Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Do Non Certified Oats Really Have Gluten?


sparkly

Recommended Posts

sparkly Newbie

I have a gluten free household, and the cost of Bob's Red Mill certified gluten-free oats is killing us. I wonder if their regular oats are really glutinous...I'd rather eat those because they're organic, and half the price of the non-organic gluten-free ones.

My thoughts:

They clean out their equipment between items, and throw out the first (30?) lbs.

I've been using their other products--say, cornmeal--for years (there didn't used to be a gluten-free cornmeal). How is corn different from regular oats? Both could have been grown with wheat, next door to wheat, etc. Both are made in the same factory.

I used to eat McCann's, after hearing from many that they are considered "safe".

Why isn't there a warning on BRM products like, say, cornmeal, saying that the corn may have been grown with soy, which is not uncommon, or that they are made in the same factory? Both corn and soy are major allergens, after all. (I don't think there's a warning). I feel skeptical, like they realize the gluten-free market is huge and a good money maker.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



psawyer Proficient

Wheat and oats are similar in many physical ways. The farmer will use the same harvesting equipment, transportation equipment, and so forth for oats as for wheat, and this continues all the way along the supply line. As a result, the oats are almost certain to be contaminated with wheat. The reverse is equally true: commercial wheat is contaminated with oats.

Corn, on the other hand, is harvested and processed very differently, and the equipment is not used for other crops.

JennyC Enthusiast

Bob's Red Mill gluten free oats are grown separate from wheat, processed by wheat-free equipment on the field, transported and stored separate from wheat, and processed in a separate factory. BRM goes through a lot of effort to ensure the gluten free status of their oats. Remember that oats do have some structural similarities with gluten grains, and an estimated ten percent of celiac patients react to gluten free oats. If you can tolerate oats, I think the extra cost is well worth it.

Korwyn Explorer

I have a gluten free household, and the cost of Bob's Red Mill certified gluten-free oats is killing us. I wonder if their regular oats are really glutinous...I'd rather eat those because they're organic, and half the price of the non-organic gluten-free ones.

My thoughts:

They clean out their equipment between items, and throw out the first (30?) lbs.

I've been using their other products--say, cornmeal--for years (there didn't used to be a gluten-free cornmeal). How is corn different from regular oats? Both could have been grown with wheat, next door to wheat, etc. Both are made in the same factory.

I used to eat McCann's, after hearing from many that they are considered "safe".

Why isn't there a warning on BRM products like, say, cornmeal, saying that the corn may have been grown with soy, which is not uncommon, or that they are made in the same factory? Both corn and soy are major allergens, after all. (I don't think there's a warning). I feel skeptical, like they realize the gluten-free market is huge and a good money maker.

Gluten is not an allergen (by FDA standards) first of all. So the fact that anyone bothers to label and concern themselves with cross-contamination is terrific. "Secondly, FDA regulations (21 CFR 101.100(a)(3)) exempt from ingredient declaration incidental additives, such as processing aids, that are present in a food at insignificant levels and that do not have a technical or functional effect in the finished food.". FDA Allergy warning letter from 2004. This portion of the requirements still stands, and 'cross-contamination' is not considered an allergen threat.

Many manufactureres ARE labelling potential cross-contamination sources ('Produced in a shared facility...', etc), but once again they are only applying the 'Top 8' allergen list.

Also, the gluten-free labelling which went into effect Jan 1, 2008 states, "In addition, a food made from

oats that bears a gluten-free claim in its labeling would be deemed misbranded if the claim suggests that all such foods are gluten-free or if 20 ppm or more gluten is present in the food." So for them to label oats gluten free they MUST be able to certify a presence of less than 20 ppm. Many oats which are not specifically grown as gluten-free oats do not meet this requirement.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,676
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    AW1851
    Newest Member
    AW1851
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Rejoicephd
      That and my nutritionist also said that drinking cider is one of the worst drink choices for me, given that I have candida overgrowth.  She said the combination of the alcohol and sugar would be very likely to worsen my candida problem.  She suggested that if I drink, I go for clear vodka, either neat or with a splash of cranberry.   So in summary, I am giving ciders a rest.  Whether it's a gluten risk or sugars and yeast overgrowth, its just not worth it.
    • Inkie
      Thank you for the information ill will definitely bring it into practice .
    • Scott Adams
      While plain, pure tea leaves (black, green, or white) are naturally gluten-free, the issue often lies not with the tea itself but with other ingredients or processing. Many flavored teas use barley malt or other gluten-containing grains as a flavoring agent, which would be clearly listed on the ingredient label. Cross-contamination is another possibility, either in the facility where the tea is processed or, surprisingly, from the tea bag material itself—some tea bags are sealed with a wheat-based glue. Furthermore, it's important to consider that your reaction could be to other substances in tea, such as high levels of tannins, which can be hard on the stomach, or to natural histamines or other compounds that can cause a non-celiac immune response. The best way to investigate is to carefully read labels for hidden ingredients, try switching to a certified gluten-free tea brand that uses whole leaf or pyramid-style bags, and see if the reaction persists.
    • Scott Adams
      This is a challenging and confusing situation. The combination of a positive EMA—which is a highly specific marker rarely yielding false positives—alongside strongly elevated TTG on two separate occasions, years apart, is profoundly suggestive of celiac disease, even in the absence of biopsy damage. This pattern strongly aligns with what is known as "potential celiac disease," where the immune system is clearly activated, but intestinal damage has not yet become visible under the microscope. Your concern about the long-term risk of continued gluten consumption is valid, especially given your family's experience with the consequences of delayed diagnosis. Since your daughter is now at an age where her buy-in is essential for a gluten-free lifestyle, obtaining a definitive answer is crucial for her long-term adherence and health. Given that she is asymptomatic yet serologically positive, a third biopsy now, after a proper 12-week challenge, offers the best chance to capture any microscopic damage that may have developed, providing the concrete evidence needed to justify the dietary change. This isn't about wanting her to have celiac; it's about wanting to prevent the insidious damage that can occur while waiting for symptoms to appear, and ultimately giving her the unambiguous "why" she needs to accept and commit to the necessary treatment. This article might be helpful. It breaks down each type of test, and what a positive results means in terms of the probability that you might have celiac disease. One test that always needs to be done is the IgA Levels/Deficiency Test (often called "Total IGA") because some people are naturally IGA deficient, and if this is the case, then certain blood tests for celiac disease might be false-negative, and other types of tests need to be done to make an accurate diagnosis. The article includes the "Mayo Clinic Protocol," which is the best overall protocol for results to be ~98% accurate.    
    • Scott Adams
      Welcome to the community! Generally, for a gluten challenge before celiac disease blood tests, Tylenol (acetaminophen) is considered safe and should not interfere with your antibody results. The medications you typically need to avoid are those like ibuprofen (Advil, Motrin) or naproxen (Aleve) that can cause intestinal irritation, which could potentially complicate the interpretation of an endoscopy if you were to have one. However, it is absolutely crucial that you confirm this with either your gastroenterologist or your surgeon before your procedure. They know the specifics of your case and can give you the definitive green light, ensuring your surgery is comfortable and your celiac testing remains accurate. Best of luck with your surgery tomorrow
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.