Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Allergy Testing


SGWhiskers

Recommended Posts

SGWhiskers Collaborator

I'm CONFUSED! I need your collective knowledge and experiences.

5 years ago, tested positive through blood tests for tree, milk, and egg allergies

1.5 years ago, tested positive for celiac

Today, skin scratch test says trees, weeds, cat allergies. The allergist says if I don't have hives, swelling, difficulty breathing, I don't have milk/egg allergies. (But I could still have intolerances and definately have celiac).

So, which kind of testing is the trump card? Blood over skin, skin over blood, or blood and skin added together?

And then allergy shots were given as an option for 3-5 years. I don't even know where to begin thinking about that.

Please share knowledge, reputable resources, personal experiences about allergy testing and allergy treatment.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



missy'smom Collaborator

I went through some of the same feelings a year ago with kiddo and I when we were tested through a run of the mill allergist. By the grace of God, I came across a different allergist who has helped(and is helping) sort this all out alot. Old allergist didn't believe in dietary changes unless an anaphalactic reaction presented. New allergist is up on celiac disease, runs gene tests through Prometheus labs, does skin testing but with different protocol, runs comprehensive food panels and orders a form of elimination diet followed by reintroduction for those that show skin reaction. I think he would disagree with your allergist about the eggs and milk. The old allergist put everything on at once with skin testing. I passed out and they wiped it all off so we never knew what I reacted to. New allergist routinely puddles first, then pricks for those of concern, also starts with a few at a time or certain groups and waiting and watching before proceeding. Takes longer but is better. I highly recommend finding someone like this. Hope that gives you some direction and ideas for questions to ask. Kiddo has such a big environmental allergy load and strong reaction to some things that we have gone ahead with shots. We tried environmental control and nasal rinsing but it didn't make enough of a difference. Environmental control and nasal rinsing as well as being CF gives me alot of relief from nasal irritation(not enough but I'm still a work in progress)I trust our new allergist. We're on the same page so hopeful the shots will help kiddo. In the meantime, he is on meds as well. Poor kid said his food tastes so much better now! I had tests for milk last year-blood(egg-milk subfraction) and skin-neg. but this skin test this year was pos. for casein. I know I have problems with milk-just didn't know if it was an immune reaction for sure. I don't know if all skin tests are equal and I'm sure there are different blood tests for the foods.

SGWhiskers Collaborator

Thank you for sharing your experiences. I would love to hear from others. I don't like the hours that the allergist has for receiving shots, so I may be looking for someone else if I want to persue shots. I've eaten eggs twice now. I'm still reserving judgement on my reaction. Yum yum though. I hope your son is doing well with the shots. They don't sound like fun.

I really would love to hear from some other people about their expiences. I love getting multiple perspectives.

burdee Enthusiast

Skin tests only show how our skin reacts in contact with certain substances. Skin tests cannot diagnosed food allergies, because we do NOT put food under our skin when we eat. Only blood tests, which show whether our blood reacts to the presence of food proteins by producing antibodies, can diagnose food allergies. When we eat, we digest the food in our gastrointestinal system. Food allergies can be caused by IgE, IgG or IgA antibodies. The IgE antibodies usually cause immediate and sometimes life threatening reactions, like hives, swelling and difficulty breathing. Your second allergist may believe that all allergies are IgE or immediate reaction allergies. IgG and IgA mediated allergies are usually delayed, non-life threatening reactions to foods.

When I took the Enterolab tests for gluten intolerance, casein and soy allergy, I did a stool test, which looks for IgA antibodies to certain foods. That test diagnosed my dairy and soy allergies as well as gluten intolerance. Those test results matched my experience of excruciating intestinal cramps after eating any of those 3 foods.

2 years later I took the ELISA (enzyme linked immunosorbent assay) blood test for over 100 different foods. That blood test looked for IgG and IgE antibodies. The ELISA test diagnosed my egg and cane sugar allergies which matched my negative experiences with eggs and cane sugar. A year later (after I continued to have symptoms) I took the ELISA herb and spice test which diagnosed my allergies to vanilla and nutmeg. Those results also matched my experience of gastrointestinal pain after consuming those spices.

SUE

I'm CONFUSED! I need your collective knowledge and experiences.

5 years ago, tested positive through blood tests for tree, milk, and egg allergies

1.5 years ago, tested positive for celiac

Today, skin scratch test says trees, weeds, cat allergies. The allergist says if I don't have hives, swelling, difficulty breathing, I don't have milk/egg allergies. (But I could still have intolerances and definately have celiac).

So, which kind of testing is the trump card? Blood over skin, skin over blood, or blood and skin added together?

And then allergy shots were given as an option for 3-5 years. I don't even know where to begin thinking about that.

Please share knowledge, reputable resources, personal experiences about allergy testing and allergy treatment.

VioletBlue Contributor

I don't have any faith in allergy tests. The results can be open to interpretation. For me the best test is what happens when I eat something. If there's a negative reaction under different circumstances more than 3 times to any food I pay attention. My body doesn't react the exact same way to all foods, but I've gotten to know what a negative reaction feels like. I tend to think we're better off trusting and listening to our bodies than relying on tests.

missy'smom Collaborator

I have found the particular skin testing I had this time around to be very helpful. My allergist probably would agree that it's not the be all end all. It has given us some direction. He combines it with a dietary elimination/trial. After testing for around 80 out of 100 foods, I reacted to 26. Eliminated all of them and felt a great, unexpected improvement in digestion. My tummy felt absolutely nothing after meals! So calm. It was hard to get used to. Many people have noted that my color looks better, without knowing that I have made any changes. After keeping the reactors out for a good amount of time, we are re-introducing them one by one, one each week and noting what happens. I agree that we have to listen to and trust our bodies that's the bottom line but I'm also all for giving tests a try to give us direction so we don't have to figure everything out on our own all the time. I could never have figured out all those that I reacted to on my own and I may not have to keep all of them out but it may help me figure out which one or ones are the offenders and when I saw the list, I could see right away what was going on and it all made sense, so the overall picture wasn't just random, oddball results. All that being said, I have found it a challenge to nail down a DX for my issues with eggs(which I suspect) and dairy(which there's no question that I have, it's just a matter of why/what DX). I tried several types of tests for dairy and finally this recent skin test was the first one that was positive.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - TheDHhurts posted a topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      0

      Prana Organics no longer GFCO-certified

    2. - cristiana replied to Dizzyma's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      2

      Newly diagnosed mam to coeliac 11 year old

    3. - trents replied to Dizzyma's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      2

      Newly diagnosed mam to coeliac 11 year old

    4. - Dizzyma posted a topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      2

      Newly diagnosed mam to coeliac 11 year old

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,924
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Jimlock
    Newest Member
    Jimlock
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • TheDHhurts
      I've been buying my seeds and nuts from Prana Organics for a number of years because the products have been GFCO-certified. I just got a new order delivered of their flax and sunflower seeds, and it turns out that they are no longer GFCO-certified. Instead, it just has a generic "Gluten Free" symbol on the package. I reached out to them to ask what protocols/standards/testing they have in place. The person that wrote back said that they are now certifying their gluten free status in-house, but that she couldn't answer my questions related to standards because the person with that info was on vacation. Not very impressed, especially since it still says on their website that they are GFCO-certified. Buyer beware!
    • cristiana
      Hi @Dizzyma I note what @trents has commented about you possibly posting from the UK.  Just to let you know that am a coeliac based in the UK, so if that is the case, do let me know if can help you with any questions on the NHS provision for coeliacs.    If you are indeed based in the UK, and coeliac disease is confirmed, I would thoroughly recommend you join Coeliac UK, as they provide a printed food and drink guide and also a phone app which you can take shopping with you so you can find out if a product is gluten free or not. But one thing I would like to say to you, no matter where you live, is you mention that your daughter is anxious.  I was always a bit of a nervous, anxious child but before my diagnosis in mid-life my anxiety levels were through the roof.   My anxiety got steadily better when I followed the gluten-free diet and vitamin and mineral deficiencies were addressed.  Anxiety is very common at diagnosis, you may well find that her anxiety will improve once your daughter follows a strict gluten-free diet. Cristiana 
    • trents
      Welcome to the celic.com community @Dizzyma! I'm assuming you are in the U.K. since you speak of your daughter's celiac disease blood tests as "her bloods".  Has her physician officially diagnosed her has having celiac disease on the results of her blood tests alone? Normally, if the ttg-iga blood test results are positive, a follow-up endoscopy with biopsy of the small bowel lining to check for damage would be ordered to confirm the results of "the bloods". However if the ttg-iga test score is 10x normal or greater, some physicians, particularly in the U.K., will dispense with the endoscopy/biopsy. If there is to be an endoscopy/biopsy, your daughter should not yet begin the gluten free diet as doing so would allow healing of the small bowel lining to commence which may result in a biopsy finding having results that conflict with the blood work. Do you know if an endoscopy/biopsy is planned? Celiac disease can have onset at any stage of life, from infancy to old age. It has a genetic base but the genes remain dormant until and unless triggered by some stress event. The stress event can be many things but it is often a viral infection. About 40% of the general population have the genetic potential to develop celiac disease but only about 1% actually develop celiac disease. So, for most, the genes remain dormant.  Celiac disease is by nature an autoimmune disorder. That is to say, gluten ingestion triggers an immune response that causes the body to attack its own tissues. In this case, the attack happens in he lining of the small bowel, at least classically, though we now know there are other body systems that can sometimes be affected. So, for a person with celiac disease, when they ingest gluten, the body sends attacking cells to battle the gluten which causes inflammation as the gluten is being absorbed into the cells that make up the lining of the small bowel. This causes damage to the cells and over time, wears them down. This lining is composed of billions of tiny finger-like projections and which creates a tremendous surface area for absorbing nutrients from the food we eat. This area of the intestinal track is where all of our nutrition is absorbed. As these finger-like projections get worn down by the constant inflammation from continued gluten consumption before diagnosis (or after diagnosis in the case of those who are noncompliant) the efficiency of nutrient absorption from what we eat can be drastically reduced. This is why iron deficiency anemia and other nutrient deficiency related medical problems are so common in the celiac population. So, to answer your question about the wisdom of allowing your daughter to consume gluten on a limited basis to retain some tolerance to it, that would not be a sound approach because it would prevent healing of the lining of her small bowel. It would keep the fires of inflammation smoldering. The only wise course is strict adherence to a gluten free diet, once all tests to confirm celiac disease are complete.
    • Dizzyma
      Hi all, I have so many questions and feel like google is giving me very different information. Hoping I may get some more definite answers here. ok, my daughter has been diagnosed as a coeliac as her bloods show anti TTG antibodies are over 128. We have started her  on a full gluten free diet. my concerns are that she wasn’t actually physically sick on her regular diet, she had tummy issues and skin sores. My fear is that she will build up a complete intolerance to gluten and become physically sick if she has gluten. Is there anything to be said for keeping a small bit of gluten in the diet to stop her from developing a total intolerance?  also, she would be an anxious type of person, is it possible that stress is the reason she has become coeliac? I read that diagnosis later in childhood could be following a sickness or stress. How can she have been fine for the first 10 years and then become coeliac? sorry, I’m just very confused and really want to do right by her. I know a coeliac and she has a terrible time after she gets gluttened so just want to make sure going down a total gluten free road is the right choice. thank you for any help or advise xx 
    • xxnonamexx
      very interesting thanks for the info  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.