Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Restaurants


Lisa

Recommended Posts

Lisa Mentor

A recent trend (well maybe not a trend) that I am seeing, are restaurants recalling their gluten free menus. People complain when they get sick and the restaurants no longer want to hold that responsibility. I don't' blame them. What once was a gesture of good will toward the Celiac community and those gluten intolerant, now is becoming a liability.

I personally believe that I hold all responsibility at a restaurant regarding what I order and put in my mouth. I am educated as to what I can safely eat and I assume all risk dining outside of my home. Although, when I order with simple, non-demanding specifics, I expect it to be served as it was ordered.

What are your thoughts?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



hermitgirl Contributor

I like the concept of a gluten free menu, but there is always the concern about cross contamination issue. My biggest thing is asking about ingredients. I spoke to the manager and the owner at a restauruant that opened a few days ago. I asked them if they have anything that was safe for someone who couldn't have anything with gluten, or wheat derivitives. Both were completely clueless, so I asked about ingredients in flavoring and seasoning, they were still clueless. Having a gluten free menu helps the servers, management, and customers decide what is considered gluten free, but you are in a restaurant. There is always a risk for cross contamination. I think it is odd that restaurants are pulling these menus, when you have places like Unos and Boston's spending a lot of money to promote their gluten free pizzas. I can understand restaurants not publicly promoting menus for special diets, but given the number of people with food allergies and special diet restrictions you would think that they would at least attempt to keep this option open. You don't see them pulling their menus for people who want to watch their calories or eat "heart healthy".

Sorry about the rambling, but the main thing is these restaurants have gone out of their way to try to serve us, there will always be a risk for contamination, and there will always be a chance for an accidental mix up. How many times did restaurants get my order wrong before I was diagnosed?

I think that it is not wrong to let a restaurant know if there was an issue, as they should be aware if there was a major problem, but being held "liable"?? I can see liability for an entire room of diners getting food poisining, but not for a one time, one diner issue. Now a restaurant that totes a menu and promotes it, but doesn't follow it, and many people regularly get sick, again, I can see that issue.

I just get frustrated that it takes so little before companies have this knee jerk response, and everyone else suffers because of something a few individuals did.

tarnalberry Community Regular

I think it really depends on where the restaurant draws the line.

If it's "here's this menu, that's all we're doing"... well, yeah, I'd rather them withdraw the menu. If the staff isn't trained, the menu is kind of worthless to me. I'm just jumping blindly off something I can't see.

If it's "here's the menu, we've trained the staff what this is, that's all we're doing"... I think I'm fine with that, but know that eating there is very much at my own risk. I'm bungee jumping all alone here.

If it's "here's the menu, we regularly remind the staff how to work with this, that's all we're doing"... I'm much more likely to go to the place. It's still my own risk, but I'm bungee jumping with people who have done it once before.

If it's "here's the menu, we regularly remind the staff how to work with this, and we've allocated kitchen space to have room to deal with contamination concerns"... I'm going to advertise the heck out of that place and frequent that place. It's STILL my own risk, but I'm now bungee jumping tandem with experts.

astyanax Rookie

who has pulled their gluten-free menus?

Lombardi25 Apprentice

I believe that Texas Roadhouse pulled there's in the last year (don't quote me on that).

I find some restaurants (like many probably do) to go above and beyond and others to be totally lazy and inept about it.

For example, 99 has gluten-free menus now online and in the restaurant, and one of the items on the gluten-free is FF's. Sometimes I go or call (for take out) and the manager will say the friolator is dedicated for just gluten-free stuff, then the next time a manager will come on and say "he can't gaurantee someone didn't throw something that's not gluten-free in there..."

I mean consistency? I think I'm about 2 for 5 now, and the 2 times make me wonder if I even got a dedicated friolator, since then I haven't even gone back, I'm sick of them. Don't put on the menu if you can't prepare it gluten-free.

Anyways, that's my rant.

In general I agree with the last post by tarna, places like Outback (as much as I'd love to see THEM get more into fun gluten-free appetizers and/or FF's) and a semi-local (even though they have some other non New England locations) such as Burton's Grill (which do buns/breads/fries/pasta gluten-free) and another place in northern NH called Rafferty's Pub, all those places go through great great strides to ensure everything is prepared gluten-free and their staff (for the most part, Outback does make me nevous sometimes based on some past experiences) are really up to snuff on the whole gluten-free thing.

I mention my nervousness about Outback, one time I did have an pretty bad experience with ordering ribs, first order came ON TOP of FF's, the next came with a dish of carmelized apples leaning against it lol (which it says NOT to order if you are gluten-free), finally after a little pow wow with the manage the third came out PERFECT (after everyone was done eating of course) and free of charge.

Oh well, that's some of my thoughts on the matter, rambled a little off topic but anyways :-) Happy gluten-free eating, and screw lazy restaurants like Applebees that don't even want to try to accomodate us lol.

lizard00 Enthusiast

I think a lot of the difference comes between restaurants that actually prepare the majority of their food on the premises, versus a place like Applebee's that takes it out of a bag and either cooks it or slaps it on a plate. A long time ago, I asked for something to be left off of a salad at Applebee's, and they replied that they couldn't because it came packaged that way.

I find I definitely stick to places that prepare their food in house, for a number of reasons. But the top two being that it is always fresher and tastes better, and the cook there actually knows and can control what goes into the food.

As to the original issue raised by Momma Goose... I assume the risk, too. There's a difference in my salad coming out with croutons while I have told them not to (that's just downright negligence) to a busy cook/chef forgetting to wash a pan or something because it's not customary for them to do so. It's a tough spot for the restaurants to be in.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - trents replied to Roses8721's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      8

      GI DX celiac despite neg serology and no biopsy

    2. - Roses8721 posted a topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      0

      gluten-free Oatmeal

    3. - Roses8721 replied to Roses8721's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      8

      GI DX celiac despite neg serology and no biopsy

    4. - Scott Adams replied to Ginger38's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      5

      Shingles - Could It Be Related to Gluten/ Celiac

    5. - Scott Adams replied to Xravith's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      3

      Challenges eating gluten before biopsy


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,474
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Silk tha Shocker
    Newest Member
    Silk tha Shocker
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):




  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Certainly, it would b wise to have a gene test done if your physician is open to it as it would provide some more data to understand what's going on. But keep in mind that the genetic test for celiac disease cannot be used as to diagnose celiac disease, only to establish the potential to develop active celiac disease. About 40% of the general population possess one or both of the primary genes known to be associated with the development of active celiac disease but only about 1% of the population actually develop active celiac disease. So, the gene test is an effective "rule out" tool but not an effective diagnostic tool.
    • Roses8721
      Had Quaker gluten-free oatmeal last night and my stomach is a mess today. NO flu but def stomach stuff. Anyone else?
    • Roses8721
      So you would be good with the diagnosis and not worry to check genetics etc etc? Appreciate your words!
    • Scott Adams
      As recommended by @Flash1970, you may want to get this: https://www.amazon.com/Curist-Lidocaine-Maximum-Strength-Topical/dp/B09DN7GR14/
    • Scott Adams
      For those who will likely remain gluten-free for life anyway due to well-known symptoms they have when eating gluten, my general advice is to ignore any doctors who push to go through a gluten challenge to get a formal diagnosis--and this is especially true for those who have severe symptoms when they eat gluten. It can take months, or even years to recover from such a challenge, so why do this if you already know that gluten is the culprit and you won't be eating it anyway?  Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If your symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet it would likely signal NCGS--but those in this group will usually have negative tests, or at best, elevated antibodies that don't reach the level of official positive. Unfortunately test results for celiac disease are not always definitive, and many errors can be made when doing an endoscopy for celiac disease, and they can happen in many ways, for example not collecting the samples in the right areas, not collecting enough samples, or not interpreting the results properly and giving a Marsh score.  Many biopsy results can also be borderline, where there may be certain damage that could be associated with celiac disease, but it just doesn't quite reach the level necessary to make a formal diagnosis. The same is true for blood test results. Over the last 10 years or so a new "Weak Positive" range has been created by many labs for antibody results, which can simply lead to confusion (some doctors apparently believe that this means the patient can decide if they want more testing or to go gluten-free). There is no "Weak Negative" category, for example. Many patients are not told to eat gluten daily, lots of it, for the 6-8 week period leading up to their blood test, nor asked whether or not they've been eating gluten. Some patients even report to their doctors that they've been gluten-free for weeks or months before their blood tests, yet their doctors incorrectly say nothing to them about how this can affect their test, and create false negative results. Many people are not routinely given a total IGA blood test when doing a blood screening, which can lead to false negative interpretations if the patient has low IGA. We've seen on this forum many times that some doctors who are not fully up on how interpret the blood test results can tell patients that the don't need to follow a gluten-free diet or get more testing because only 1 of the 2 or 3 tests done in their panel is positive (wrong!), and the other 1 or 2 tests are negative.  Dermatologists often don't know how to do a proper skin biopsy for dermatitis herpetiformis, and when they do it wrongly their patient will continue to suffer with terrible DH itching, and all the risks associated with celiac disease. For many, the DH rash is the only presentation of celiac disease. These patients may end up on strong prescriptions for life to control their itching which also may have many negative side effects, for example Dapsone. Unfortunately many people will continue to suffer needlessly and eat gluten due to these errors in performing or interpreting celiac disease tests, but luckily some will find out about non-celiac gluten sensitivity on their own and go gluten-free and recover from their symptoms. Consider yourself lucky if you've figured out that gluten is the source of your health issues, and you've gone gluten-free, because many people will never figure this out.    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.