Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Allergy Testing


SGWhiskers

Recommended Posts

SGWhiskers Collaborator

I'm CONFUSED! I need your collective knowledge and experiences.

5 years ago, tested positive through blood tests for tree, milk, and egg allergies

1.5 years ago, tested positive for celiac

Today, skin scratch test says trees, weeds, cat allergies. The allergist says if I don't have hives, swelling, difficulty breathing, I don't have milk/egg allergies. (But I could still have intolerances and definately have celiac).

So, which kind of testing is the trump card? Blood over skin, skin over blood, or blood and skin added together?

And then allergy shots were given as an option for 3-5 years. I don't even know where to begin thinking about that.

Please share knowledge, reputable resources, personal experiences about allergy testing and allergy treatment.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



missy'smom Collaborator

I went through some of the same feelings a year ago with kiddo and I when we were tested through a run of the mill allergist. By the grace of God, I came across a different allergist who has helped(and is helping) sort this all out alot. Old allergist didn't believe in dietary changes unless an anaphalactic reaction presented. New allergist is up on celiac disease, runs gene tests through Prometheus labs, does skin testing but with different protocol, runs comprehensive food panels and orders a form of elimination diet followed by reintroduction for those that show skin reaction. I think he would disagree with your allergist about the eggs and milk. The old allergist put everything on at once with skin testing. I passed out and they wiped it all off so we never knew what I reacted to. New allergist routinely puddles first, then pricks for those of concern, also starts with a few at a time or certain groups and waiting and watching before proceeding. Takes longer but is better. I highly recommend finding someone like this. Hope that gives you some direction and ideas for questions to ask. Kiddo has such a big environmental allergy load and strong reaction to some things that we have gone ahead with shots. We tried environmental control and nasal rinsing but it didn't make enough of a difference. Environmental control and nasal rinsing as well as being CF gives me alot of relief from nasal irritation(not enough but I'm still a work in progress)I trust our new allergist. We're on the same page so hopeful the shots will help kiddo. In the meantime, he is on meds as well. Poor kid said his food tastes so much better now! I had tests for milk last year-blood(egg-milk subfraction) and skin-neg. but this skin test this year was pos. for casein. I know I have problems with milk-just didn't know if it was an immune reaction for sure. I don't know if all skin tests are equal and I'm sure there are different blood tests for the foods.

SGWhiskers Collaborator

Thank you for sharing your experiences. I would love to hear from others. I don't like the hours that the allergist has for receiving shots, so I may be looking for someone else if I want to persue shots. I've eaten eggs twice now. I'm still reserving judgement on my reaction. Yum yum though. I hope your son is doing well with the shots. They don't sound like fun.

I really would love to hear from some other people about their expiences. I love getting multiple perspectives.

burdee Enthusiast

Skin tests only show how our skin reacts in contact with certain substances. Skin tests cannot diagnosed food allergies, because we do NOT put food under our skin when we eat. Only blood tests, which show whether our blood reacts to the presence of food proteins by producing antibodies, can diagnose food allergies. When we eat, we digest the food in our gastrointestinal system. Food allergies can be caused by IgE, IgG or IgA antibodies. The IgE antibodies usually cause immediate and sometimes life threatening reactions, like hives, swelling and difficulty breathing. Your second allergist may believe that all allergies are IgE or immediate reaction allergies. IgG and IgA mediated allergies are usually delayed, non-life threatening reactions to foods.

When I took the Enterolab tests for gluten intolerance, casein and soy allergy, I did a stool test, which looks for IgA antibodies to certain foods. That test diagnosed my dairy and soy allergies as well as gluten intolerance. Those test results matched my experience of excruciating intestinal cramps after eating any of those 3 foods.

2 years later I took the ELISA (enzyme linked immunosorbent assay) blood test for over 100 different foods. That blood test looked for IgG and IgE antibodies. The ELISA test diagnosed my egg and cane sugar allergies which matched my negative experiences with eggs and cane sugar. A year later (after I continued to have symptoms) I took the ELISA herb and spice test which diagnosed my allergies to vanilla and nutmeg. Those results also matched my experience of gastrointestinal pain after consuming those spices.

SUE

I'm CONFUSED! I need your collective knowledge and experiences.

5 years ago, tested positive through blood tests for tree, milk, and egg allergies

1.5 years ago, tested positive for celiac

Today, skin scratch test says trees, weeds, cat allergies. The allergist says if I don't have hives, swelling, difficulty breathing, I don't have milk/egg allergies. (But I could still have intolerances and definately have celiac).

So, which kind of testing is the trump card? Blood over skin, skin over blood, or blood and skin added together?

And then allergy shots were given as an option for 3-5 years. I don't even know where to begin thinking about that.

Please share knowledge, reputable resources, personal experiences about allergy testing and allergy treatment.

VioletBlue Contributor

I don't have any faith in allergy tests. The results can be open to interpretation. For me the best test is what happens when I eat something. If there's a negative reaction under different circumstances more than 3 times to any food I pay attention. My body doesn't react the exact same way to all foods, but I've gotten to know what a negative reaction feels like. I tend to think we're better off trusting and listening to our bodies than relying on tests.

missy'smom Collaborator

I have found the particular skin testing I had this time around to be very helpful. My allergist probably would agree that it's not the be all end all. It has given us some direction. He combines it with a dietary elimination/trial. After testing for around 80 out of 100 foods, I reacted to 26. Eliminated all of them and felt a great, unexpected improvement in digestion. My tummy felt absolutely nothing after meals! So calm. It was hard to get used to. Many people have noted that my color looks better, without knowing that I have made any changes. After keeping the reactors out for a good amount of time, we are re-introducing them one by one, one each week and noting what happens. I agree that we have to listen to and trust our bodies that's the bottom line but I'm also all for giving tests a try to give us direction so we don't have to figure everything out on our own all the time. I could never have figured out all those that I reacted to on my own and I may not have to keep all of them out but it may help me figure out which one or ones are the offenders and when I saw the list, I could see right away what was going on and it all made sense, so the overall picture wasn't just random, oddball results. All that being said, I have found it a challenge to nail down a DX for my issues with eggs(which I suspect) and dairy(which there's no question that I have, it's just a matter of why/what DX). I tried several types of tests for dairy and finally this recent skin test was the first one that was positive.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Aretaeus Cappadocia posted a topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      0

      Brown Rice Vinegar (organic) from Eden Foods is likely gluten free

    2. - Scott Adams replied to wellthatsfun's topic in Gluten-Free Recipes & Cooking Tips
      1

      heaps of hope!

    3. - Scott Adams replied to Jordan Carlson's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      2

      Fruits & Veggies

    4. - Scott Adams replied to yellowstone's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      1

      Cold/flu or gluten poisoning?

    5. - Scott Adams replied to hjayne19's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      1

      Celiac Screening

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,092
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Ffmedicbeaver
    Newest Member
    Ffmedicbeaver
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Aretaeus Cappadocia
      Traditional brown rice vinegars are made by fermenting brown rice and water with koji (Kōji 麹). The gluten risk comes from the method of preparing the koji: rice, wheat or barley may be used. Regardless of the starting grain, "koji" typically will be listed as an ingredient, and that term alone does not indicate gluten status. I called Eden Foods regarding their product "Organic Brown Rice Vinegar" (product of Japan) to ask how their product is made. They gave me a clear answer that they >do< use rice and they >do not< use wheat or barley in preparing their koji. FWIW, the product itself does not contain any labeling about gluten, gluten risk, or gluten safety. Based on Eden's statement, I am going to trust that this product is gluten safe and use it.
    • Scott Adams
      Your post nails the practical reality of living well with a celiac diagnosis. The shift from feeling restricted to discovering a new world of cooking—whether through a supportive partner making gluten-free spanakopita and gravy, or learning to cook for yourself—is exactly how many people find their footing. It turns a medical necessity into a chance to build kitchen skills, eat more whole foods, and actually enjoy the process. Your point that the basics—knife skills, food safety, and experimenting with spices—are all you really need is solid, helpful advice. It’s a good reminder that the diagnosis, while a pain, doesn’t have to stop you from eating well or having fun with food.
    • Scott Adams
      You are experiencing a remarkable recovery by addressing core nutrient deficiencies, yet you've uncovered a deeper, lifelong intolerance to fruits and vegetables that appears to be a distinct issue from celiac disease. Your experience points strongly toward a separate condition, likely Oral Allergy Syndrome (OAS) or a non-IgE food intolerance, such as salicylate or histamine intolerance. The instant burning, heart palpitations, and anxiety you describe are classic systemic reactions to food chemicals, not typical celiac reactions. It makes perfect sense that your body rejected these foods from birth; the gagging was likely a neurological reflex to a perceived toxin. Now that your gut has healed, you're feeling the inflammatory response internally instead. The path forward involves targeted elimination: try cooking fruits and vegetables (which often breaks down the problematic proteins/chemicals), focus on low-histamine and low-salicylate options (e.g., peeled pears, zucchini), and consider working with an allergist or dietitian specializing in food chemical intolerances. 
    • Scott Adams
      Your satiation is challenging and a common dilemma for those with celiac disease or non-celiac gluten sensitivity: distinguishing between a routine viral illness and a reaction to gluten exposure. The overlap in symptoms—fatigue, malaise, body aches, and general inflammation—makes it nearly impossible to tell them apart in the moment, especially with a hypersensitive system. This ambiguity is a significant source of anxiety. The key differentiator often lies in the symptom pattern and accompanying signs: gluten reactions frequently include distinct digestive upset (bloating, diarrhea), neurological symptoms like "brain fog," or a specific rash (dermatitis herpetiformis), and they persist without the respiratory symptoms (runny nose, sore throat) typical of a cold. Tracking your symptoms meticulously after any exposure and during illnesses can help identify your personal patterns. Ultimately, your experience underscores the reality that for a sensitive body, any immune stressor—be it gluten or a virus—can trigger a severe and similar inflammatory cascade, making vigilant management of your diet all the more critical. Have you had a blood panel done for celiac disease? This article might be helpful. It breaks down each type of test, and what a positive results means in terms of the probability that you might have celiac disease. One test that always needs to be done is the IgA Levels/Deficiency Test (often called "Total IGA") because some people are naturally IGA deficient, and if this is the case, then certain blood tests for celiac disease might be false-negative, and other types of tests need to be done to make an accurate diagnosis. The article includes the "Mayo Clinic Protocol," which is the best overall protocol for results to be ~98% accurate.    
    • Scott Adams
      Your situation highlights a difficult but critical crossroads in celiac diagnosis. While your positive blood test (a high TTG-IgA of 66.6) and dramatic improvement on a gluten-free diet strongly point to celiac disease, the gastroenterologist is following the formal protocol which requires an endoscopy/biopsy for official confirmation. This confirmation is important for your lifelong medical record, can rule out other issues, and is often needed for family screening eligibility. The conflicting advice from your doctors creates understandable anxiety. The challenge, of course, is the "gluten challenge"—reintroducing gluten for 4-6 weeks to make the biopsy accurate. Since your symptoms resolved, this will likely make you feel unwell again. You must weigh the short-term hardship against the long-term certainty of a concrete diagnosis. A key discussion to have with your GI doctor is whether, given your clear serology and clinical response, would be getting a diagnosis without the biopsy.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.