Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Agave Netar


Jo Ann

Recommended Posts

ShayFL Enthusiast

Great thread! Like I said...use sparingly. For special treats now and again.

Even breathing damages the body. But we cannot do that sparingly. ;)

We have a choice with what we put into our bodies. Just use common sense. Is it natural? Could I find it in this form in nature? If not, dont eat too much of it (or not at all).


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



VioletBlue Contributor

If I remember right, Stevia is not classified in the U.S. as a sweetner. That's one of the reasons you won't find it in the grocery store aisle with sugar. I believe it's classifed and regulated as an food supplement. There was indeed a time when it's import was banned by the FDA.

Fortunately or unfortunately several companies in the U.S. are in the process of trying create a patented zero calorie sweetner derived from Stevia. This would include Coca Cola. Sucks for me because if they're succesful that crap will be in everything soon and I'll have to avoid everything. They call it progress. I have other names for it :angry:

Unfortunately there's a lot of ignorance about the dangers of fructose out there. Some of this info is pretty new so it isn't going to filter down to doctors for another 10 years or so.

I have done a lot of research on the topic of sweeteners over the last 5 years. Unfortunately there's a lot of really bad information whose source is the sugar industry. They've done a lot of whisper campaigns over the years to discredit non-caloric sweeteners with things that are just out-and-out untrue. I wish I could remember the name of the sweetener they killed with a PR campaign, it's making a comeback now. I think it's Stevia, now some big agri companies are getting involved in marketing it so I'm sure we'll be hearing more whispering about it causing cancer or some such.

I've compiled a lot of info from several months into Open Original Shared Link about fructose.

RiceGuy Collaborator
Keep in mind with Stevia that is is derived from a plant very closely related to ragweed. Anyone with a ragweed allergy should not use Stevia. Also be carefull when you first start to use Stevia and watch for an allergic reaction. Trust me, the reaction is a doozy.

Well, I'm sure there are some whom can't have Stevia, but not everyone with a ragweed allergy will react to Stevia. In fact, I've read that most do not react to it at all. Also, the purity of the product is very important. Do NOT buy the green one. And most brands aren't as pure as they could be, which means that the amount of impurities could be enough to cause a reaction for some. Those impurities are also responsible for most or all of the aftertaste which some people report.

I use the pure powder, no added anything. It is made in Brazil, not China as most are. The purity is the highest on the market, at over 95%, compared to around 80% for others.

I have no doubt that some react, but it isn't true to say everyone with an allergy to ragweed would react to Stevia.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,212
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Pamela c
    Newest Member
    Pamela c
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Fayeb23
      Thank you that’s really helpful, hopeful won’t have to have a biopsy.
    • RMJ
      That means the normal range (i.e. not celiac disease) would be a result less than 14.99.  Your result is WAY above that. Some gastroenterologists would diagnose that as celiac disease even without a confirming biopsy because it is more than ten times the top of the normal range.
    • Redanafs
      Hi everyone. Back in 2022 I had blood work drawn for iga ext gliadin. Since then I’ve developed worse stomach issues and all other health issues. My doctor just said cut out gluten. He did no further testing. Please see my test results attached. I just need some direction cause I feel so ill and the stomach pain is becoming worse. Can this test show indications for other gastrointestinal diseases?
    • Fayeb23
      Thank you. These were the results TTG ABS NUMERICAL: > 250.0 U/mL [< 14.99]  Really don’t understand the results!
    • Scott Adams
      Clearly from what you've said the info on Dailymed is much more up to date than the other site, which hasn't been updated since 2017. The fact that some companies might be repackaging drugs does not mean the info on the ingredients is not correct.
×
×
  • Create New...