Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

First Visit To The Gi Doc...


Myrna

Recommended Posts

Myrna Newbie

I visited the GI doc for the first time today. I have to say I'm a little confused.

To begin I have blood tested negative to Celiac. Also, my blood looks good, no anemia, thyroid problems, etc.

My regular doctor said that blood test can be inaccurate and has a patient that test neg blood, pos biopsy. So she referred me to a GI doc to continue to check out Celiac or whatever else is giving me chronic D, gas, bloating, burning stomach etc. She said too that the fact that I hadn't been eating well before the test might have caused it to be negative.

So I saw the GI doc and he says I have GERD and is going to get me a colonoscopy and check for colitis and giardiasis. And if that all checks out okay then possibly say I have IBS. He said my blood test says negative so I definitely DON'T have Celiac. I guess my reg doc did a good full panel test for Celiac, so he said it's 99% accurate. He said the old test might be inaccurate, but not the new.

I'm just confused about the discrepancy between the 2 docs. I tried to tell him what my reg doc said, but he just cut me off and said I couldn't possibly have Celiac. He did say I might be carbohydrate intolerant. I've never heard of it before. He said it was probably the reason for the bloating & gas. He said it was a problem digesting bread, pasta, and rice, then I said I don't have a problem eating rice. Then he sort of retracted and said it was mainly just wheat in pasta and bread.

I'm confused about the accuracy of the blood test, is the GI doc right or my Reg doc? Is the "new" test really that accurate?

Does anyone know about carbohydrate intolerance? Is there a test for this (the GI doc didn't mention it, I didn't think to ask)?

Also, this is a little aside, but the GI doc didn't know what my appendix scar was. And when I told him, he seemed confused and said the appendix was on the other side (but the surgeon needed to make 3 incisions, one of them being on the "wrong" side) I guess it just made me doubt this doc's knowledge a bit- shouldn't a GI doc know the basics about how an appendix is taken out?

Sorry if this is long. Doctors and this whole medical stuff is very confusing, and I'm very new to all this. Thanks in advance!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Katsby Apprentice
I visited the GI doc for the first time today. I have to say I'm a little confused.

To begin I have blood tested negative to Celiac. Also, my blood looks good, no anemia, thyroid problems, etc.

My regular doctor said that blood test can be inaccurate and has a patient that test neg blood, pos biopsy. So she referred me to a GI doc to continue to check out Celiac or whatever else is giving me chronic D, gas, bloating, burning stomach etc. She said too that the fact that I hadn't been eating well before the test might have caused it to be negative.

So I saw the GI doc and he says I have GERD and is going to get me a colonoscopy and check for colitis and giardiasis. And if that all checks out okay then possibly say I have IBS. He said my blood test says negative so I definitely DON'T have Celiac. I guess my reg doc did a good full panel test for Celiac, so he said it's 99% accurate. He said the old test might be inaccurate, but not the new.

I'm just confused about the discrepancy between the 2 docs. I tried to tell him what my reg doc said, but he just cut me off and said I couldn't possibly have Celiac. He did say I might be carbohydrate intolerant. I've never heard of it before. He said it was probably the reason for the bloating & gas. He said it was a problem digesting bread, pasta, and rice, then I said I don't have a problem eating rice. Then he sort of retracted and said it was mainly just wheat in pasta and bread.

I'm confused about the accuracy of the blood test, is the GI doc right or my Reg doc? Is the "new" test really that accurate?

Does anyone know about carbohydrate intolerance? Is there a test for this (the GI doc didn't mention it, I didn't think to ask)?

Also, this is a little aside, but the GI doc didn't know what my appendix scar was. And when I told him, he seemed confused and said the appendix was on the other side (but the surgeon needed to make 3 incisions, one of them being on the "wrong" side) I guess it just made me doubt this doc's knowledge a bit- shouldn't a GI doc know the basics about how an appendix is taken out?

Sorry if this is long. Doctors and this whole medical stuff is very confusing, and I'm very new to all this. Thanks in advance!

If I were you I'd probably try to see a different GI. My Dr. told me that 30% of patients with bloodtest tested negative though they still had celiac disease.

lizard00 Enthusiast

Do you have your blood tests? I was also negative...the tests re pretty inaccurate for a number of reasons. If you had your results, you could post them here.

I agree, I would maybe try to find another doctor. The first one I went to was not so good. So, I was referred to another one and he is wonderful. Definitely worth a look.

Ursa Major Collaborator

Those blood tests are very accurate in a way. If they are positive, they are just that, positive. There are virtually no false positives (that is were the 99% accuracy comes from). But there are TONS of false negatives! A negative blood test for celiac disease can NEVER rule out celiac disease, just as a negative biopsy can't rule it out, because those biopsies are hit and miss, and it is easy to miss the damaged spots in the intestine.

That GI is a moron. Find a new one. If he still 'diagnoses' people with IBS, that confirms that he doesn't know what he is talking about. IBS is a bunch of symptoms which have a CAUSE. If your bowel is irritated, something is obviously irritating it. You need to find out what it is, so you can eliminate it and get well.

Beth in NC Contributor
Do you have your blood tests? I was also negative...the tests re pretty inaccurate for a number of reasons. If you had your results, you could post them here.

I agree, I would maybe try to find another doctor. The first one I went to was not so good. So, I was referred to another one and he is wonderful. Definitely worth a look.

Hey, Liz! Can you pm me the name of your doc you like so much. I live right around the corner from where you said he/she was and I'm kinda anticipating a change.

I would have thought mine would have warned about the lactose intolerance...but he didn't. I mean..they ARE the same villi. I just want a doc who is up on things.

Myrna Newbie

Thanks! That was my understanding that false negatives are common. It seems he wants to diagnose me with a variety of diseases (GERD, IBS, Carb Intolerance) that all seem to be tied to celiac, but not say it's celiac because of one blood test. I know I don't have a degree in medicine and I don't know if I do have celiac or a food intolerance, but a lot of the gi symptoms really fit celiac sprue.

Oh, also I forgot to mention, I thought it was odd he said celiac sprue is an allergy. From everything I've read so far says its not an allergy, but an autoimmune disease. I thought that was a whole other thing, right?

It's all so frustrating. I'm almost positive my problems are dietary in some way, at the very least, related to wheat. I would like to just start on the diet and feel better (like my 5day non-gluten test run), but I really want a diagnoses. I guess I'm tired of feeling sick and waiting for doctor appointments and tests! It's taken 7 weeks just to see this guy and another 11 days to get the colonoscopy. (sorry a little venting here!)

I think I'll be calling my regular doc tomorrow to ask a few questions and see what she has to say too.

ravenwoodglass Mentor
Thanks! That was my understanding that false negatives are common. It seems he wants to diagnose me with a variety of diseases (GERD, IBS, Carb Intolerance) that all seem to be tied to celiac, but not say it's celiac because of one blood test. I know I don't have a degree in medicine and I don't know if I do have celiac or a food intolerance, but a lot of the gi symptoms really fit celiac sprue.

Oh, also I forgot to mention, I thought it was odd he said celiac sprue is an allergy. From everything I've read so far says its not an allergy, but an autoimmune disease. I thought that was a whole other thing, right?

It's all so frustrating. I'm almost positive my problems are dietary in some way, at the very least, related to wheat. I would like to just start on the diet and feel better (like my 5day non-gluten test run), but I really want a diagnoses. I guess I'm tired of feeling sick and waiting for doctor appointments and tests! It's taken 7 weeks just to see this guy and another 11 days to get the colonoscopy. (sorry a little venting here!)

I think I'll be calling my regular doc tomorrow to ask a few questions and see what she has to say too.

You REALLY need to find another GI. He is not even considering celiac, if he was he would do a endo along with the colonoscopy. This one is clueless and IMHO all you are going to get from him are big bills and lots of scripts.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



ShayFL Enthusiast

I wouldnt let that GI doctor stick anything up/down ANY of my orafices. :o

You should look for a new one. Im wondering if he was young and right out of med school.......Or VERY OLD and "set in his ways".

I tested NEG on blood but POS to the diet.

Myrna Newbie

I called my regular doctor today and got another referral. I tried asking for a doc with more experience with Celiac, but she said there wasn't one in the area. Hopefully the next one will at least consider an endoscopy.

I did see a nutritionist today for my hypoglycemia, but mentioned my symptoms and what the GI doc had said. She said it sounded a lot like celiac and couldn't believe he wouldn't do the biopsy. She, of course, also said to get another doc.

ShayFL: LOL! He was about 45 years old. Funny you say that! When I first saw him, my first impression was he looks like he should be up on the whole celiac thing. He doesn't look that old or old school. That was before he spoke. :)

Thanks all again for the advice, it's reassuring hearing it.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,676
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    AW1851
    Newest Member
    AW1851
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Rejoicephd
      That and my nutritionist also said that drinking cider is one of the worst drink choices for me, given that I have candida overgrowth.  She said the combination of the alcohol and sugar would be very likely to worsen my candida problem.  She suggested that if I drink, I go for clear vodka, either neat or with a splash of cranberry.   So in summary, I am giving ciders a rest.  Whether it's a gluten risk or sugars and yeast overgrowth, its just not worth it.
    • Inkie
      Thank you for the information ill will definitely bring it into practice .
    • Scott Adams
      While plain, pure tea leaves (black, green, or white) are naturally gluten-free, the issue often lies not with the tea itself but with other ingredients or processing. Many flavored teas use barley malt or other gluten-containing grains as a flavoring agent, which would be clearly listed on the ingredient label. Cross-contamination is another possibility, either in the facility where the tea is processed or, surprisingly, from the tea bag material itself—some tea bags are sealed with a wheat-based glue. Furthermore, it's important to consider that your reaction could be to other substances in tea, such as high levels of tannins, which can be hard on the stomach, or to natural histamines or other compounds that can cause a non-celiac immune response. The best way to investigate is to carefully read labels for hidden ingredients, try switching to a certified gluten-free tea brand that uses whole leaf or pyramid-style bags, and see if the reaction persists.
    • Scott Adams
      This is a challenging and confusing situation. The combination of a positive EMA—which is a highly specific marker rarely yielding false positives—alongside strongly elevated TTG on two separate occasions, years apart, is profoundly suggestive of celiac disease, even in the absence of biopsy damage. This pattern strongly aligns with what is known as "potential celiac disease," where the immune system is clearly activated, but intestinal damage has not yet become visible under the microscope. Your concern about the long-term risk of continued gluten consumption is valid, especially given your family's experience with the consequences of delayed diagnosis. Since your daughter is now at an age where her buy-in is essential for a gluten-free lifestyle, obtaining a definitive answer is crucial for her long-term adherence and health. Given that she is asymptomatic yet serologically positive, a third biopsy now, after a proper 12-week challenge, offers the best chance to capture any microscopic damage that may have developed, providing the concrete evidence needed to justify the dietary change. This isn't about wanting her to have celiac; it's about wanting to prevent the insidious damage that can occur while waiting for symptoms to appear, and ultimately giving her the unambiguous "why" she needs to accept and commit to the necessary treatment. This article might be helpful. It breaks down each type of test, and what a positive results means in terms of the probability that you might have celiac disease. One test that always needs to be done is the IgA Levels/Deficiency Test (often called "Total IGA") because some people are naturally IGA deficient, and if this is the case, then certain blood tests for celiac disease might be false-negative, and other types of tests need to be done to make an accurate diagnosis. The article includes the "Mayo Clinic Protocol," which is the best overall protocol for results to be ~98% accurate.    
    • Scott Adams
      Welcome to the community! Generally, for a gluten challenge before celiac disease blood tests, Tylenol (acetaminophen) is considered safe and should not interfere with your antibody results. The medications you typically need to avoid are those like ibuprofen (Advil, Motrin) or naproxen (Aleve) that can cause intestinal irritation, which could potentially complicate the interpretation of an endoscopy if you were to have one. However, it is absolutely crucial that you confirm this with either your gastroenterologist or your surgeon before your procedure. They know the specifics of your case and can give you the definitive green light, ensuring your surgery is comfortable and your celiac testing remains accurate. Best of luck with your surgery tomorrow
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.