Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Endoscopy Results


bunzilla

Recommended Posts

bunzilla Newbie

I had an endoscopy six weeks ago. Before I had it done I talked to the surgeon about the fact that I was already diagnosed with DH through blood work and skin biopsy from a dermatologist. I specifically told him I already knew I have celiac and needed to have biopsy done to rule out things like cancer. After surgery GI said I should get results in a couple of weeks.

Six weeks later his nurse calls to tell me they had no results due to insufficient sample material.

She wanted to know if I wanted to schdule an appt. with GI, I asked for what reason, she replied good question, but she thought to discuss doing it again. I didn't know what to think, my head was kind of swimming a the time. The thought of going through all that crap again, the expense, the day off work, needing a ride home from hospital. Not that it was painful or anything, just the hassle,you know? I told her to have the GI call me. she said she will but he's on vacation till next week.

So, my question, do I need to redo this procedure? My work just changed ins. with a much higher deductable so there will be significant expense. I know money shouldn't be a factor, but it does play a part. Especially if it's not really needed.

I haven't discussed this with my dermatologist yet, I have an appt. in a couple weeks. I will seek his opinion on the matter and also my pcp's opinion. I just thought I would poll you fine people for some insight in the meantime.

Ths forum is a great tool and a wealth of knowledge that I have used often.

thanks for any input.

E.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Guest scully

Oh, that's a bunch of crap, that!!! I can't believe they goofed and didn't take enough samples and then have the gall to ask if you can do it OVER AGAIN? How ridiculous!!!! I would tell them to forget it. They screwed up, you shouldn't have to pay through the nose and go through all that again. That is really nervy of them to even ask you to come back in!

You already have your celiac Dx with your DH, and that should be that. The only other thing that might be less expensive if you still feel like you need GI proof is to have a celiac panel done. That being said, there are sometimes false negatives, but still, better than having to have another major procedure done.

Just my two cents'. :)

mushroom Proficient
I had an endoscopy six weeks ago. Before I had it done I talked to the surgeon about the fact that I was already diagnosed with DH through blood work and skin biopsy from a dermatologist. I specifically told him I already knew I have celiac and needed to have biopsy done to rule out things like cancer. After surgery GI said I should get results in a couple of weeks.

Six weeks later his nurse calls to tell me they had no results due to insufficient sample material.

She wanted to know if I wanted to schdule an appt. with GI, I asked for what reason, she replied good question, but she thought to discuss doing it again. I didn't know what to think, my head was kind of swimming a the time. The thought of going through all that crap again, the expense, the day off work, needing a ride home from hospital. Not that it was painful or anything, just the hassle,you know? I told her to have the GI call me. she said she will but he's on vacation till next week.

So, my question, do I need to redo this procedure? My work just changed ins. with a much higher deductable so there will be significant expense. I know money shouldn't be a factor, but it does play a part. Especially if it's not really needed.

I haven't discussed this with my dermatologist yet, I have an appt. in a couple weeks. I will seek his opinion on the matter and also my pcp's opinion. I just thought I would poll you fine people for some insight in the meantime.

Ths forum is a great tool and a wealth of knowledge that I have used often.

thanks for any input.

E.

What Scully said. The flamin' nerve of it!! What you wanted was to rule out other things, not diagnose celiac. What did he see??? How frustrating.

ravenwoodglass Mentor

Since your concern and reason for having the procedure was to look for cancer or a precancerous condition and not for diagnosis of celiac I would ask for a call back from the doctor. If the biopsies were done only to look for celiac and were not biopsies of areas that looked 'abnormal' and might be questionable then I would not go through the procedure again. Cancerous or precancerous lesions, as far as I know, do have a 'look' to them your doctor will be able to tell you if that was what he biopsied. If you have DH as you know you are already diagnosed with celiac.

wildwood Apprentice

They should really repeat the biopsy at no charge to you since it is their fault there was not enough of a sample. My daughter had an endoscopy which came back normal. The thing is they did it before her celiac panel came back. I don't think they took her symptoms seriously at first. When the lab panel came back extremely positive, I got a call that the doctor wanted to repeat the biopsy and it would be at no charge to us. The second one came back negative also. Go figure.......

Takala Enthusiast

Oh, and he's "on vacation," huh ? I don't think so.

Go to the office Monday and tell them you are not leaving without a copy of the test report. When they balk, tell them it's the law you are entitled to a copy. Besides, what was the dimwit reading off of ? For the love of ***, it does NOT take six weeks to get a lab test back.

Then call your health insurance (what you used to have) and ask if they reimbursed him for the procedure yet. Yes or no, no waffle answers accepted.

my work just changed insurance with a much higher .... expense.

Yeah, how convenient for the doctor that you just happen to need another procedure, so you'd have to pay those costs upfront. And then trying to generate more revenue by asking you if you wanted to come in for another office visit to "discuss" this.

I would then contact your state's attorney general and file a complaint. Perhaps the state medical board also.

I don't know what your diet status is, but the longer you don't eat gluten the more likely it is that your test comes back normal..... you would have to be eating gluten continuously for weeks to get a positive result.... if you've gone off of gluten, you'd have to then go back on it, potentially making yourself ill.... surely Dr. Ripoff knows this and doesn't care.... hence he has the nurse call you while "on vacation."

bunzilla Newbie

Thanks for the input, I should mention that the day of the procedure GI did say that it was definately positve for celiac.

He showed me a pic of the damage to the duedonum? So having celiac is not the issue, I do, and I carry on.

My dermatologist ordered the test to biopsy for cancer because of the increased risk.

I am leaning against having it done again, but like I said I need to talk to GI and Derm.

to get an informed opinion. Now if they offer to do it free, which I doubt they will, I would be more inclined to do it.

Just to have the peace of mind of a clean bill of health.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



bunzilla Newbie

UPDATE: I got a call from GI Fri. He seemed to think I was seeking a definate diagnosis of celiac, which I already had through skin biopsy and bloodwork. He said there wasn't enough material for diagnosis. The lab couldn't get the sample to "lay out right"?.

I restated that the only answer I was seeking was in regard to possible cancer.

He did say that there was no evidence of cancer and he felt we could rule that out. I told him I was doing much better being gluten-free and considered myself pos. for celiac regardless of endo. biopsy results.

no repeat endo. for me :D

ravenwoodglass Mentor
UPDATE: I got a call from GI Fri. He seemed to think I was seeking a definate diagnosis of celiac, which I already had through skin biopsy and bloodwork. He said there wasn't enough material for diagnosis. The lab couldn't get the sample to "lay out right"?.

I restated that the only answer I was seeking was in regard to possible cancer.

He did say that there was no evidence of cancer and he felt we could rule that out. I told him I was doing much better being gluten-free and considered myself pos. for celiac regardless of endo. biopsy results.

no repeat endo. for me :D

I am glad he got back to you. I am sure you are relieved at the good news.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Wheatwacked replied to MauraBue's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      2

      Have Tru Joy Sweets Choco Chews been discontinued??

    2. - Theresa2407 replied to chrish42's topic in Doctors
      6

      Doctors and Celiac.com

    3. - Scott Adams replied to MauraBue's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      2

      Have Tru Joy Sweets Choco Chews been discontinued??

    4. - Scott Adams replied to chrish42's topic in Doctors
      6

      Doctors and Celiac.com

    5. - trents replied to catnapt's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      5

      how much gluten do I need to eat before blood tests?

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,261
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Joanne Ham
    Newest Member
    Joanne Ham
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.6k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Wheatwacked
      M&M Peanuts. About the same calories and sugar while M&M Peanuts have fiber, potassium, iron and protein that Tootsie Rolls ("We are currently producing more than 50 million Tootsie Rolls each day.") don't. Click the links to compare nutritional values.  Both are made with sugar, not high fructose corn syrup.  I use them as a gluten free substitute for a peanut butter sandwich.  Try her on grass fed, pasture fed milk. While I get heartburn at night from commercial dairy milk, I do not from 'grassmilk'.     
    • Theresa2407
      I see it everyday on my feeds.  They go out and buy gluten-free processed products and wonder why they can't heal their guts.  I don't think they take it as a serious immune disease. They pick up things off the internet which is so far out in left field.  Some days I would just like to scream.  So much better when we had support groups and being able to teach them properly. I just had an EMA blood test because I haven't had one since my Doctor moved away.  Got test results today, doctor ordered a D3 vitamin test.  Now you know what  type of doctors we have.  Now I will have to pay for this test because she just tested my D3 end of December, and still have no idea about my EMA.    
    • Scott Adams
      Some of the Cocomels are gluten and dairy-free: https://cocomels.com/collections/shop-page
    • Scott Adams
      Thank you for the kind words! I keep thinking that things in the medical community are improving, but a shocking number of people still post here who have already discovered gluten is their issue, and their doctors ordered a blood test and/or endoscopy for celiac disease, yet never mentioned that the protocol for such screening requires them to be eating gluten daily for weeks beforehand. Many have already gone gluten-free during their pre-screening period, thus their test results end up false negative, leaving them confused and sometimes untreated. It is sad that so few doctors attended your workshops, but it doesn't surprise me. It seems like the protocols for any type of screening should just pop up on their computer screens whenever any type of medical test is ordered, not just for celiac disease--such basic technological solutions could actually educate those in the medical community over time.
    • trents
      The rate of damage to the villous lining of the SB and the corresponding loss of nutrient absorbing efficiency varies tremendously from celiac to celiac. Yes, probably is dose dependent if, by dose dependent you mean the amount of exposure to gluten. But damage rates and level of sensitivity also seem to depend on the genetic profile. Those with both genes HLA-DQ2 and HLA-DQ8 seem to be more sensitive to minor amounts of gluten exposure than those with just one of those genes and those with only DQ2 seem to be more sensitive than those with only DQ8. But there are probably many factors that influence the damage rate to the villi as well as intensity of reaction to exposure. There is still a lot we don't know. One of the gray areas is in regard to those who are "silent" celiacs, i.e. those who seem to be asymptomatic or whose symptoms are so minor that they don't garner attention. When they get a small exposure (such as happens in cross contamination) and have no symptoms does that equate to no inflammation? We don't necessarily know. The "sensitive" celiac knows without a doubt, however, when they get exposure from cross contamination and the helps them know better what food products to avoid.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.