Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

So I Saw The Gi Doc


boysmom

Recommended Posts

boysmom Explorer

He started with the 'so what's going on' question, so I told him about my trip to the ER and diagnosis of esophageal spasms. He seemed totally unconvinced that was what was happening, but didn't offer any other explanation for what happened. I also tried to tell him about trying a gluten-free diet and how that seemed to make more difference than the meds did in how I'd been feeling, but his immediate response was that 'celiac enteropathy causes people to lose weight and be malnourished' due to the damage to their intestines, so since I was obviously not thin I couldn't have that. I tried to explain how I was unable to lose weight before the diet change, but was losing now despite eating about 200 extra calories a day because of the substitutions for the diet, but he started talking about how removing bread from the diet can cause weight loss because bread is so full of starches etc...

I should add here that he told me if I just lost weight my indigestion would clear up, because being overweight means when I lay down it presses into my stomach which causes the reflux (that he just said he wasn't convinced I had). I told him I have tried for years to lose weight, even did Weight Watchers for 15 weeks at one point and lost a whopping 5 pounds. No amount of diet and excercise seems to have made any difference. I am 5'4" and have weighed in the neighborhood of 224 +/- for 10 years. I've been logging my food on sparkpeople for several weeks now and was averaging about 1300-1400 calories before changing my diet. Since eating gluten-free it had risen to around 1500 calories, and yet I've lost 10 lbs since the first of June. The last week I've eaten less, about 1100 calories, just not feeling as well and may have been accidentally exposed to gluten or something else that I'm sensitive to, and my weight has leveled back out again. I don't have a problem admitting I'm overweight, what I have a problem with is a doctor who tells me that 'it's all a matter of supply and demand... if you just eat less and exercise more... ' :P If I eat any less I won't have the strength to get off the couch.

At the end of our visit he was only willing to schedule a scope of my esophagus and pin a ph monitor in to see whether I was actually having reflux or not. I decided to go along in hopes that as he eliminates other options, maybe eventually he'll be willing to listen finally. However the day before the procedure was scheduled his office called to tell me that my insurance won't cover the hospital that he works in.

So now I'm back to square one... I have to find a doctor at a hospital that my insurance will cover, start all over explaining to him/her, and now I don't even know where to start to describe what is going on. As this has gone one I've added more and more symptoms to my list of what is happening, and now that I've had a couple of 'attacks' while I was actually fully awake it has become apparent that they are not starting in my esophagus, it starts lower down (stomach? gut? just below my ribs) and as that starts with the twisting and contracting it feels like it pulls on my esophagus and puts pressure on my bowels and bladder. I end up in the bathroom repeatedly over a couple of hours until it all settles down again.

I have written down a detailed log of the progression I've seen, now that I can see a pattern emerging, and I'm thinking about writing down all the things I can see in my history that *could* add up to celiac. Has it been your experience that a doctor will take the time to actually read or even skim something like that? I find that when I start trying to explain and they shoot down my first couple of 'reasons' I give up because I feel like they're not really listening but just shooting down my ideas/explanations. Do you think I should write all of this out or am I just wasting my time?

a very frustrated Luanne

BTW, the good news is that these spasms/attacks/ whatever they are are down to once a week now, the bad news is that I seem to have them for 2 or 3 nights in a row, so I'm not sure it's really progress.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



ravenwoodglass Mentor

I am sorry you had such an awful experience with this doctor. Unfortunately experiences like yours are all to common. If a doctor derived diagnosis is essential for you then do look for another doctor. You do also have the choice of simply going gluten free, sometimes the resolution of issues can be enough for our GPs or Internists to at least recognize that that gluten is an issue. You don't need a doctors permission to be gluten free.

lizard00 Enthusiast

I had a pretty similar experience, too, with my first GI doc. I had pretty much given up and I had already figured that gluten was the issue and as ravenwoodglass said, I didn't need a doc's permission to continue. But I was having some lingering fatigue, and my GP said I really needed to see a GI to rule out any futher food intolerances/allergies, etc. She referred me to a different doc and it was totally worth going. I'm not sure if it made a difference that my GP's office called to set up the appointment, so, I had a little more validation to my claim, or maybe he's just that kind of doc... I don't know. But he seems really up on the latest info, and has been very helpful, and he LISTENED! :o

So, if you are able to have a doc recommend a different GI, or even send to you, that might be helpful. Either way, sounds like you are better off without dealing with him. There are good docs out there, they just are not always easy to find. I hope you find one. :)

boysmom Explorer

I have been eating gluten-free, or as close as I know how, since the beginning of June and have no intention of adding it back into my diet unless/until sensitivity has been totally ruled out of what is going on for me. I am following through with a doctor for a few reasons:

1. These spasms are still going on, so I don't know whether it's just still a part of the healing process or if there's something else going on (ulcer or colon damage) or some other sensitivity still affecting me.

2. If it is celiac disease I can trace a path of at least 18 years of symptoms, if not my whole life and I'm concerned about what damage has been done that I may need to know about sooner rather than later. I am 47 years old and my grandfather died of colon cancer, so I want to be aware of any polyps or early stage cancer asap.

3. If I have celiac disease, I suspect at least some of my sons may as well. Because they range in age from 7-17 I still have them under my control and care for a while longer and would rather they at least have a chance to know earlier in their lives to help prevent future complications for them.

I am working with my husband now to come up with enough money to do the genetic testing on me. I figure if I don't have the genes we can set this aside and focus on looking another direction for explanations, but if I do have the genes maybe it will make the doctors pay more attention to what I'm trying to tell them.

ravenwoodglass Mentor
I am working with my husband now to come up with enough money to do the genetic testing on me. I figure if I don't have the genes we can set this aside and focus on looking another direction for explanations, but if I do have the genes maybe it will make the doctors pay more attention to what I'm trying to tell them.

Please do not take the gene testing to be an absolute yes or no to whether you have celiac or not. Most places only test for 2 out of the at least 7 known celiac related genes. Genes are not an absolute although they can be helpful in the diagnostic process.

Also if you are going to persue fruther blood or biopsy testing you need to keep eating a full gluten diet, if you have been gluten free or gluten light it can give a false negative on the tests.

pchick Rookie
I should add here that he told me if I just lost weight my indigestion would clear up, because being overweight means when I lay down it presses into my stomach which causes the reflux (that he just said he wasn't convinced I had).

I had the same problem! Every western doctor I went to told me to lose weight and/or go on antidepressants, that I was overweight and therefore the pain I feel couldn't really be real.

Where was it written that overweight people are hypochondriacs?? Why can't they just do the tests instead of making you feel like it's all your fault.

I'm 40 now, always been overweight and just now (3 weeks ago) I was diagnosed... after YEARS of being told to go on diets (which I did and gained weight on) and exercise (which I do more than my skinny friends).

Since cutting the gluten a few weeks ago I've lost 7 pounds! and I feel SO MUCH BETTER! I even feel like getting out of bed in the mornings now :) so happy!

Good luck with everything!!

GFinDC Veteran

Hi Luanne,

The genetic testing is not going to prove you have celiac. They have various estimates, but it seems around 30% of the U.S.A. population has the genes for celiac. But only 1% develop the active disease. Another option might be Enterolabs testing. Enterolabs can't prove celiac either, but can show if you have gliaden antibodies in your gut.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



boysmom Explorer
Hi Luanne,

The genetic testing is not going to prove you have celiac. They have various estimates, but it seems around 30% of the U.S.A. population has the genes for celiac. But only 1% develop the active disease. Another option might be Enterolabs testing. Enterolabs can't prove celiac either, but can show if you have gliaden antibodies in your gut.

I realize that having the genes doesn't necessarily mean I have the disease. :) I'm hoping that showing that I have the genes, combined with my symptoms and response to a gluten-free diet, will convince a doctor to take my symptoms seriously and at least consider the possibility. What frustrated me most was that it seemed like he took the facts that I was nervous about whether he would take me seriously (he's not the first doc that took one look and made incorrect assumptions about my dietary habits) and that I am overweight and assumed then that I'm just a head case. My symptoms are NOT in my head, not caused by stress, and not a ploy for attention and I just want them to realize that so we can get down to the business of figuring out what it *is*. :) I'd be thrilled if it turns out that I am able to eat gluten again... that somehow whatever is going on in my gut is making me temporarily senstive... but whatever is going on, I want to know what it is so we can get the problem resolved and not just mask symptoms and hope that's enough.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,650
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Alexandersgirl
    Newest Member
    Alexandersgirl
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Did the GI doc give you any rational for stopping the Tylenol during the gluten challenge? I have never heard of this before and I can't imagine a good reason for it. Ibuprofen, maybe, because it is an anti inflammatory but acetaminophen?  I don't see that it would have any impact on the test results to take Tylenol.
    • Julie 911
      Good day! New members here and I have a question about medication. My gastroenterologist made me stop some medication during the gluten challenge beforenthe screening test but I have a little surgery tomorrow and I need to know if I can use tylenol for half a day or if it will give me false results using it.   Thanks 
    • Scott Adams
      I agree, there can be contamination at many points--milling is another possible source of contamination for any flours.
    • trents
      Keep in mind that with manufactured food products, "gluten free" doesn't equate to no gluten. Things that are naturally gluten free can be cross-contaminated with gluten in the field, in shipping and in processing. In the U.S. companies can use the gluten free label as long as the product doesn't exceed 20ppm of gluten. That amount still may cause a reaction in some people.
    • deanna1ynne
      Dd10 was tested for celiac four years ago bc two siblings were dx’d (positive labs and biopsies). Her results at the time were positive ema  and ttg (7x the UL), but a negative biopsy. We checked again three months later and her ttg was still positive (4x the UL), but ema and biopsy were negative. Doc said it was “potential celiac” and to keep eating gluten, but we were concerned about harming her growth and development while young and had her go gluten-free because we felt the labs and ema in particular were very suggestive of early celiac, despite the negative biopsies. She also had stomach aches and lethargy when eating it. We just felt it’d be better to be safe than sorry. Now, four years later, she doesn’t want to be gluten-free if she doesn’t “have to be,” so underwent a 12 week gluten challenge. She had labs done before starting and all looked great (celiac panel all negative, as expected.) Surprisingly, she experienced no noticeable symptoms when she began eating gluten again, which we felt was a positive sign. However, 12 weeks in, her labs are positive again (ttg 4x the UL and ema positive again as well). Doc says that since she feels fine and her previous two biopsies showed nothing, she can just keep eating gluten and we could maybe biopsy again in two years. I was looking up the ema test and the probability of having not just one but two false positives, and it seems ridiculously low.  Any advice? Would you biopsy again? She’s old enough at this point that I really feel I need her buy-in to keep her gluten-free, and she feels that if the doc says it’s fine, then that’s the final word — which makes me inclined to biopsy again and hope that it actually shows damage this time (not because I want her to have celiac like her sisters, but because I kind of think she already does have it, and seeing the damage now would save her more severe damage in the long run that would come from just continuing to eat gluten for a few more years before testing again.)  Our doc is great - we really like him. But we are very confused and want to protect her. One of her older sibs stopped growing and has lots of teeth problems and all that jazz from not catching the celiac disease sooner, and we don’t want to get to that point with the younger sis. fwiw- she doesn’t mind the biopsy at all. It’s at a children’s hospital and she thinks it’s kind of fun. So it’s not like that would stress her out or anything.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.