Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Two Positive Blood Tests


Budapest

Recommended Posts

Budapest Newbie

Hi. We're new here. My son, who is four years old, was diagnosed with diabetes at 22 months. He has been tested yearly for celiac, and this time the results came back positive-- IgG level was 30, IgA was 119. The blood test was done a second time and was again positive.

We have been told that a biopsy is used to confirm the results. This would mean waiting another one or two months, between scheduling the surgery and waiting for the results. I'm wondering why the biopsy is so necessary-- what else could these blood results mean, besides celiac? Are children ever diagnosed without a biopsy?

It's frustrating to have to wait, though the doctors seem to think there's no need to rush. He does not seem to have obvious symptoms. He has seemed more tired and irritable lately, which his preschool teacher also noticed. Could this be related in some way?

In the meantime we are thinking a lot about how we would get started with the gluten- free diet.

Looking forward to hearing from you all... thanks.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



happygirl Collaborator

You may want to ask your doctor to run the more specific tests for Celiac - like the tTG IgA and the EMA IgA. I'm guessing that the tests you had done were the AGA IgA and the AGA IgG. No one test is perfect, but the tTG and/or EMA tests are more sensitive/specific than the AGA tests. After you get the results of those, you can then make a decision with more information. Your doctor probably can get you in sooner with a GI, especially if you stress your need for a quicker endoscopy with biopsy (not surgery!) Its a quick procedure with use of sedation, not general anesthesia. You can start the gluten free diet without the results - but you have to be gluten free until the testing is over. You don't have to wait to get the results to try the diet.

Diabetes is related to Celiac...you have a great doctor for monitoring your son or Celiac - many doctors do not.

Research has found that most Celiacs don't have what we think of as the "common" symptoms - GI related, usually. They think now that most Celiacs do not have the 'obvious' symptoms.

Welcome to the board! It is a great resource and you will learn a lot here.

kaiess Contributor

My son, 9, type 1 diabetic also, was tested last year and his TTG was 95 (normal under 20). He has no symptoms that we can see and his scope came back negative. They discovered duodenal ulcers and thought maybe that was causing the high TTG. Anyways, we treated the ulcers then the TTG was repeated and it came back 149!! This was 6 months after the first test. I was panicking yet they were not worried too much seeing he has type 1 (could skew the results), and the fact that his biopsy was negative just 3 months before and no symptoms. They decided to wait, run a TTG again and if the results are higher they will scope again. I was told if he's over 200 it is almost certain Celiac diagnosis. We have just had that TTG drawn and are awaiting results. In the mean time I'm trying to figure out how to live life gluten-free if it comes to that. I also know of another girl here in town with the exact same results as our son and also Type 1, no Celiac symptoms. Our ped endo says she knows of a few kids with type 1 and these false negatives. We are hoping for the best but preparing for the worst just in case. Good luck, I know it's hard being patient. Our ped gastro will not diagnose unless there is a positive biopsy. We're in BC, Canada.

Kathy, mom to Jakob, 9 dx Type 1 diabetes Mar2004, pumping MM 522 + CGMS

kaiess Contributor

Oh, also ask for the genetic marker tests. We had it done on our son and he has both markers. That does not mean he has or will have Celiac. What the test will tell you is you will NOT have Celiac if you don't carry any of the genetic markers.

Kathy

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      130,973
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Carolyn Yocum
    Newest Member
    Carolyn Yocum
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Waterdance
      It is addictive. The dopamine hit I get from a sandwich after being gluten free for a while is insane and I immediately crave more. Maybe if I think of it more like an addiction I'll be able to beat it in the future. 
    • Wheatwacked
      Undiagnosed Celiac Disease was your root cause.  As you heal and adress nutritional deficiencies you'll see lifetime symptoms disapear, some you don't even realize you have.     Until 1951 no one knew the cause.  Around 1900 it was also called "Infantilism", you outgrew it or died.  Dr Hass around 1920 was the first to come up with a treatment with close to 100% survival.  At 63 I followed his diet for a while and it helped me past the early stage of recovery.  Even then it was only considered a childhood disease, eventually the child outgrew it.  Once outgrown the child was reintroduced to wheat.  After that any symptoms that arose were attributed to whatever was popular, gall bladder, allergy, endometriosis, etc.  Often the final diagnosis is "we do not know the cause, it is just normal for some people, but we have medications that will treat your symptoms."   I was bloated, and always colicky.  When my son was born in 1976, my mother commented "You got what you gave."  I pointed out to my wife that he looked like a Biafra baby from the Biafra famine in 1970.  One of the first successful sales of modern wheat was to replace the rice the Biafran Aid Society supplied.  After searching the state where we lived (pop. 6 million) we found the one child gastroenterologist familiar with Celiac.  He only had 13 other children dianosed with the disease under his care and after several endoscopies my son was diagnosed, put on GFD and immediately thrived.  The doctor also suggested my wife and I also do gluten free.  We declined, not having any gastro problems.  That remains my only regret in my life. THE VALUE OF THE BANANA IN THE TREATMENT OF CELIAC DISEASE  Dr Hass' 1924 puplication with diet. There are over 300 symptoms related to celiac disease I believe that if you have the genes, you have Celiac Disease, but your immune system is strong enough to keep it subdued, or your symptoms are misdiagnosed as something not wheat.  Until something happens to weaken the immune system, and symptoms, often misdiagnosed and wrongly treated, until eventually you die, never knowing or you get lucky and end up eating gluten free.  To me it explains the late onset of acute symptoms, many are "just normal for you". Ever wonder why people get so angry if you suggest they may have Celiac Disease.  Wheat is a cultural and economic staple of our lives.  And it is addictive, it numbs our body.  Suddenly, gluten free, all the other irritants are no longer suppressed.  
    • trents
      I don't think we can say that just one thing, whether vitamin D deficiency or emotional trauma, or a viral infection, or what ever is always what triggers the onset of celiac disease. We do know there is a genetic component to it and there is increasing evidence that factors creating gut dysbiosis (such as overuse of antibiotics and preservatives and environmental toxins) are major players. Hybridizing of heirloom wheat strains to increase the gluten content by multiples may also be a factor.
    • trents
      Thanks for the follow-up correction. Yes, so not 10x normal and the biopsy is therefore totally appropriate to rule out a false positive or the unlikely but still possible situation of the elevated lab test number being caused by something besides celiac disease. 
    • Waterdance
      Thanks. I believe I can trace my gluten and milk allergies to specific traumas in my life. I've had some quite severe traumas over my lifetime. Mostly in my history I was so out of sorts surviving that diagnosing gluten sensitivity/allergy/celiac was just not on the table for such a survival mode existence. Vitamin D makes sense too. Now I take very good care of myself, I have a rock solid stability and I do take 1,500 IU of D daily. It's more obvious to me now what's causing problems and so most of the time I only eat protein and vegetables. I cheat sometimes. I end up paying for it though. 
×
×
  • Create New...