Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Can Low Iron Cause False Results?


sazzie

Recommended Posts

sazzie Rookie

Hi,

Sorry for more questions but now i am more confused than before!

I had a blood test and my ferratin (?) level was quite low (20-120 being normal mine was 10)

I tested weakly positive on my blood test for celiacs:

EMA was weak

ttg level was 5 with anything <5 being neg.

I went and saw the specialist today and he basically told me that there was only a very very small chance that i had celiac, and seemed more concerned about the fact that i had low iron than the results of the above tests.

He commented that it was probably from being pregnant that my iron stores were still low questioned me about how much meat i ate, did i take iron tablets ect... he said that my low iron could have skewed things up. however i didnt think iron had anything to do with the blood tests?

So would my low iron levels cause the above tests to be wrong?

I have no symptoms at all and according to the local hospital i am looking at at least a 10month wait for the biopsy, however if the above test can be wrong i really dont want to do a biopsy.

If the above levels are that low would anything even show up on a biopsy anyway?

if my biopsy is negative why would i have a weak ema test? As from what i have read there is basically no way that test can be wrong?

what do you think?

Thank you for your replys,

Lisa


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



dollamasgetceliac? Explorer

I am new at this , but I am reading Dr. Peter Green's book Celiac Disease a hidden epidemic , what I gather from his book that after a pregnancy a n existing predisposition for Celiac can start with varying symptoms: one of which is Anemia, which i had as well. I was told to eat steak and always with orange juice for better absorbtion and was put on Iron suplaments. the symptoms went away. Not untill now I have severe abdominal pain, Migrains you name it ! all seems to be related to Celiacs ,I tested negative a few times and now suddenly it is positive.

Ursa Major Collaborator

First of all, your doctor didn't do the whole celiac disease panel when he did the tests. But your ttg level being so high certainly means something!

Anemia is one of the most common celiac disease symptoms. If your celiac disease was just triggered recently, the damage to your villi may not have progressed to where your blood work would be positive, and neither would a biopsy.

Have you tried the gluten-free diet? If you find an obvious improvement in your health by being on the gluten-free diet, you would really have your answer. Low iron is the result of malabsorption of essential nutrients and won't really be fixed until you fix the cause. Which may be celiac disease.

I wouldn't wait for a biopsy to try the gluten-free diet. But that is me, and you will have to make your own decision. Just know that if it is celiac disease a few months can make a huge difference as to how sick you will get if you keep eating gluten.

Nobody can make you eat gluten, you don't have to do what your doctor says, it is your own decision.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Scott Adams replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      7

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    2. - Scott Adams replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    3. - deanna1ynne replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    4. - cristiana replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      7

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,436
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Vivien Armstrong
    Newest Member
    Vivien Armstrong
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      In the U.S., most regular wheat breads are required to be enriched with certain B-vitamins and iron, but gluten-free breads are not required to be. Since many gluten-free products are not enriched, we usually encourage people with celiac disease to consider a multivitamin.  In the early 1900s, refined white flour replaced whole grains, and people began developing serious vitamin-deficiency diseases: Beriberi → caused by a lack of thiamin (vitamin B1) Pellagra → caused by a lack of niacin (vitamin B3) Anemia → linked to low iron and lack of folate By the 1930s–40s, these problems were common in the U.S., especially in poorer regions. Public-health officials responded by requiring wheat flour and the breads made from it to be “enriched” with thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, and iron. Folic acid was added later (1998) to prevent neural-tube birth defects. Why gluten-free bread isn’t required to be enriched? The U.S. enrichment standards were written specifically for wheat flour. Gluten-free breads use rice, tapioca, corn, sorghum, etc.—so they fall outside that rule—but they probably should be for the same reason wheat products are.
    • Scott Adams
      Keep in mind that there are drawbacks to a formal diagnosis, for example more expensive life and private health insurance, as well as possibly needing to disclose it on job applications. Normally I am in favor of the formal diagnosis process, but if you've already figured out that you can't tolerate gluten and will likely stay gluten-free anyway, I wanted to at least mention the possible negative sides of having a formal diagnosis. While I understand wanting a formal diagnosis, it sounds like she will likely remain gluten-free either way, even if she should test negative for celiac disease (Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If her symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet, it would likely signal NCGS).        
    • JoJo0611
    • deanna1ynne
      Thank you all so much for your advice and thoughts. We ended up having another scope and more bloodwork last week. All serological markers continue to increase, and the doc who did the scope said there villous atrophy visible on the scope — but we just got the biopsy pathology report back, and all it says is, “Duodenal mucosa with patchy increased intraepithelial lymphocytes, preserved villous architecture, and patchy foveolar metaplasia,” which we are told is still inconclusive…  We will have her go gluten free again anyway, but how soon would you all test again, if at all? How valuable is an official dx in a situation like this?
    • cristiana
      Thanks for this Russ, and good to see that it is fortified. I spend too much time looking for M&S gluten-free Iced Spiced Buns to have ever noticed this! That's interesting, Scott.  Have manufacturers ever said why that should be the case?  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.