Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Does Malabsorption+gluten-intolerance=celiac?


jshelton999

Recommended Posts

jshelton999 Apprentice

I had a strong positive result from Enterolab for gluten sensitivity: 124 (normal <10) and I've had confirmed malabsorption with very low Vit D, and problems with absorption of my thyroid med (Synthroid).

So does this mean that there was intestinal damage even if the doc didn't see anything more than gastritis in the biopsy? BTW - I have little confidence in my gastroenterologist and suspect he didn't really look for Celiac.

I've been telling my friends and family that what I have is probably Celiac rather than just gluten-intolerance because of the malabsorption issues and frankly, 'Celiac' is better understood term to them than 'gluten-intolerance'...

So what do you think? Might I have Celiac rather than just gluten-intolerance? Can you have these malabsorption issues without Celiac?

Thanks for your feedback...I'm really anxious to get this all sorted out!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Amyleigh0007 Enthusiast

Let me preface this by saying I am not a doctor..... Now, from my understanding, gluten intolerance doesn't produce villi damage and Celiac does (that's why biopsy is the gold standard for dxing Celiac). If you are having malabsorption issues I would think you have villi damage which means you have Celiac. If I am wrong, please, someone correct me.

Jestgar Rising Star

I think the answer is: it's not clear. And really, it doesn't matter, the treatment is the same. If you want, tell people that you caught your Celiac disease before it had done too much damage, but you were starting to have malabsorption problems.

jshelton999 Apprentice

Thanks for the quick replies! My instincts tell me there was intestinal damage and my doc just missed it. I didn't have a good feeling about him from day one. When I asked him before the endoscopy about looking for Celiac, he wouldn't discuss it, acting offended that I would suggest he look for it...

But if malabsorption can only occur when it's Celiac, then I definitely have Celiac.

BTW - One reason I need to have the exact condition dialed-in is that I'm on LTD and my insurance company needs a diagnostic code or they'll stop benefits. Ideally, I'll heal completely before too long and can go back to work - after 7yrs on disability!

rubyred Apprentice

FWIW, I used Enterolab and tested positive for malabsorption too. But, I was told by 2 doctors that I don't have celiac, even though my endoscopy showed mild blunting of villi. I think soy was causing the villi blunting?? Leaky gut?? I really don't know, never got any real answers. I also had gastritis and my stomach lining was atrophied. I've been gluten-free for a year now. Still don't know what to say to some people sometimes - do I have gluten sensitivity? Did I catch celiac early? I have the gene so I figure even if I don't have celiac, I still need to continue eating gluten-free. I can't really answer your question, but just wanted to share my experience.

CLeeB Rookie

Just like to chime in to say that I'm in the same boat with the same question. As you can read in my sig, my TtG test was within normal ranges, but i never had the full celiac panel done (stupid policy by HMO - only use the TtG test and then run the other ones if positive). But a comprehensive stool test (Metametrix) showed poor digestion and malabsorption, among other things. And Enterolab showed significantly high levels of anti-gliadin antibodies. Per naturopathic doc's orders, I've been gluten free for a little over a year.

I agree with Jestgar...it's unclear at this point. I just don't think science completely understands how gluten sensitivity/intolerance and celiac link/intereact/insert your favorite verb here. OTOH, I think it does matter for some of us what the label is. Yes, you are absolutely correct, the solution is the same. But dealing with the unknown is not something i think many human beings do very well. And there are a lot of unknowns when it comes to gluten.

FWIW, my naturopath, when i asked her to define my condition as best she could, said "severe gluten intolerance without test-proven villi damage."

Just proves how muddy the water really is.

Amyleigh0007 Enthusiast

My doctor admitted that he usually doesn't diagnose someone with Celiac unless their villi are completely smooth. Even with a positive blood test. I told him I thought that was dangerous because if someone has completely smooth villi that means they are in the critical stages of Celiac. I asked him why he wouldn't diagnose someone who had mild blunting. He said that's what he learned in med school 30 years ago. I told him times are different now. He said he knows and he is getting updated info from his daughter who is going through med school. So, I guess it all depends on your doctor and how long ago he/she went to med school!!!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Roses8721 posted a topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      0

      gluten-free Oatmeal

    2. - Roses8721 replied to Roses8721's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      7

      GI DX celiac despite neg serology and no biopsy

    3. - Scott Adams replied to Ginger38's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      5

      Shingles - Could It Be Related to Gluten/ Celiac

    4. - Scott Adams replied to Xravith's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      3

      Challenges eating gluten before biopsy

    5. - Ginger38 replied to Ginger38's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      5

      Shingles - Could It Be Related to Gluten/ Celiac


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,472
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    kygirlsusan
    Newest Member
    kygirlsusan
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):




  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Roses8721
      Had Quaker gluten-free oatmeal last night and my stomach is a mess today. NO flu but def stomach stuff. Anyone else?
    • Roses8721
      So you would be good with the diagnosis and not worry to check genetics etc etc? Appreciate your words!
    • Scott Adams
      As recommended by @Flash1970, you may want to get this: https://www.amazon.com/Curist-Lidocaine-Maximum-Strength-Topical/dp/B09DN7GR14/
    • Scott Adams
      For those who will likely remain gluten-free for life anyway due to well-known symptoms they have when eating gluten, my general advice is to ignore any doctors who push to go through a gluten challenge to get a formal diagnosis--and this is especially true for those who have severe symptoms when they eat gluten. It can take months, or even years to recover from such a challenge, so why do this if you already know that gluten is the culprit and you won't be eating it anyway?  Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If your symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet it would likely signal NCGS--but those in this group will usually have negative tests, or at best, elevated antibodies that don't reach the level of official positive. Unfortunately test results for celiac disease are not always definitive, and many errors can be made when doing an endoscopy for celiac disease, and they can happen in many ways, for example not collecting the samples in the right areas, not collecting enough samples, or not interpreting the results properly and giving a Marsh score.  Many biopsy results can also be borderline, where there may be certain damage that could be associated with celiac disease, but it just doesn't quite reach the level necessary to make a formal diagnosis. The same is true for blood test results. Over the last 10 years or so a new "Weak Positive" range has been created by many labs for antibody results, which can simply lead to confusion (some doctors apparently believe that this means the patient can decide if they want more testing or to go gluten-free). There is no "Weak Negative" category, for example. Many patients are not told to eat gluten daily, lots of it, for the 6-8 week period leading up to their blood test, nor asked whether or not they've been eating gluten. Some patients even report to their doctors that they've been gluten-free for weeks or months before their blood tests, yet their doctors incorrectly say nothing to them about how this can affect their test, and create false negative results. Many people are not routinely given a total IGA blood test when doing a blood screening, which can lead to false negative interpretations if the patient has low IGA. We've seen on this forum many times that some doctors who are not fully up on how interpret the blood test results can tell patients that the don't need to follow a gluten-free diet or get more testing because only 1 of the 2 or 3 tests done in their panel is positive (wrong!), and the other 1 or 2 tests are negative.  Dermatologists often don't know how to do a proper skin biopsy for dermatitis herpetiformis, and when they do it wrongly their patient will continue to suffer with terrible DH itching, and all the risks associated with celiac disease. For many, the DH rash is the only presentation of celiac disease. These patients may end up on strong prescriptions for life to control their itching which also may have many negative side effects, for example Dapsone. Unfortunately many people will continue to suffer needlessly and eat gluten due to these errors in performing or interpreting celiac disease tests, but luckily some will find out about non-celiac gluten sensitivity on their own and go gluten-free and recover from their symptoms. Consider yourself lucky if you've figured out that gluten is the source of your health issues, and you've gone gluten-free, because many people will never figure this out.    
    • Ginger38
      It has been the most terrible illness ever! Going on 3 weeks now… I had chicken pox as a kid… crazy how much havoc this dormant virus has caused after being reactivated! No idea what even caused it to fire back up. I’m scared this pain and sensitivity is just never going to improve or go away 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.