Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

3yo Negative Bloodwork, But Intense Rash Cleared Up Since Going gluten-free?


kmama

Recommended Posts

kmama Newbie

I've been suspicious about wheat bothering my 3 yo for about 6 months. His behavior has been strange after eating wheat and he has had persistent red cheeks, red splotches on inside of elbows and knees. All this cleared up when I took him off gluten. Then, I did a challenge to get him officially tested for celiac. GI doctor said he needs to be on for at least 3 weeks. After one week back on gluten he broke out in an intensely itchy rash. It started on his neck & ear, spread to face, torso, legs and arms and lower back. It was so miserable for him. Ped and dermatologist said it wasn't anything 'typical' looking. Dermatologist said it looked like it could be dermatitis herpetiformis, did a skin biopsy which I'm still waiting to hear results from.

That day after seeing the dermatologist I told the GI doctor I can't keep feeding him gluten and watching him suffer, so he told me to go ahead and get the blood drawn for the celiac panel. He'd been on gluten for 15 days, then off for 36 hours when he had the blood drawn. I just heard from the GI doctor that the results were negative for celiac. It was sooo obvious that the rash was related to gluten. It started clearing up as soon as he was off it. He's been gluten-free for a week now and the rash is mostly gone except for a few spots on torso and arm.

I'm wondering if I should trust those blood test results or not. Any advice? I'm not going to put him back on gluten b/c I'm too nervous about the rash coming back. I am just frustrated to not have an answer for definitely what was causing the rash.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



lizajane Rookie

honestly, it sounds like you already know what is causing the rash. if he feels better gluten free, the stay gluten free. you don't need a diagnosis to eat a certain way. if he feels good that way, then it is best for him regardless of test results.

weluvgators Explorer
I'm wondering if I should trust those blood test results or not. Any advice? I'm not going to put him back on gluten b/c I'm too nervous about the rash coming back. I am just frustrated to not have an answer for definitely what was causing the rash.

It will be interesting to find out what the biopsy shows! I have three symptomatic children. My middle child was our first alert to the issues we have with gluten, as she has never tolerated any. I did not understand the extent of our sensitivity when we started our gluten free journey, but we have never in her life been able to do a gluten challenge.

I recently went to see Dr. Fasano speak, and we were given a chance to ask him questions after his talk. I explained our symptoms and extreme measures for staying gluten free, and he agreed that a symptomatic child should not be on gluten.

There is SO MUCH going on for these children during these critical development years. Gluten can do irreparable harm to those who are celiac and/or gluten intolerant. We remain gluten free and do not see that changing in our future.

You may still get your definitive answer to what is causing the rash, but I don't know that it makes the gluten free diet any easier.

swalker Newbie

His body told you it doesn't do well with gluten. Your challenge was just as definate a diagnosis as a blood test would have been.

ang1e0251 Contributor

Just know there are many false negatives in the bloodwork of young children. I wouldn't take those test results seriuosly. When he is older, if you choose to go through a gluten challenge, you can have him re-tested but even then, blood results are iffy.

As the other posters have already pointed out, you're reading his body signs that gluten is harmful to him. THat's all that's needed. Your Mom instincts are better than his test results.

GottaSki Mentor

Ditto....trust your instinct. Blood tests for Celiac Disease rarely diagnosis, only indicate possibility of Celiac - an endoscopy is needed for confirmation. If you already know there is an adverse reaction to gluten you don't need to know anything else with a 3 year old. In the future if a diagnosis is needed...there are ways to accomplish this and who knows there may be a better way than endoscopy in the coming years.

Good Luck and great detective work Mom!

OptimisticMom42 Apprentice

Hello Kmama,

My son's blood test also came back negative. His symptoms are also pretty obvious. He's 18 yrs old and wants to be a normal guy so he'll tell you he doesn't have celiacs. But given the choice between cheerios (and D) or rice chex, he'll eat the rice chex. He also eats my gluten free cookies and drinks my rice milk :huh:

Most of the food in our house is now gluten, dairy and soy free and my kids have been very good about the changes. Last night we made gluten free spag and Fruity Pebbles (not rice chrispy) treats. That's not a huge departure from what our meals looked like before we found that I have celiacs and that at least one of my children probably does.

You know Kmama before you found out about gluten you made other choices for your child. You decided that to much candy was bad for his teeth, that he needed to eat his fruits and vegetables and that maybe ramen noodles were to high in sodium. This is no different. You are the MOM. The dr is only the dr. Offering your child healthy alternatives to processed foods is a good thing!

Take care,

OptimisticMom42


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,029
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Jen72
    Newest Member
    Jen72
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      Your experience is both shocking and critically important for the community to hear, underscoring the terrifying reality that cross-contamination can extend into the most unexpected and invasive medical devices. It is absolutely devastating that you had to endure six months of sickness and ultimately sustain permanent vision loss because a doctor dismissed your legitimate, life-altering condition. Your relentless research and advocacy, from discovering the gluten in MMA acrylic to finding a compassionate prosthodontist, is a testament to your strength in a system that often fails celiac patients. While the scientific and medical consensus is that gluten cannot be absorbed through the skin or eyes (as the molecules are too large to pass through these barriers), your story highlights a terrifying gray area: what about a substance *permanently implanted inside the body*, where it could potentially shed microparticles or cause a localized immune reaction? Your powerful warning about acrylic lenses and the drastic difference with the silicone alternative is invaluable information. Thank you for sharing your harrowing journey and the specific, severe neurological symptoms you endure; it is a stark reminder that celiac is a systemic disease, and your advocacy is undoubtedly saving others from similar trauma.
    • Scott Adams
      Those are driving distance from me--I will try to check them out, thanks for sharing!
    • Scott Adams
      I am so sorry you're going through this bad experience--it's difficult when your own lived reality of cause and effect is dismissed by the very professionals meant to help you. You are absolutely right—your violent physical reactions are not "what you think," but undeniable data points, and it's a form of medical gaslighting to be told otherwise, especially when you have a positive HLA-DQ2 gene and a clear clinical picture. Since your current "celiac specialist" is not addressing the core issue or your related conditions like SIBO and chronic fatigue, it may be time for a strategic pivot. Instead of trying to "reprove" your celiac disease to unwilling ears, consider seeking out a new gastroenterologist or functional medicine doctor, and frame the conversation around managing the complications of a confirmed gluten-free diet for celiac disease. Go in and say, "I have celiac disease, am strictly gluten-free, but I am still suffering from these specific complications: SIBO, chronic fatigue, dermatological issues, and high blood pressure linked to pain. I need a partner to help me address these related conditions." This shifts the focus from a debate about your diagnosis to a collaborative plan for your current suffering, which is the help you truly need and deserve to work toward bouncing back.
    • NanCel
      Hello, no I had to have them re done and then used a liner over the top.  Many dentists are not aware of the celiac effects.  Best of luck.   There is other material, yet, very expensive.
    • sleuth
      He is not just a psychiatrist.  He is also a neuroscientist.  And yes, I have already read those studies.   I agree with benfotiamine.  This is short term while glutened/inflammation occurs.  As I had already mentioned, these symptoms no longer exist when this phase passes.  And yes, I know that celiac is a disease of malnutrition.  We are working with a naturopath.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.