Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Getting Tested


gfpagan

Recommended Posts

gfpagan Apprentice

If I am going 100% gluten free because of gluten intolerance is getting tested for celiac necessary? Either way I'm going to be gluten free and it's not like they are going to cure me for knowing for sure. Anyone else in the same boat?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



maile Newbie
If I am going 100% gluten free because of gluten intolerance is getting tested for celiac necessary? Either way I'm going to be gluten free and it's not like they are going to cure me for knowing for sure. Anyone else in the same boat?

the short answer is No, you don't need to be tested. Some feel it's easier because there is less resistance to having a gluten-free diet if you have an official diagnosis but as many have said you don't need a Dr's permission to go gluten-free.

I'm self diagnosed, my Dr is a wonderful guy but old school and has trouble with the fact that I am not losing tons of weight yet still claim to be gluten intolerant. (he keeps sending me for blood tests even tho I tell him not to bother because I haven't eaten enough gluten for it to register ;) )

there are many self diagnosed on this board and others. given how hard it is to diagnose celiac by conventional testing it's not surprising many have just decided to forgo gluten rather than go through a gluten challenge just to maybe be diagnosed.

gfpagan Apprentice

Great reply! that makes me feel more confident in my decision. I hate the idea of having to go back on gluten to get a test that may or may not tell me something that I'm going to do anyway.

Thank you!

the short answer is No, you don't need to be tested. Some feel it's easier because there is less resistance to having a gluten-free diet if you have an official diagnosis but as many have said you don't need a Dr's permission to go gluten-free.

I'm self diagnosed, my Dr is a wonderful guy but old school and has trouble with the fact that I am not losing tons of weight yet still claim to be gluten intolerant. (he keeps sending me for blood tests even tho I tell him not to bother because I haven't eaten enough gluten for it to register ;) )

there are many self diagnosed on this board and others. given how hard it is to diagnose celiac by conventional testing it's not surprising many have just decided to forgo gluten rather than go through a gluten challenge just to maybe be diagnosed.

Tallforagirl Rookie
If I am going 100% gluten free because of gluten intolerance is getting tested for celiac necessary? Either way I'm going to be gluten free and it's not like they are going to cure me for knowing for sure. Anyone else in the same boat?

You may not need to know, but if you're not going to get tested I'd err on side of caution and get a full blood count and bone density test. Vitamin deficiencies and osteoperosis are very common amongst undiagnosed celiacs, but both treatable if caught early.

rinne Apprentice

Hi. :)

I agree, blood work to look at your vitamin and mineral levels is a very good idea, many celiacs are deficient in B and D vitamins and supplementing with them can be very helpful.

I never went the route of testing because I too understood that gluten was a problem for me, in my case though a brother and sister both diagnosed through endoscopy made the decision easy.

gfpagan Apprentice

I wouldn't need to go back on gluten to get these tests done right? Maybe I'll make an appointment with a diet change and talk to them about tests that should be done.

Hi. :)

I agree, blood work to look at your vitamin and mineral levels is a very good idea, many celiacs are deficient in B and D vitamins and supplementing with them can be very helpful.

I never went the route of testing because I too understood that gluten was a problem for me, in my case though a brother and sister both diagnosed through endoscopy made the decision easy.

rinne Apprentice
I wouldn't need to go back on gluten to get these tests done right? Maybe I'll make an appointment with a diet change and talk to them about tests that should be done.

Nope, no gluten required for these tests. :)

And congratulations on having the confidence to make a choice for yourself.

I think the gluten challenge is a horrific thing to do to our bodies, somehow being sick enough to feel like you are dying and eating the foods that are making you feel this way in order to do enough damage that they can see it just doesn't work for me. :lol:


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



gfpagan Apprentice

Thank you (-: I feel good knowing I discovered it myself and didn't have the frustration (at least too much) of doctors trying to tell me otherwise.

Nope, no gluten required for these tests. :)

And congratulations on having the confidence to make a choice for yourself.

I think the gluten challenge is a horrific thing to do to our bodies, somehow being sick enough to feel like you are dying and eating the foods that are making you feel this way in order to do enough damage that they can see it just doesn't work for me. :lol:

Leper Messiah Apprentice

I'm in the same boat although I'm weighing up tackling the stoopid gluten challenge just to get a prescription for gluten free food (from the NHS in the UK) - it is literally costing me a fortune. Here's hoping a better way to test and confirm gluten intolerance is not too far away.

one more mile Contributor

There should be a better way to be tested. I have not been tested and can not imagine Eating what I know is poison just to find out officially that it is. In the uk will they accept the DNA test?

ang1e0251 Contributor

I think it is barbaric to make you eat gluten for weeks for a test. Come on, do you know any GI dr that would rub poison ivy all over his body every day for 3 months just so it could do a huge amount of damage to skin to dx it?

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,207
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    WAB19
    Newest Member
    WAB19
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      NCGS does not cause damage to the small bowel villi so, if indeed you were not skimping on gluten when you had the antibody blood testing done, it is likely you have celiac disease.
    • Scott Adams
      I will assume you did the gluten challenge properly and were eating a lot of gluten daily for 6-8 weeks before your test, but if not, that could be the issue. You can still have celiac disease with negative blood test results, although it's not as common:  Clinical and genetic profile of patients with seronegative coeliac disease: the natural history and response to gluten-free diet: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5606118/  Seronegative Celiac Disease - A Challenging Case: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9441776/  Enteropathies with villous atrophy but negative coeliac serology in adults: current issues: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34764141/  Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If your symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet it would likely signal NCGS.
    • Xravith
      I'm very confused... My blood test came out negative, I checked all antibodies. I suppose my Total IgA levels are normal (132 mg/dl), so the test should be reliable. Still, I'm not relieved as I can't tolerate even a single biscuit. I need to talk to my doctor about whether a duodenal biopsy is necessary. But it is really possible to have intestinal damage despite having a seronegative results? I have really strong symptoms, and I don't want to keep skipping university lectures or being bedridden at home.
    • Scott Adams
      They may want to also eliminate other possible causes for your symptoms/issues and are doing additional tests.  Here is info about blood tests for celiac disease--if positive an endoscopy where biopsies of your intestinal villi are taken to confirm is the typical follow up.    
    • Scott Adams
      In the Europe the new protocol for making a celiac disease diagnosis in children is if their tTg-IgA (tissue transglutaminase IgA) levels are 10 times or above the positive level for celiac disease--and you are above that level. According to the latest research, if the blood test results are at certain high levels that range between 5-10 times the reference range for a positive celiac disease diagnosis, it may not be necessary to confirm the results using an endoscopy/biopsy: Blood Test Alone Can Diagnose Celiac Disease in Most Children and Adults TGA-IgA at or Above Five Times Normal Limit in Kids Indicates Celiac Disease in Nearly All Cases No More Biopsies to Diagnose Celiac Disease in Children! May I ask why you've had so many past tTg-IgA tests done, and many of them seem to have been done 3 times during short time intervals?    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.