Thank you that’s really helpful, hopeful won’t have to have a biopsy.
    • RMJ
      That means the normal range (i.e. not celiac disease) would be a result less than 14.99.  Your result is WAY above that. Some gastroenterologists would diagnose that as celiac disease even without a confirming biopsy because it is more than ten times the top of the normal range.
    • Redanafs
      Hi everyone. Back in 2022 I had blood work drawn for iga ext gliadin. Since then I’ve developed worse stomach issues and all other health issues. My doctor just said cut out gluten. He did no further testing. Please see my test results attached. I just need some direction cause I feel so ill and the stomach pain is becoming worse. Can this test show indications for other gastrointestinal diseases?
    • Fayeb23
      Thank you. These were the results TTG ABS NUMERICAL: > 250.0 U/mL [< 14.99]  Really don’t understand the results!
    • Scott Adams
      Clearly from what you've said the info on Dailymed is much more up to date than the other site, which hasn't been updated since 2017. The fact that some companies might be repackaging drugs does not mean the info on the ingredients is not correct.
×
×
  • Create New...