Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

How Long...?


wera9666

Recommended Posts

wera9666 Newbie

In May I was returning from a business trip in Bermuda (I know, pretty sweet) and noticed on the plane that my elbows had broken out with lots of what seemed like pimples. I work in lots of medical and research labs and figured that I just put my elbows in something nasty and was having a reaction. Well it didn't go away so I went to my general Dr and then to the derma Dr without any results. All the while the rash was popping up elsewhere; knees, belt buckle area, scalp, rear end, etc. Eventually my Dermatologist mentioned that it might be DH and did some sort of biopsy which came back negative. Then he said that we needed to do an immunofluorescence biopsy and blood tests but because he was showing zero sense of urgency I decided to skip the tests and just go gluten free and see what happens. I have been gluten free now for two weeks and while I think I have noticed improvement it is very little and I'm still getting new blisters. I'm a little frustrated because while I don't have a Dr diagnosis of DH my symptoms point strongly in that direction and I was hoping going gluten free cold turkey would prove this out. I'm interested to hear what other have experianced regarding detox time and what to expect.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



ChemistMama Contributor

Unfortunately, it's different for everyone. I"ve read on this board that some people see relief in several days, but for me when I went gluten-free, my DH got much worse before it got better. It took me several months to see any improvement, and then I just gave up and went on Dapsone to get relief. Do a search on this board for 'iodine patch test', you may want to try it to see if you do have DH. Good luck!

momxyz Contributor

two weeks may be a little early to see dramatic improvement. The fact that you're noticing some improvement is noteworthy; keep sticking with the diet!

For me the difference I noticed early on, was that a topical cream (I started out using 1% hydrocortisone) did help control the itching once I went gluten free. Prior to going gluten free creams and ointments provided very little relief. I also didn't instantly stop getting new blisters.

I did notice that I would get new blisters after an "itch attack" where I couldn't avoid scratching.

I followed the advice of another poster and stopped using the hydrocortisone after a while. This poster recommended Sarna lotion, whose active ingredient is pramoxamine. I used Gold Bond medicated cream, which has the same active ingredient. Either product might be helpful in controlling the itching and promote healing, while you continue on the gluten free diet.

I notice more improvement after a month of going gluten free. I'm at the 2 1/2 months point now and am very pleased with the healing. I still have spots that are not completely healed but almost all spots are brown now rather than angry red. It's been an exercise in patience.

Glamour Explorer

I am in your boat and have been gluten free for a short time (less than 2 weeks). My rash got better and then it has flared up again.

Before I was diagnosed by Derm and Eczema, Psoriasis, possible scabies, stress, the usual. I refused to do oral prednisone after researching.

The cortisone creams, prescription and weaker OTC really thinned my skin, causing easy bleeding, easy bruising and atrophy. Be careful. Even though applied to specific locations the cortisone absorbtion becomes system wide.

I have been off of all steroid creams for about 2 months and am keeping topicals down to shea butter or coconut oil.

I think using steroids ONLY if going gluten free is your best chance of them working at all. More important keep skin clean, watch out for irritants, perfumes, soaps, cleaners , laundry detergents and chemicals, in food, meds, etc.

I am just trying to get things back down to simple diet, etc. so I can figure out what is causing this.

First chemical and gluten free. Then I will nix dairy (do very little).

momxyz Contributor

I agree totally wih the non steroidal approach, accompanied with exquisite hygiene. But I found that I needed something to control the itchiness, to avoid further damage thru my scratching. And, scratching itself sometimes seemed to bring on new blisters. The preparations containing pramoxamine are non-steroidal and do effectively control itching. I was applying this twice a day for awhile, am now down to once a day and am feeling like I'm almost where I may not need it every day.

Glamour Explorer
I agree totally wih the non steroidal approach, accompanied with exquisite hygiene. But I found that I needed something to control the itchiness, to avoid further damage thru my scratching. And, scratching itself sometimes seemed to bring on new blisters. The preparations containing pramoxamine are non-steroidal and do effectively control itching. I was applying this twice a day for awhile, am now down to once a day and am feeling like I'm almost where I may not need it every day.

I tried those anti itch products, as well as SARNA, gold bond, zinc creams, anibiotics, as a matter of fact I have about 50 different products, lotions to deal with this.

I might try that pramoxine chemical again. I think I react to lanolin, petroleum and many common ingredients in topical products. Right now I find a bath soak with baking soda and then coconut oil (organic unrefined) is the best . Aloe vera, calendula were OK.

I did like .5% kroger sensitive skin cortizone, and now I can't find it. But I was still scratching and then with the thinned skin caused by steroids.

I have read that colloidal silver spray might help

I am convinced that since none of these preparations work, diet and body chemistry is the culprit

ang1e0251 Contributor

My healing from DH was slow but progressive. It took about 8 weeks for the lesions to clear up, a little longer for the discoloration. But, I didn't have the rash as long as you. Be patient, although with itching, patience is worn thin. Beware of trace gluten and sneaky gluten.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - trents replied to Roses8721's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      8

      GI DX celiac despite neg serology and no biopsy

    2. - Roses8721 posted a topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      0

      gluten-free Oatmeal

    3. - Roses8721 replied to Roses8721's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      8

      GI DX celiac despite neg serology and no biopsy

    4. - Scott Adams replied to Ginger38's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      5

      Shingles - Could It Be Related to Gluten/ Celiac

    5. - Scott Adams replied to Xravith's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      3

      Challenges eating gluten before biopsy


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,474
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Silk tha Shocker
    Newest Member
    Silk tha Shocker
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):




  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Certainly, it would b wise to have a gene test done if your physician is open to it as it would provide some more data to understand what's going on. But keep in mind that the genetic test for celiac disease cannot be used as to diagnose celiac disease, only to establish the potential to develop active celiac disease. About 40% of the general population possess one or both of the primary genes known to be associated with the development of active celiac disease but only about 1% of the population actually develop active celiac disease. So, the gene test is an effective "rule out" tool but not an effective diagnostic tool.
    • Roses8721
      Had Quaker gluten-free oatmeal last night and my stomach is a mess today. NO flu but def stomach stuff. Anyone else?
    • Roses8721
      So you would be good with the diagnosis and not worry to check genetics etc etc? Appreciate your words!
    • Scott Adams
      As recommended by @Flash1970, you may want to get this: https://www.amazon.com/Curist-Lidocaine-Maximum-Strength-Topical/dp/B09DN7GR14/
    • Scott Adams
      For those who will likely remain gluten-free for life anyway due to well-known symptoms they have when eating gluten, my general advice is to ignore any doctors who push to go through a gluten challenge to get a formal diagnosis--and this is especially true for those who have severe symptoms when they eat gluten. It can take months, or even years to recover from such a challenge, so why do this if you already know that gluten is the culprit and you won't be eating it anyway?  Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If your symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet it would likely signal NCGS--but those in this group will usually have negative tests, or at best, elevated antibodies that don't reach the level of official positive. Unfortunately test results for celiac disease are not always definitive, and many errors can be made when doing an endoscopy for celiac disease, and they can happen in many ways, for example not collecting the samples in the right areas, not collecting enough samples, or not interpreting the results properly and giving a Marsh score.  Many biopsy results can also be borderline, where there may be certain damage that could be associated with celiac disease, but it just doesn't quite reach the level necessary to make a formal diagnosis. The same is true for blood test results. Over the last 10 years or so a new "Weak Positive" range has been created by many labs for antibody results, which can simply lead to confusion (some doctors apparently believe that this means the patient can decide if they want more testing or to go gluten-free). There is no "Weak Negative" category, for example. Many patients are not told to eat gluten daily, lots of it, for the 6-8 week period leading up to their blood test, nor asked whether or not they've been eating gluten. Some patients even report to their doctors that they've been gluten-free for weeks or months before their blood tests, yet their doctors incorrectly say nothing to them about how this can affect their test, and create false negative results. Many people are not routinely given a total IGA blood test when doing a blood screening, which can lead to false negative interpretations if the patient has low IGA. We've seen on this forum many times that some doctors who are not fully up on how interpret the blood test results can tell patients that the don't need to follow a gluten-free diet or get more testing because only 1 of the 2 or 3 tests done in their panel is positive (wrong!), and the other 1 or 2 tests are negative.  Dermatologists often don't know how to do a proper skin biopsy for dermatitis herpetiformis, and when they do it wrongly their patient will continue to suffer with terrible DH itching, and all the risks associated with celiac disease. For many, the DH rash is the only presentation of celiac disease. These patients may end up on strong prescriptions for life to control their itching which also may have many negative side effects, for example Dapsone. Unfortunately many people will continue to suffer needlessly and eat gluten due to these errors in performing or interpreting celiac disease tests, but luckily some will find out about non-celiac gluten sensitivity on their own and go gluten-free and recover from their symptoms. Consider yourself lucky if you've figured out that gluten is the source of your health issues, and you've gone gluten-free, because many people will never figure this out.    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.