Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Upcoming Scope


TellyMonster

Recommended Posts

TellyMonster Newbie

Hello -- I'm new here and I'm looking for some input. I would really appreciate any advice that members have to offer.

I just found out that I will be having a scope in 3 weeks to investigate reflux and check for any damage that might be related to gluten.

I had a blood test last July; TTG came back at 13, gliadin IgG at 5 and gliadin IgA at 4 (with greater than 20 being borderline and greater than 25 being positive).

I have some family history of celiac disease & family history of several conditions that can be associated with it.

All my life I've had digestive problems, GI pain, problems with multiple foods; symptoms of both allergy and intolerance.

I have not had any weight loss or any classic presentation that screams celiac disease, but I do have a multitude of problems that do fit with it or can be linked or associated with it. Including what might possibly be dermatitis herpetiformis on my scalp. In fact, the more I learn, the more connections I find and sometimes it seems like all roads are leading back to the same place.

I eliminated gluten (incl. oats) in mid-November 08, so I have been gluten-free for a little over 3 full months. I have seen some improvement with this diet, in addition to eliminating other food allergens. But there are still problems.

My regular doctor believes that the negative-range result doesn't need any further investigation and can be dismissed. I saw another doctor for something else and he is the one sending my for the scope, but since I have only 3 weeks to prepare I am trying to find out if that is enough time to be back on gluten.

The info out there seems conflicted, some sources appear to say that this is enough time, others say you need at least 4-6 weeks or 6-8 weeks.

I am not sure it is worth doing if it will not or might not make any difference, as I am now more or less adjusted to the diet and feeling somewhat better.

Any thoughts?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Tallforagirl Rookie
...I saw another doctor for something else and he is the one sending my for the scope, but since I have only 3 weeks to prepare I am trying to find out if that is enough time to be back on gluten.

The info out there seems conflicted, some sources appear to say that this is enough time, others say you need at least 4-6 weeks or 6-8 weeks.

I am not sure it is worth doing if it will not or might not make any difference, as I am now more or less adjusted to the diet and feeling somewhat better.

Any thoughts?

There doesn't seem to be a complete consensus on how long/how much constitutes gluten challenge, but most sources seem to say 6 weeks to 3 months, four slices of bread or equivalent daily. If you're going to do the scope anyway, it might be worth putting it back a bit and giving yourself at least six weeks back on a gluten-heavy diet.

You didn't say whether your total IGA was measured when your blood tests were taken. If your IGA was lower than normal range, this would make the tTG IGA and the anti-gliadin IGA results inaccurate. Not all celiacs test positive with blood tests so even though your tests were inconclusive if you still have symptoms that point to celiac disease it's worth further investigation. Try to keep an open mind that it may not be celiac disease though.

Are they taking biopsies to check for celiac disease when they do your scope or is a just a look-see? You would need to have biopsies taken for them to be able to properly check for villi damage. Sometimes they can see signs of celiac disease just by looking through the scope, but not always, and it needs to be confirmed by looking at biopsies under microscope. At least four random biopsies should be taken.

TellyMonster Newbie
You didn't say whether your total IGA was measured when your blood tests were taken. If your IGA was lower than normal range, this would make the tTG IGA and the anti-gliadin IGA results inaccurate. Not all celiacs test positive with blood tests so even though your tests were inconclusive if you still have symptoms that point to celiac disease it's worth further investigation. Try to keep an open mind that it may not be celiac disease though.

Are they taking biopsies to check for celiac disease when they do your scope or is a just a look-see? You would need to have biopsies taken for them to be able to properly check for villi damage. Sometimes they can see signs of celiac disease just by looking through the scope, but not always, and it needs to be confirmed by looking at biopsies under microscope. At least four random biopsies should be taken.

Hi Tallforagirl, and thank you.

My total IgA was not measured, the only results I received were the three I listed above. So there is yet another potential source of ambiguity.

I have decided to go back on gluten until the scope, if it makes a difference then I will take that as a bonus. If not, I suppose I will be left wondering some more because I won't know if it is clean because of the gluten-free diet or becuase it was never damaged in the first place!

I actually had my blood tested with the aim of ruling it out once and for all. But it hasn't turned out to be so simple! I am looking for an answer, but I will accept whatever it might be -- anything just to get on the road to feeling good.

I am not sure if they will be taking samples. I will insist that they do, if they are going to be in there already. I am dealing with gallbladder problems at the moment and consulted with a surgeon earlier in the week. When I told him about some of the problems I have been experiencing, and my family history, he booked me in for the scope to check things out.

At least it is a step forward after fighting with doctors and trying for so long to get them to listen.

Tallforagirl Rookie
Hi Tallforagirl, and thank you...At least it is a step forward after fighting with doctors and trying for so long to get them to listen.

Good luck with the scope, I hope you get some answers.

ang1e0251 Contributor

I just wanted to add that even if your scope shows no damage there is still a chance that you are gluten intolerant. That will not show on any test. If you feel that is true and you felt healthier when gluten-free, you can go back to the diet after your testing. You do not need a dr to give you permission and it is not harmful for you to follow.

I'm sorry this is so ambiguous, that is the nature of celiac disease. And it's not true that all celiac patients are underweight. I think the percentage is about 1/3 overweight, like me. It's a sneaky thing, isn't it?

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,031
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Julie433
    Newest Member
    Julie433
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Suze046
      Yeah I think my body is definitely telling me to lay off the alcohol I just don’t seem to agree with it right now but that might be because my gut is still trying to heal. 
    • Gwen myers
      We are a couple with celiac trying to find a concierge doctor in Palm Beach Gardens/West Palm/ Jupiter area that has knowledge of celiac .  Help!
    • Mettedkny
      Thank you so much for your validation. I completely agree with you that the crackers COULD be the culprit even with very small trace amounts (less than 20ppm) and accumulating over time - I am at the point where I am about to request that my son gets retested to make sure that my "control subject" is still testing perfectly lol. I have a meeting with my celiac disease doc tomorrow and will run the crackers by him to see if he is willing to retest in a few weeks. I have not had any of them for the past 3 weeks so far, so fingers crossed, we can retest and hopefully find out if it is them. And no - I have been scouring EVERYTHING to make sure nothing else has changed. Only use gluten-free lip products and toothpaste so not there either (but very good suggestion). Thank you for validating me. I feel like many are just saying "you are not being gluten-free enough - but I do have a perfect 16 year track record that proves otherwise - so has to be something sneaky.
    • Mettedkny
      OMG thank you so much for validating me in my "craziness" of being on the hunt for the culprit in my case. "Unfortunately" I do not eat any of the foods you mention, but have stopped eating the crackers that are labeled certified gluten-free to see if they might be the problem. I did NOT know about chicken being injected with gluten liquid - that is horrible!  Hoping my doc will agree to retest after I have been off the crackers for a while. My biggest mystery is - why do I not have ANY symptoms of being cross contaminated or glutened? There is no damage (thank godness) to my villi, and normally I will get canker sores the moment something is even the slightest bit cross contaminated... the hunt continues and I will follow up once I find the answer. Glad you found yours! 
    • Winnie-Ther-Pooh
      Fascinating, thanks! So Canada (at least in 2017) had changed the criteria for detection in oat products from 20 to 5ppm. If the regulation still stands in 2025 then that would mean that any product sold in Canada that contains oats and is claimed to be gluten-free must (theoretically) test less than 5ppm... 
×
×
  • Create New...