Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):
  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

How Long For Elevated Blood Levels Again?


PaigesMom

Recommended Posts

PaigesMom Newbie

Does anyone know how long it would take for positive bloodwork to appear again AFTER going OFF OF a gluten-free diet? My daughter had + bloodwork, a questionable biopsy, and went gluten-free for 5 months - went off of the diet in November and had more bloodwork done in the beginning of February - TOTALLY NORMAL results, well within the normal range. The dr.s are saying she might not have been off of the diet long enough? I thought that bloodwork would come back positive fairly quickly, am I wrong on that? Thank you.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



lovegrov Collaborator

Rule of thumb is that three months would be long enough, but everybody reacts differently. Nobody can say how long it takes any given person to be positive again.

Why is she doing this. Did some sort of symptoms improvew while she was gluten-free? If so and if she had positive blood tests before and if the biopsy was even borderline (many celiac disease experts now consider the "questionable" biopsy a positive when combined with positive bloodwork), you're talking pretty much 100 percent she has celiac disease.

richard

PaigesMom Newbie

My daughter is only 4, and she has Down syndrome. It is extremely difficult to explain to her why she has to eat certain types of food, and it came down to the point where she was not eating at all and she was losing weight. We stumbled upon this in the Down syndrome heath protocols - they recommended a screening at age 4 and that's what came back positive. She had no other 'symptoms' - the pediatrician did bloodwork and her IGg/Ttg came back at a 98, they did the biopsy and the biopsy was negative. They told me to keep her on the diet but again, she was becoming sick, so they told me to take her off of it, considering the negative biopsy and they would do more bloodwork. They did the Celiac Genetic Test which showed the genetic marker (however 30% of the general population also has it - it's just a marker) and this time her Ttg/IGg came back as a 10!! They were going to rebiopsy her IF the bloodwork came back positive, but with a negative first biopsy and negative second bloodwork, no symptoms, picked up by chance on a regular health screening, they are now saying that the first set of bloodwork was wrong. I have read over and over again here how bloodwork is not reliable.

I'm not sure what to believe, if she has it or not.

whimsygirl Newbie

You know, I was coming into the message board just to ask this question. I have put the gluten back into my diet for 18 days and I'm feeling SOOOO sick from it. My Dr. admits to not knowing much about this and is learning as we go. She doesn't think the blood test should be done till maybe 4-6 weeks after adding the gluten back in, but don't you think that if it's making me feel so sick that it would show up in the blood tests. I'm getting discouraged and about ready to give up and skip the tests altogether and go gluten-free without the diagnosis!! :blink:

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - nanny marley replied to wellthatsfun's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      4

      nothing has changed

    2. - trents replied to Scott Adams's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      46

      Supplements for those Diagnosed with Celiac Disease

    3. - trents replied to Woodster991's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      10

      Is it gluten?

    4. - RMJ replied to wellthatsfun's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      4

      nothing has changed

    5. - asaT replied to wellthatsfun's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      4

      nothing has changed

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,342
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Muhammad
    Newest Member
    Muhammad
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.6k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • nanny marley
      I agree there I've tryed this myself to prove I can't eat gluten or lactose and it sets me back for about a month till I have to go back to being very strict to settle again 
    • trents
      You may also need to supplement with B12 as this vitamin is also involved in iron assimilation and is often deficient in long-term undiagnosed celiac disease.
    • trents
      @par18, no, Scott's use of the term "false negative" is intentional and appropriate. The "total IGA" test is not a test used to diagnose celiac disease per se. The IGA immune spectrum response encompasses more than just celiac disease. So, "total IGA" refers to the whole pie, not just the celiac response part of it. But if the whole pie is deficient, the spectrum of components making it up will likely be also, including the celiac disease response spectrum. In other words, IGA deficiency may produce a tTG-IGA score that is negative that might have been positive had there not been IGA deficiency. So, the tTG-IGA negative score may be "false", i.e, inaccurate, aka, not to be trusted.
    • RMJ
      This may be the problem. Every time you eat gluten it is like giving a booster shot to your immune system, telling it to react and produce antibodies again.
    • asaT
      Scott, I am mostly asymptomatic. I was diagnosed based on high antibodies, low ferritin (3) and low vitamin D (10). I wasn't able to get in for the biopsy until 3 months after the blood test came back. I was supposed to keep eating gluten during this time. Well why would I continue doing something that I know to be harmful for 3 more months to just get this test? So I did quit gluten and had the biopsy. It was negative for celiacs. I continued gluten free with iron supps and my ferritin came back up to a reasonable, but not great level of around 30-35.  Could there be something else going on? Is there any reason why my antibodies would be high (>80) with a negative biopsy? could me intestines have healed that quickly (3 months)?  I'm having a hard time staying gluten free because I am asymptomatic and i'm wondering about that biopsy. I do have the celiacs gene, and all of the antibody tests have always come back high. I recently had them tested again. Still very high. I am gluten free mostly, but not totally. I will occasionally eat something with gluten, but try to keep to a minimum. It's really hard when the immediate consequences are nil.  with high antibodies, the gene, but a negative biopsy (after 3 months strict gluten-free), do i really have celiacs? please say no. lol. i think i know the answer.  Asa
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.