Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):
  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Going Gluten Free Before Biopsy


Farmer Brown's Cow

Recommended Posts

Farmer Brown's Cow Newbie

Hi,

I'm new to the forum.

I've been in college for two years now. The first semester went off well. The 2nd was wrecked with stomach pain. The 3rd was horrible with beginning joint pain. This latest one had been a nightmare.

Like most people, the doctor didn't have an answer. It was a pure coincidence (my friend was being tested for Celiac--negative) that I even thought of Celiac. I've always had intermittent stomach issues. I thought it was stress. Too much food. Not enough.

I did a week off gluten--felt marginally better, went to the nurses and bam! Positive test results.

I had to wait until I got home to go to a GI. He recommended to got with a biopsy. The next available one is not until the August 1st.

I've been eating gluten ever since. I've felt so much better off gluten/dairy.

I was wondering if I could go off gluten for a month and a half then go back on two weeks before. I have felt horrible test past few weeks and would like to get back on track with my life.

What do you think? Any advice?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Aleshia Contributor
Hi,

I'm new to the forum.

I've been in college for two years now. The first semester went off well. The 2nd was wrecked with stomach pain. The 3rd was horrible with beginning joint pain. This latest one had been a nightmare.

Like most people, the doctor didn't have an answer. It was a pure coincidence (my friend was being tested for Celiac--negative) that I even thought of Celiac. I've always had intermittent stomach issues. I thought it was stress. Too much food. Not enough.

I did a week off gluten--felt marginally better, went to the nurses and bam! Positive test results.

I had to wait until I got home to go to a GI. He recommended to got with a biopsy. The next available one is not until the August 1st.

I've been eating gluten ever since. I've felt so much better off gluten/dairy.

I was wondering if I could go off gluten for a month and a half then go back on two weeks before. I have felt horrible test past few weeks and would like to get back on track with my life.

What do you think? Any advice?

I went off gluten for about a month and 1/2 and my GI told me that I would only need to be back on gluten for 5 -7 days for the biopsy. also my pediatrician just told me that the GI's at childrens hospital told them that a month off of gluten wouldn't affect a blood test... I disagree with that so will have the kids on gluten for about 3 days before hand just to be sure. but if you feel better off gluten it would be good to stay off of it as much as possible! just had my endoscopy done about 5 days ago and am expecting results back after the weekend. GI told me that he saw possible signs of celiac but said that could just be because he was looking for it so he wants to wait till the biopsy is back to say for sure.

Tim-n-VA Contributor

This is one of a group of related questions that come up a lot where the answer depends on how important a definitive medical diasnosis is to you. Some people have family issues where a self diagnosis isn't sufficient.

IF you need that definitive biopsy-based diagnois, you are much better off staying on gluten until August because different people heal quicker, etc. and you can't predict the impact of one month off and one month on. Any attempt to go back on gluten later for a second test will be even worse. Gluten reactions tend to get worse when you've been off gluten.

The two sides are that some people are okay with knowing they feel better without gluten and don't need the definitive diagnosis. Others want to know the definite diagnosis for family members who think its "all in your head". The other main reason for needing the definite diagnosis is that Celiac overlaps other diseases in symptoms and some can even cause false lab results. Since a disease involving a major body system (immune in this case) makes it more likely that you'll have other diseases in that system (thyroid, diabetes, etc.) there is at least some medical benefit to knowing exactly what is causing that reaction to gluten.

aikiducky Apprentice

I'd also vote for staying on gluten until the biopsy. You have a chance now to get a definitive diagnosis, don't risk it. You might end up with a borderline result which will either lead to a lot of discussion or to continued testing. I'd stay on gluten until the biopsy, then go gluten free immediately afterwards since you already know you feel better when you do.

Pauliina

hez Enthusiast

I think this is one of those times where you really need to know your own psyche. If long term, you know that you would only follow the diet if you had a formal dx, I would eat the gluten. If you have the psyche that does not need a firm dx go off. It really is a matter of personal choice. I was off the gluten for only two weeks before the biopsy. However, my damage is so severe I could have been off gluten for months and the results would have been the same. I know me, I need a firm dx. Otherwise, I would always question the results which would open the potential for me to be reckless with my diet.

I think you will find this forum a great resource! Welcome to the board!

Hez

tarnalberry Community Regular

Ask yourself why you need more than a positive blood test. Ask your doctor to. (The biopsy is going out of favor as "the gold standard" and more and more doctors are making final diagnoses on blood test panels alone.) Ask yourself if YOU need the biopsy over what you know to be true from experience. And if you do need it - and that's a perfectly fair answer - STAY ON GLUTEN. You don't know how fast your body is going to heal or be damaged by gluten, particularly considering the onset of your symptoms around a year ago. Staying off for almost three months, and then being back on for only a few weeks I would bet gives you pretty decent odds for a false negative. Why go through with a test if you're setting yourself up for inconclusive results?

Fiddle-Faddle Community Regular
I went off gluten for about a month and 1/2 and my GI told me that I would only need to be back on gluten for 5 -7 days for the biopsy. also my pediatrician just told me that the GI's at childrens hospital told them that a month off of gluten wouldn't affect a blood test... I disagree with that so will have the kids on gluten for about 3 days before hand just to be sure. but if you feel better off gluten it would be good to stay off of it as much as possible! just had my endoscopy done about 5 days ago and am expecting results back after the weekend. GI told me that he saw possible signs of celiac but said that could just be because he was looking for it so he wants to wait till the biopsy is back to say for sure.

Aleshia, I really believe that your GI and the GI's at Children's Hospital are wrong wrong WRONG.

It takes WAY more than 5-7 days to destroy the villi enough to get a positive biopsy. Most of the studies I have seen quoted on this board call for a minimum of 4 slices of bread for a minimum of 2 months, and even then, there is a possibility of having a negative result, as villi damage is often patchy and invisible to the naked eye after YEARS of gluten ingestion.

If your bloodwork was positive and your dietary response was positive, and if there's nothing else the doctor needs to look for (say, Barrett's Esophagus, which is a precancerous condition sometimes seen in untreated GERD), then an endoscopy simply pads the GI's bank account. You already have your answer, don't you?

There is no reason to do an invasive test if the answer is already known. And "First, do no harm," is supposed to be first on the doctor's priority list.

Obviously, gluten is doing you AND your child quite a bit of harm.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



grommet Newbie

It is crap that we have to eat what is making us ill to get a gold standard diagnosis, but you are setting yourself up for an inconclusive result if you go gluten-free now.

Make the best of the time you have left to eat what you want when you want. KFC, Pizzas etc, cos you'll never have 'em again.

I had been gluten-free for 2 years (not knowing anything about coeliac) and then tried for a diagnosis. I ate loads for 7 weeks and it was a negative biopsy. So no diagnosis. Are you prepared for that? If so then you have to do what you think is best.

For those who haven't seen it already - this is useful re clinical guidelines etc:

Open Original Shared Link

Farmer Brown's Cow Newbie

Thanks for the overwhelming support. I think I will stay on gluten. Since I come from an immigrant parents, it's much easier to explain a disease, than an intolerance.

Thanks everyone.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - knitty kitty replied to Jane02's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      9

      Desperately need a vitamin D supplement. I've reacted to most brands I've tried.

    2. - Jane02 replied to Jane02's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      9

      Desperately need a vitamin D supplement. I've reacted to most brands I've tried.

    3. - knitty kitty replied to Jane02's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      9

      Desperately need a vitamin D supplement. I've reacted to most brands I've tried.

    4. 0

      Penobscot Bay, Maine: Nurturing Gluten-Free Wellness Retreat with expert celiac dietitian, Melinda Dennis

    5. - Scott Adams replied to Jane02's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      9

      Desperately need a vitamin D supplement. I've reacted to most brands I've tried.

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,333
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Nicolah
    Newest Member
    Nicolah
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.6k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • knitty kitty
      @Jane02, I hear you about the kale and collard greens.  I don't do dairy and must eat green leafies, too, to get sufficient calcium.  I must be very careful because some calcium supplements are made from ground up crustacean shells.  When I was deficient in Vitamin D, I took high doses of Vitamin D to correct the deficiency quickly.  This is safe and nontoxic.  Vitamin D level should be above 70 nmol/L.  Lifeguards and indigenous Pacific Islanders typically have levels between 80-100 nmol/L.   Levels lower than this are based on amount needed to prevent disease like rickets and osteomalacia. We need more thiamine when we're physically ill, emotionally and mentally stressed, and if we exercise like an athlete or laborer.  We need more thiamine if we eat a diet high in simple carbohydrates.  For every 500 kcal of carbohydrates, we need 500-1000 mg more of thiamine to process the carbs into energy.  If there's insufficient thiamine the carbs get stored as fat.  Again, recommended levels set for thiamine are based on minimum amounts needed to prevent disease.  This is often not adequate for optimum health, nor sufficient for people with absorption problems such as Celiac disease.  Gluten free processed foods are not enriched with vitamins like their gluten containing counterparts.  Adding a B Complex and additional thiamine improves health for Celiacs.  Thiamine is safe and nontoxic even in high doses.  Thiamine helps the mitochondria in cells to function.  Thiamine interacts with each of the other B vitamins.  They are all water soluble and easily excreted if not needed. Interesting Reading: Clinical trial: B vitamins improve health in patients with coeliac disease living on a gluten-free diet https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19154566/ Safety and effectiveness of vitamin D mega-dose: A systematic review https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34857184/ High dose dietary vitamin D allocates surplus calories to muscle and growth instead of fat via modulation of myostatin and leptin signaling https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38766160/ Safety of High-Dose Vitamin D Supplementation: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31746327/ Vitamins and Celiac Disease: Beyond Vitamin D https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11857425/ Investigating the therapeutic potential of tryptophan and vitamin A in modulating immune responses in celiac disease: an experimental study https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40178602/ Investigating the Impact of Vitamin A and Amino Acids on Immune Responses in Celiac Disease Patients https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10814138/
    • Jane02
      Thank you so much @knitty kitty for this insightful information! I would have never considered fractionated coconut oil to be a potential source of GI upset. I will consider all the info you shared. Very interesting about the Thiamine deficiency.  I've tracked daily averages of my intake in a nutrition software. The only nutrient I can't consistently meet from my diet is vitamin D. Calcium is a hit and miss as I rely on vegetables, dark leafy greens as a major source, for my calcium intake. I'm able to meet it when I either eat or juice a bundle of kale or collard greens daily haha. My thiamine intake is roughly 120% of my needs, although I do recognize that I may not be absorbing all of these nutrients consistently with intermittent unintentional exposures to gluten.  My vitamin A intake is roughly 900% (~6400 mcg/d) of my needs as I eat a lot of sweet potato, although since it's plant-derived vitamin A (beta-carotene) apparently it's not likely to cause toxicity.  Thanks again! 
    • knitty kitty
      Hello, @Jane02,  I take Naturewise D 3.  It contains olive oil.   Some Vitamin D supplements, like D Drops, are made with fractionated coconut oil which can cause digestive upsets.  Fractionated coconut oil is not the same as coconut oil used for cooking.  Fractionated coconut oil has been treated for longer shelf life, so it won't go bad in the jar, and thus may be irritating to the digestive system. I avoid supplements made with soy because many people with Celiac Disease also react to soy.  Mixed tocopherols, an ingredient in Thornes Vitamin D, may be sourced from soy oil.  Kirkland's has soy on its ingredient list. I avoid things that might contain or be exposed to crustaceans, like Metagenics says on its label.  I have a crustacean/shellfish/fish allergy.  I like Life Extension Bioactive Complete B Complex.  I take additional Thiamine B 1 in the form Benfotiamine which helps the intestines heal, Life Extension MegaBenfotiamine. Thiamine is needed to activate Vitamin D.   Low thiamine can make one feel like they are getting glutened after a meal containing lots of simple carbohydrates like white rice, or processed gluten free foods like cookies and pasta.   It's rare to have a single vitamin deficiency.  The water soluble B Complex vitamins should be supplemented together with additional Thiamine in the form Benfotiamine and Thiamine TTFD (tetrahydrofurfuryl disulfide) to correct subclinical deficiencies that don't show up on blood tests.  These are subclinical deficiencies within organs and tissues.  Blood is a transportation system.  The body will deplete tissues and organs in order to keep a supply of thiamine in the bloodstream going to the brain and heart.   If you're low in Vitamin D, you may well be low in other fat soluble vitamins like Vitamin A and Vitamin K. Have you seen a dietician?
    • Scott Adams
      I do not know this, but since they are labelled gluten-free, and are not really a product that could easily be contaminated when making them (there would be not flour in the air of such a facility, for example), I don't really see contamination as something to be concerned about for this type of product. 
    • trents
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.