Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

First Visit To The Gi Doc...


Myrna

Recommended Posts

Myrna Newbie

I visited the GI doc for the first time today. I have to say I'm a little confused.

To begin I have blood tested negative to Celiac. Also, my blood looks good, no anemia, thyroid problems, etc.

My regular doctor said that blood test can be inaccurate and has a patient that test neg blood, pos biopsy. So she referred me to a GI doc to continue to check out Celiac or whatever else is giving me chronic D, gas, bloating, burning stomach etc. She said too that the fact that I hadn't been eating well before the test might have caused it to be negative.

So I saw the GI doc and he says I have GERD and is going to get me a colonoscopy and check for colitis and giardiasis. And if that all checks out okay then possibly say I have IBS. He said my blood test says negative so I definitely DON'T have Celiac. I guess my reg doc did a good full panel test for Celiac, so he said it's 99% accurate. He said the old test might be inaccurate, but not the new.

I'm just confused about the discrepancy between the 2 docs. I tried to tell him what my reg doc said, but he just cut me off and said I couldn't possibly have Celiac. He did say I might be carbohydrate intolerant. I've never heard of it before. He said it was probably the reason for the bloating & gas. He said it was a problem digesting bread, pasta, and rice, then I said I don't have a problem eating rice. Then he sort of retracted and said it was mainly just wheat in pasta and bread.

I'm confused about the accuracy of the blood test, is the GI doc right or my Reg doc? Is the "new" test really that accurate?

Does anyone know about carbohydrate intolerance? Is there a test for this (the GI doc didn't mention it, I didn't think to ask)?

Also, this is a little aside, but the GI doc didn't know what my appendix scar was. And when I told him, he seemed confused and said the appendix was on the other side (but the surgeon needed to make 3 incisions, one of them being on the "wrong" side) I guess it just made me doubt this doc's knowledge a bit- shouldn't a GI doc know the basics about how an appendix is taken out?

Sorry if this is long. Doctors and this whole medical stuff is very confusing, and I'm very new to all this. Thanks in advance!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Katsby Apprentice
I visited the GI doc for the first time today. I have to say I'm a little confused.

To begin I have blood tested negative to Celiac. Also, my blood looks good, no anemia, thyroid problems, etc.

My regular doctor said that blood test can be inaccurate and has a patient that test neg blood, pos biopsy. So she referred me to a GI doc to continue to check out Celiac or whatever else is giving me chronic D, gas, bloating, burning stomach etc. She said too that the fact that I hadn't been eating well before the test might have caused it to be negative.

So I saw the GI doc and he says I have GERD and is going to get me a colonoscopy and check for colitis and giardiasis. And if that all checks out okay then possibly say I have IBS. He said my blood test says negative so I definitely DON'T have Celiac. I guess my reg doc did a good full panel test for Celiac, so he said it's 99% accurate. He said the old test might be inaccurate, but not the new.

I'm just confused about the discrepancy between the 2 docs. I tried to tell him what my reg doc said, but he just cut me off and said I couldn't possibly have Celiac. He did say I might be carbohydrate intolerant. I've never heard of it before. He said it was probably the reason for the bloating & gas. He said it was a problem digesting bread, pasta, and rice, then I said I don't have a problem eating rice. Then he sort of retracted and said it was mainly just wheat in pasta and bread.

I'm confused about the accuracy of the blood test, is the GI doc right or my Reg doc? Is the "new" test really that accurate?

Does anyone know about carbohydrate intolerance? Is there a test for this (the GI doc didn't mention it, I didn't think to ask)?

Also, this is a little aside, but the GI doc didn't know what my appendix scar was. And when I told him, he seemed confused and said the appendix was on the other side (but the surgeon needed to make 3 incisions, one of them being on the "wrong" side) I guess it just made me doubt this doc's knowledge a bit- shouldn't a GI doc know the basics about how an appendix is taken out?

Sorry if this is long. Doctors and this whole medical stuff is very confusing, and I'm very new to all this. Thanks in advance!

If I were you I'd probably try to see a different GI. My Dr. told me that 30% of patients with bloodtest tested negative though they still had celiac disease.

lizard00 Enthusiast

Do you have your blood tests? I was also negative...the tests re pretty inaccurate for a number of reasons. If you had your results, you could post them here.

I agree, I would maybe try to find another doctor. The first one I went to was not so good. So, I was referred to another one and he is wonderful. Definitely worth a look.

Ursa Major Collaborator

Those blood tests are very accurate in a way. If they are positive, they are just that, positive. There are virtually no false positives (that is were the 99% accuracy comes from). But there are TONS of false negatives! A negative blood test for celiac disease can NEVER rule out celiac disease, just as a negative biopsy can't rule it out, because those biopsies are hit and miss, and it is easy to miss the damaged spots in the intestine.

That GI is a moron. Find a new one. If he still 'diagnoses' people with IBS, that confirms that he doesn't know what he is talking about. IBS is a bunch of symptoms which have a CAUSE. If your bowel is irritated, something is obviously irritating it. You need to find out what it is, so you can eliminate it and get well.

Beth in NC Contributor
Do you have your blood tests? I was also negative...the tests re pretty inaccurate for a number of reasons. If you had your results, you could post them here.

I agree, I would maybe try to find another doctor. The first one I went to was not so good. So, I was referred to another one and he is wonderful. Definitely worth a look.

Hey, Liz! Can you pm me the name of your doc you like so much. I live right around the corner from where you said he/she was and I'm kinda anticipating a change.

I would have thought mine would have warned about the lactose intolerance...but he didn't. I mean..they ARE the same villi. I just want a doc who is up on things.

Myrna Newbie

Thanks! That was my understanding that false negatives are common. It seems he wants to diagnose me with a variety of diseases (GERD, IBS, Carb Intolerance) that all seem to be tied to celiac, but not say it's celiac because of one blood test. I know I don't have a degree in medicine and I don't know if I do have celiac or a food intolerance, but a lot of the gi symptoms really fit celiac sprue.

Oh, also I forgot to mention, I thought it was odd he said celiac sprue is an allergy. From everything I've read so far says its not an allergy, but an autoimmune disease. I thought that was a whole other thing, right?

It's all so frustrating. I'm almost positive my problems are dietary in some way, at the very least, related to wheat. I would like to just start on the diet and feel better (like my 5day non-gluten test run), but I really want a diagnoses. I guess I'm tired of feeling sick and waiting for doctor appointments and tests! It's taken 7 weeks just to see this guy and another 11 days to get the colonoscopy. (sorry a little venting here!)

I think I'll be calling my regular doc tomorrow to ask a few questions and see what she has to say too.

ravenwoodglass Mentor
Thanks! That was my understanding that false negatives are common. It seems he wants to diagnose me with a variety of diseases (GERD, IBS, Carb Intolerance) that all seem to be tied to celiac, but not say it's celiac because of one blood test. I know I don't have a degree in medicine and I don't know if I do have celiac or a food intolerance, but a lot of the gi symptoms really fit celiac sprue.

Oh, also I forgot to mention, I thought it was odd he said celiac sprue is an allergy. From everything I've read so far says its not an allergy, but an autoimmune disease. I thought that was a whole other thing, right?

It's all so frustrating. I'm almost positive my problems are dietary in some way, at the very least, related to wheat. I would like to just start on the diet and feel better (like my 5day non-gluten test run), but I really want a diagnoses. I guess I'm tired of feeling sick and waiting for doctor appointments and tests! It's taken 7 weeks just to see this guy and another 11 days to get the colonoscopy. (sorry a little venting here!)

I think I'll be calling my regular doc tomorrow to ask a few questions and see what she has to say too.

You REALLY need to find another GI. He is not even considering celiac, if he was he would do a endo along with the colonoscopy. This one is clueless and IMHO all you are going to get from him are big bills and lots of scripts.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



ShayFL Enthusiast

I wouldnt let that GI doctor stick anything up/down ANY of my orafices. :o

You should look for a new one. Im wondering if he was young and right out of med school.......Or VERY OLD and "set in his ways".

I tested NEG on blood but POS to the diet.

Myrna Newbie

I called my regular doctor today and got another referral. I tried asking for a doc with more experience with Celiac, but she said there wasn't one in the area. Hopefully the next one will at least consider an endoscopy.

I did see a nutritionist today for my hypoglycemia, but mentioned my symptoms and what the GI doc had said. She said it sounded a lot like celiac and couldn't believe he wouldn't do the biopsy. She, of course, also said to get another doc.

ShayFL: LOL! He was about 45 years old. Funny you say that! When I first saw him, my first impression was he looks like he should be up on the whole celiac thing. He doesn't look that old or old school. That was before he spoke. :)

Thanks all again for the advice, it's reassuring hearing it.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      130,958
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Nancy Denhart
    Newest Member
    Nancy Denhart
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):




  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Waterdance
      Thanks. I believe I can trace my gluten and milk allergies to specific traumas in my life. I've had some quite severe traumas over my lifetime. Mostly in my history I was so out of sorts surviving that diagnosing gluten sensitivity/allergy/celiac was just not on the table for such a survival mode existence. Vitamin D makes sense too. Now I take very good care of myself, I have a rock solid stability and I do take 1,500 IU of D daily. It's more obvious to me now what's causing problems and so most of the time I only eat protein and vegetables. I cheat sometimes. I end up paying for it though. 
    • Heatherisle
      Thanks everyone for replying. Actually made a mistake when stating the lab range for results, should have been 0.0-7.0 not 0.7 u/ml. She was 19 u/ml. I’m afraid science bamboozles me especially trying to understand all the IgA’s and other bits!!!!Regular blood results like full blood count etc not so much!!!!
    • John767
      DiGiornos gluten free pizza at one point was  made from a dough derived of wheat starch...yet they were able to call it gluten free probably because it came in at under 20ppm for gluten.  Apparently the recipe was changed and the pizza not longer contains a wheat starch derived crust.  As for the Heinz dressing, it could be an issue with cross contamination with wheat barley and or rye somewhere during the production process.  If you read how Frito-Lays (on their website) designates items gluten free, you will understand the variances in the lengths companies go through in deciding when to put on a gluten free label and when not--Frito-Lays is pretty solid.  Also being in Canada, they may follow a common international rule of less than 20ppm of gluten is all that is required to be labeled gluten free regardless of the grains used to manufacture the product (common in Europe, Central, and South America)...it took a couple of really rough mornings after consuming some Dura Damm (labeled as gluten free outside the USA) for me to realize that it was a gluten reduced beer. Same with Mahou Beer which actually says in Spanish "suitable for celiacs", unfortunately it is not suitable for this celiac and of course the following day was really rough as well...really take the time to read the ingredients because had I read the ingredients of  Mahou's "suitable for celiacs" "sin gluten" beer I would have noticed that it was made from cabada (Spanish for barley)...hope this helps...        
    • Wheatwacked
      Here is an article that explains test results and what they mean.  Testing for Celiac Disease is so elusive, any positive, unless a lab error false positive, is evident of Celiac.  It is easier to be in denial, tnan committing to gluten free.  Like not believing a pregnancy test.  Denial will lead to more suffering. Are You Confused About Your Celiac Disease Lab Results?
    • Wheatwacked
      I believe that what triggers acute Celiac Disease is vitamin D deficiency.  When we have stress it depletes our already low vitamin D, (40% to 60% of us in the industrial world are deficient) allowing the Celiac genes and the immune system to run amuck.  At 93 ng/ml 25(OH)D blood level, the last time I accidentally glutened myself, all that I got was a runny nose and burning eyes three days later.  It took 8 years, taking 10,000 IU a day to get to this blood level. Vitamin D Is Not as Toxic as Was Once Thought Possible Role of Vitamin D in Celiac Disease Onset So true.  If I am working on something I'm enjoying, I put off eating because after I eat I mostly feel worse.  Not so much anymore, but it's been a life long struggle with the anorexia.  M&M Peanuts is a good go-to snack.  For the dairy Kosher Dill pickles, brine fermented, not vinegar quick pickles (vinegar kills the bacteria), will repopulate your gut with Lactobacillus that exretes lactase, the reason adults are not lactose intolerant.  Also, grassfed milk has less omega 6 fatty acids than commercial grain fed dairy. Grassfed omega 6:3 ratio is 1:1; Organic milk 3:1; Commercial Dairy 5:1.  Omega 6 causes inflammation.  The typical western diet is 14:1.  Wheat flour is 22:1.  A good reason not to eat gluten.  Here is a list: High omega-3/low omega-6 I find it interesting that the new diagnosis of Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity was created 10 years after Norman Borlaug, "the father of the Green Revolution" and our modern grain crops, received the Nobel Peace Prize in 1970.  
×
×
  • Create New...