Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Flour Mixes


rv girl

Recommended Posts

rv girl Newbie

Hi, I'm new to all of this, but my husband and I have been trying to find out what all these different flours and starches are supposed to do. Here's some questions:

Why do I have to use 2 different starches (i.e., tapioca and potato starch); why not just use one such as tapioca.

Can I substitute brown rice flour for white rice flour? Any consequences in doing so. I need all the fiber I can get.

I'm currently using Mary frances' all purpose flour mixture (3 parts brown rice flour, 3 parts cornstarch, 2 parts soy flour and 1 part corn flour). These ingredients seem to be in the local wal-marts and since I am a full time rver, Walmart is my store of choice as they are all across the U.S. But I'm finding so many other "flour mixtures". Can I just use this one mixture for everything.

Can I just substitute brown rice flour for whole wheat or white flour and just add some xanthan gum?

So, I'm back to my beginning question, what is the purpose of all these different flours/starches and why do we have to use so many different ones?

I've bought several different books and am more confused than ever.

Thanks for all the help.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



CeliacMom2008 Enthusiast

I'm a year into the gluten-free cooking and am just starting to get a handle on the flours, so I'm sure others will have much better answers but I'll give it a start...and please someone correct me if I lead her astray!

You need a mix to get a good taste and texture. No one flour will give you a result. Rice flours are a good base, but they don't give you enough fiber and protein to be all that healthy. They're better than the starches though (corn, tapioca, potato). To up the nutrition and fiber, a lot of people add bean flours. But alone a bean flour is going to give you way too strong of a flavor. Hence the need to mix.

Everyone seems to have their own favorite mixes. If you can get a copy of the latest issue of Living Without, it has a whole section on flours and mixes that I found very helpful. Check out their website as well because they frequently post their articles there as well.

Can you sub brown and white? I don't think so. I've been told white is pretty gritty, but can't attest to that myself. We use brown most of the time with white on occasion. And I use sweet rice flour with pie crusts. For whatever that's worth.

Can you just sub brown rice for wheat? Nope. I don't think you'd like the results of that one bit!

You mentioned Wal-mart, I also use amazon for a lot of staples (like brown rice flour that we go through quickly). It's pretty cheap, no tax, and free shipping if you sign up for subscription or have $25 or more in your order.

Good luck!!

RiceGuy Collaborator

To add to what has been said, you can add more fiber and nutrients with flours such as buckwheat, teff, amaranth, and others such as fava/garbanzo bean flours. Sorghum and millet flours make a good substitute for rice flours, without any apparent grittiness.

I've found that some items can be made with only one flour, but in most cases, a mixture does work better. I find that protein helps the browning of breads, so if your baked items look "ghostly", try adding a high protein flour. Soy seems to get baked goods to brown very easily, but it does result in a noticeably softer, more moist consistency. Therefore, in general, only a small amount is used, like 1/5 or less of the total amount.

I've made cookies with only buckwheat, and pie crust can work with one flour too, depending on your preferences. But when the dough needs to rise, a mix will probably always be better.

I recommend avoiding Bob's Red Mill, as their flours are rancid, due to the fact that they stone grind them. This is especially noticeable with their bean flours, which smell and taste awful. Bean flours don't taste or smell offensive when fresh, and made properly. That's not to say there isn't a smell, as they do have a more prominent smell than most other flours.

I like the aroma which amaranth adds to breads, but it also tends to add moistness. So too much of it can weigh down the dough, resulting in a somewhat dense, almost soggy lump.

Lastly, consider that I don't use any starches in my baking, so it may be possible that soy and amaranth can be used in higher proportions with a predominantly starchy blend. One way to find out is to try it.

When I first started experimenting with gluten-free baking, I made small lumps of dough - just enough for a biscuit or muffin. That way, there wouldn't be a lot of something awful to eat if it flopped. Cookies are usually pretty easy to make gluten-free, probably because they don't have to rise. That's a good place to start IMO.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Rogol72 replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      8

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    2. - Scott Adams replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      8

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    3. - Scott Adams replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    4. - deanna1ynne replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,441
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Linda Boxdorfer
    Newest Member
    Linda Boxdorfer
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Rogol72
      @HAUS, I was at an event in the UK a few years back. I remember ringing the restaurant ahead to inquire about the gluten free options. All I wanted was a few gluten free sandwiches, which they provided and they were delicious. The gluten-free bread they used was Warbutons white bread and I remember mentioning it on this site before. No harm in trying it once. It's fortified with Calcium and Iron. https://www.warburtonsglutenfree.com/warbs_products/white-loaf/ The only other gluten-free bread that I've come across that is fortified is Schar with Iodized salt, nothing else.
    • Scott Adams
      In the U.S., most regular wheat breads are required to be enriched with certain B-vitamins and iron, but gluten-free breads are not required to be. Since many gluten-free products are not enriched, we usually encourage people with celiac disease to consider a multivitamin.  In the early 1900s, refined white flour replaced whole grains, and people began developing serious vitamin-deficiency diseases: Beriberi → caused by a lack of thiamin (vitamin B1) Pellagra → caused by a lack of niacin (vitamin B3) Anemia → linked to low iron and lack of folate By the 1930s–40s, these problems were common in the U.S., especially in poorer regions. Public-health officials responded by requiring wheat flour and the breads made from it to be “enriched” with thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, and iron. Folic acid was added later (1998) to prevent neural-tube birth defects. Why gluten-free bread isn’t required to be enriched? The U.S. enrichment standards were written specifically for wheat flour. Gluten-free breads use rice, tapioca, corn, sorghum, etc.—so they fall outside that rule—but they probably should be for the same reason wheat products are.
    • Scott Adams
      Keep in mind that there are drawbacks to a formal diagnosis, for example more expensive life and private health insurance, as well as possibly needing to disclose it on job applications. Normally I am in favor of the formal diagnosis process, but if you've already figured out that you can't tolerate gluten and will likely stay gluten-free anyway, I wanted to at least mention the possible negative sides of having a formal diagnosis. While I understand wanting a formal diagnosis, it sounds like she will likely remain gluten-free either way, even if she should test negative for celiac disease (Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If her symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet, it would likely signal NCGS).        
    • JoJo0611
    • deanna1ynne
      Thank you all so much for your advice and thoughts. We ended up having another scope and more bloodwork last week. All serological markers continue to increase, and the doc who did the scope said there villous atrophy visible on the scope — but we just got the biopsy pathology report back, and all it says is, “Duodenal mucosa with patchy increased intraepithelial lymphocytes, preserved villous architecture, and patchy foveolar metaplasia,” which we are told is still inconclusive…  We will have her go gluten free again anyway, but how soon would you all test again, if at all? How valuable is an official dx in a situation like this?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.