Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Reasons


countryfairy

Recommended Posts

countryfairy Newbie

A few years ago, I was diagnosed with celiac. I never really thought I had it. I now have a chance to prove myself right. This Thursday I have an appointment with my gastrointerologist, and I am going to suggest the test that is quite popular, from what I have heard. Apparently you go off the diet and eat whatever you want for six months, when you go back and get another endoscapy (sorry about spelling) to confirm the diagnosis. By the way, I am 14 and under parental domination. Well, I always try to be prepared. My father wants to try it, my mother does not. And my doctor may try to discourage it. So I want to know all the reasons for and against this procedure so, if necessary, I can talk my way into getting it done. So if any of you know anything about it (and aren't wondering about my mental health by now!) please tell me what I should be prepared for (both sides of it so I can come up with counterarguments). Thanks in advance,

Paige


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



countryfairy Newbie

Will no one reply? I only have till Thursday, and I have been searching the web all day...

KaitiUSA Enthusiast

Personally, I am against it. You were diagnosed...you have it...thats a fact. How were you diagnosed? There are some blood tests that are very specific for celiac and have very little false positive rates. Biopsies only confirm damage done...if a biopsy comes back negative that just means there is not damage done yet...that does not mean you do not have it.

I went through a denial stage where I thought I didn't have it and all and then I went and looked at my tests and so forth..I had to let it sink I guess.

You are very lucky that they caught this early because alot of doctors are not knowledgable in this...this disease is usually misdiagnosed and overlooked so the fact they found that speaks alot.

Cheating on this diet can literally knock years off of your life. It can cause cancer, osteoporosis, diabetes, liver/gallbladder/kidney/pancreas complications, nerve disorders , etc...it is very important..you really need to stay gluten free.

countryfairy Newbie

Well, thanks for answering. What you said makes a lot of sense. But I've had a blood test, and it said whether I'd had a regular intake of gluten for the past year (which I had, I know I'm not supposed to, but I did anyways), and it still came back negative. It's done that for the past two years, and I've only had it two years.

KaitiUSA Enthusiast

So how did they diagnose you? Did your blood tests ever come back positive. You have to stay on gluten heavily for at least 3 months before blood tests or biopsies.

countryfairy Newbie

No, they never said positive. What do you mean by heavily? I probably had 1-3 gluten products per day (bagels, pizza, breaded shrimp...). Naturally, I didn't have gluten evry day, but many times I'd have a few cupcakes, or graham crackers or something.

KaitiUSA Enthusiast

Did you have the symptoms or anything? Why did they suspect celiac? Why did they give you a diagnosis?

Being on gluten heavily is equivalent to about 2 pieces of bread a day but if you were on a regular diet before being tested then that would be good enough.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



countryfairy Newbie

No, no symptoms.

They said it was common among diabetics, especially in my age group.

Also, they apparently go by a number; a positive number indivates celiac, and most people are 4-6 I think. I was .05 or something.

And, yes, I probably had the equivalent of 2 pieces of bread a day.

KaitiUSA Enthusiast

-Anti-Gliadin (AGA) IgA

-Anti-Gliadin (AGA) IgG

-Anti-Endomysial (EMA) IgA

-Anti-Tissue Transglutaminase (tTG) IgA

-Total Serum IgA

The above tests are the tests you should have had done. Do you know what you tests you had done?

Some celiacs are IgA deficient so that can cause IgA levels to be down when they otherwise should have been positive.

Diabetics do sometimes have celiac but not all. Celiacs also do not have to have symptoms so that can make it hard to diagnose too.

plantime Contributor

If you already have a positive diagnosis from a doctor, there really is no reason to go for more tests to see if you have celiac. If you do go on the gluten for 3-6 months just for an endoscopy, it is my opinion (humble or vaunted!) that you are wasting money and your life/health/time.

For me to eat gluten, just a teenytiny amount, means two weeks of physical pain, depression, and psychosis. I cannot now imagine going through it for 3-6 months, just because I want a test result to be negative!

If you can find out what tests were used to get a diagnosis, we can let you know if we think the test was accurate or not.

celiac3270 Collaborator

I'm also strongly against gluten challenges. After a diagnosis, it serves no purpose to torture you for another six months just to tell you, again, that you have celiac disease. And the results don't lie.....

Just wanted to respond as I'm another person against the gluten challenge ;)

KaitiUSA Enthusiast

Yea..doctors had to have diagnosed you somehow...they just don't go around handing out a celiac diagnosis.

I am against is as I previously stated.

You really need to follow the diet ...as I understand you saying you are not...you need to be. Celiacs can have very serious life threatening complications if you do not follow it.

Peaches503 Newbie

Hi,

I also agree with celiac3270 and Kaiti. I don't think doing the gluten challenge is a good idea. A diagnosis is a diagnosis, whether you have symptoms or not. The gluten challenge is not worth the damage it could do to your body. Besides, being gluten-free is beneficial to anyone anyway. Good luck with all of this.

-Peaches

Emme999 Enthusiast

So anyway... I haven't had the biopsy yet but the tTG was positive (and some other test she did). However, I had an ELISA food allergy test about a month earlier that showed my allergic reaction to wheat was *low*. I wonder if it came back that way because I had been on a *really* low grain diet prior to the test. Hmm... it kind of ticks me off though that it didn't show up on a food allergy test! What the (*$#^&???

What is the point of the biopsy anyway? I mean, my doctor said the blood tests showed a 95-100% chance that I have celiac disease, so why do I have to have the biopsy at all? With the osteoporosis, dental problems, and digestive troubles I have when I eat grains - I don't really know why I should need *another* diagnosis.

Is it a good idea to find out how much damage has been done to your villi? Does the biopsy also detect cancer or something? I'm very confused, and kind of scared about going through the procedure. Kind of terrified actually. The whole "conscious sedation" thing still has the word "conscious" in it! Yikes!

celiac3270 Collaborator

Even on a full wheat diet, it wouldn't have shown up. celiac disease is an intolerance, not an allergy, so unless you ALSO have an allergy to wheat, it wouldn't show up on the allergy test.

KaitiUSA Enthusiast

Bean-

A biopsy just shows how much damage there is to the intestines(if any)

I would not think you would need a biopsy unless your doctor just wants to do one to see how much damage you have. I did not get a biopsy after positive bloodwork because the doctor felt I didn't need one.

Allergy testing is completely different and will not pick up on celiac...that has its own testing.

plantime Contributor
So anyway... I haven't had the biopsy yet but the tTG was positive (and some other test she did). However, I had an ELISA food allergy test about a month earlier that showed my allergic reaction to wheat was *low*. I wonder if it came back that way because I had been on a *really* low grain diet prior to the test. Hmm... it kind of ticks me off though that it didn't show up on a food allergy test! What the (*$#^&???

What is the point of the biopsy anyway? I mean, my doctor said the blood tests showed a 95-100% chance that I have celiac disease, so why do I have to have the biopsy at all? With the osteoporosis, dental problems, and digestive troubles I have when I eat grains - I don't really know why I should need *another* diagnosis.

Is it a good idea to find out how much damage has been done to your villi? Does the biopsy also detect cancer or something? I'm very confused, and kind of scared about going through the procedure. Kind of terrified actually. The whole "conscious sedation" thing still has the word "conscious" in it! Yikes!

Aaahh, Bean!! {{{hugs}}}!! The endoscopy and biopsy are not that bad at all. "Conscious Sedation" means that you are not put completely under, and do not require things like a respirator and something to keep your heart beating. I don't remember anything of mine after the throat spray until I woke up at home in my recliner. Perhaps the doctor wants to know how much damage you have, or if there is something else causing digestive problems for you. Ulcers and ulcerative colitis come to mind. Celiac will not show up at all on an allergy test. They are two distinctly different problems, with different tests required for diagnosis, but the same "cure"! :lol:

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - lizzie42 posted a topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      0

      Son's legs shaking

    2. - trents replied to Paulaannefthimiou's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      1

      Bob red mill gluten free oats

    3. - trents replied to jenniber's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      10

      Disaccharide deficient, confusing biopsy results, no blood test

    4. - Paulaannefthimiou posted a topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      1

      Bob red mill gluten free oats

    5. - jenniber replied to jenniber's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      10

      Disaccharide deficient, confusing biopsy results, no blood test

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,849
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Jadelucia
    Newest Member
    Jadelucia
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • lizzie42
      My 5yo was diagnosed with celiac last year by being tested after his sister was diagnosed. We are very strict on the gluten-free diet, but unsure what his reactions are as he was diagnosed without many symptoms other than low ferritin.  He had a school party where his teacher made gluten-free gingerbread men. I almost said no because she made it in her kitchen but I thought it would be ok.  Next day and for a few after his behavior is awful. Hitting, rude, disrespectful. Mainly he kept saying his legs were shaking. Is this a gluten exposure symptom that anyone else gets? Also the bad behavior? 
    • trents
      Not necessarily. The "Gluten Free" label means not more than 20ppm of gluten in the product which is often not enough for super sensitive celiacs. You would need to be looking for "Certified Gluten Free" (GFCO endorsed) which means no more than 10ppm of gluten. Having said that, "Gluten Free" doesn't mean that there will necessarily be more gluten than "Certified Gluten" in any given batch run. It just means there could be. 
    • trents
      I think it is wise to seek a second opinion from a GI doc and to go on a gluten free diet in the meantime. The GI doc may look at all the evidence, including the biopsy report, and conclude you don't need anything else to reach a dx of celiac disease and so, there would be no need for a gluten challenge. But if the GI doc does want to do more testing, you can worry about the gluten challenge at that time. But between now and the time of the appointment, if your symptoms improve on a gluten free diet, that is more evidence. Just keep in mind that if a gluten challenge is called for, the bare minimum challenge length is two weeks of the daily consumption of at least 10g of gluten, which is about the amount found in 4-6 slices of wheat bread. But, I would count on giving it four weeks to be sure.
    • Paulaannefthimiou
      Are Bobresmill gluten free oats ok for sensitive celiacs?
    • jenniber
      thank you both for the insights. i agree, im going to back off on dairy and try sucraid. thanks for the tip about protein powder, i will look for whey protein powder/drinks!   i don’t understand why my doctor refused to order it either. so i’ve decided i’m not going to her again, and i’m going to get a second opinion with a GI recommended to me by someone with celiac. unfortunately my first appointment isn’t until February 17th. do you think i should go gluten free now or wait until after i meet with the new doctor? i’m torn about what i should do, i dont know if she is going to want to repeat the endoscopy, and i know ill have to be eating gluten to have a positive biopsy. i could always do the gluten challenge on the other hand if she does want to repeat the biopsy.    thanks again, i appreciate the support here. i’ve learned a lot from these boards. i dont know anyone in real life with celiac.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.