Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Need Help Prepping For Celiac Test


KatyE

Recommended Posts

KatyE Newbie

I've had trouble with intestinal problems of all sorts for a few years now. I had a friend a while back who suggested being tested for Celiac disease, but I didn't think it was necessary. However, I recently went on a low-carb diet, on which I cut out all starches completely. I've been on it for 3 weeks, but I take every other weekend off. Last weekend, I took a 2 day break from the diet. Saturday morning, I had toast, and for lunch, I had chicken noodle soup (homemade--the noodles were thick). Within a couple of hours, I started getting cramps, gas and horrid bloating. It went on all night (didn't help that I had pizza for dinner), and the next day. I went back on the diet Monday, but I called my doctor to ask if I could be tested. He got back with me today (Wednesday), and is mailing me the lab slips. So basically, I was off of gluten for one week, on for two days, off for two weeks, on for two days, off for two days, and today I ate some pasta for dinner.

I know I am supposed to be eating gluten before the test, but for how long, and how much? Should I just eat normally, or should I make sure that I have something with gluten each day until the test? Can I plan on taking the test in two weeks? More? Less? The nurse who called me didn't have any idea, and I am not sure that my doctor knows either.

Honestly, I don't think I have celiac disease, but I do think I have a gluten intolerance. However, since it can be so serious, I want to rule Celiac out.

Any guidance would be helpful. Thank you in advance.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Wolicki Enthusiast

I don't think anyone can say with certainty if your tests will be accurate or not. The "rule of thumb" is that you should be eating at least 3 slices of bread per day for 3 months for an accurate test.

For sure, try to get gluten every day until your test. But be ready, because you have been gluten light, it could affect the tests.

Panopticism Rookie

I am being tested tomorrow. I had been gluten free for 3 years prior to eating it now in preparation for the test. I made it about a week and a half with no symptoms other than a bit more gas than normal and a bit of bloating. After that week and a half mark, I took a turn for the worse. Started getting really sick, extremely watery diarrhea, brain fog, zone outs, black outs, joint pains, muscle fatigue, weight loss, generally feeling like I am slowly dying. I had such severe abdominal pain at work this evening that I was contemplating a trip to the ER. I decided that I was going to feel like poop anyway, so I might as well be at home where I feel most comfortable.

Not sure if my 16 days of gluten will be enough for an accurate blood test, but I honestly can't see myself making it another day of eating this way. There's no way I could keep eating it the entire time I'm waiting for results, and waiting for the biopsy pending a positive blood test. Wouldn't be possible, unless I had some oxy and a month off work.

Perhaps my symptoms are so severe because I was gluten free for 3 years?

melblondin Apprentice

Ugh! I'm in the same boat. I'm supposed to get bloodwork done, but I've been gluten-free for a week and a half now and I'm not sure if that's enough to affect the test or not, but I don't want to eat gluten again because I'm doing so well being off it. I think I'll just get the labs done and see, but I hate knowing the false negative is out there because then you're still just left wondering.

michelley65 Rookie

Ugh! I'm in the same boat. I'm supposed to get bloodwork done, but I've been gluten-free for a week and a half now and I'm not sure if that's enough to affect the test or not, but I don't want to eat gluten again because I'm doing so well being off it. I think I'll just get the labs done and see, but I hate knowing the false negative is out there because then you're still just left wondering.

I'm also waiting for my results...after being gluten free for about a week and a half..I had my blood test done and have a feeling that its going to be negative...but I feel better without gluten so who cares what the results are...I know what my body is telling me,and that is that gluten doesnt agree with me,so why eat it?

Panopticism Rookie

I'm also waiting for my results...after being gluten free for about a week and a half..I had my blood test done and have a feeling that its going to be negative...but I feel better without gluten so who cares what the results are...I know what my body is telling me,and that is that gluten doesnt agree with me,so why eat it?

I am the other way around. I had been gluten free already for 3 years. I had to start eating it to get the bloodwork. I started getting unbelievably sick after 10 days or so. Went to the doc on the 17th day, and she said that I hadn't been on it long enough to get an accurate result, I'd probably false neg. She said to go back to the gluten free diet immediately, because there was no way I would last long enough to get the results, wait for a biopsy appt., etc. I almost went to the emergency room the night before my doctor's appointment.

What's weird is that I was fine for the first 10 days of eating gluten. It was then that I took a steep drop. Got a bunch of sores in my mouth, severe abdominal pain, lost 8 pounds in 3 days, horrible diarrhea, total brain fog, no short term memory, mumbling, stuttering, inability to make eye contact, sleeping for 14 hours, sleeping through alarms for 6 hours. So on and so forth.

My doctor said I would have to get a diagnosis in the future, because it does matter whether you are or are not actually celiac. She said she likes to have her Celiac patients biopsied every couple of years because there is the chance of small bowel cancer. She said to consult the GI because you can usually get an accurate result from a biopsy after eating gluten for a much shorter period of time before the bloodtest would pick it up.

ravenwoodglass Mentor

I am the other way around. I had been gluten free already for 3 years. I had to start eating it to get the bloodwork. I started getting unbelievably sick after 10 days or so. Went to the doc on the 17th day, and she said that I hadn't been on it long enough to get an accurate result, I'd probably false neg. She said to go back to the gluten free diet immediately, because there was no way I would last long enough to get the results, wait for a biopsy appt., etc. I almost went to the emergency room the night before my doctor's appointment.

What's weird is that I was fine for the first 10 days of eating gluten. It was then that I took a steep drop. Got a bunch of sores in my mouth, severe abdominal pain, lost 8 pounds in 3 days, horrible diarrhea, total brain fog, no short term memory, mumbling, stuttering, inability to make eye contact, sleeping for 14 hours, sleeping through alarms for 6 hours. So on and so forth.

My doctor said I would have to get a diagnosis in the future, because it does matter whether you are or are not actually celiac. She said she likes to have her Celiac patients biopsied every couple of years because there is the chance of small bowel cancer. She said to consult the GI because you can usually get an accurate result from a biopsy after eating gluten for a much shorter period of time before the bloodtest would pick it up.

It is not unusual for the reaction to be delayed. As my allergist explained it can take some time for the antibodies to build up enough to cause the reaction. As to whether you need a doctor derived diagnosis I have to disagree with your doctor and her habit of rescoping every two years indefinately for folks with celiac. According to the NIH after 5 years gluten-free our chances of developing cancer related to celiac go down to the same as folks without. I hope and pray that someday the doctors in the US start to use the mucosal challenge instead of the dietary challenge. It is very accurate and avoids us having to be poisoned for months for diagnosis. Even on a full gluten diet some of us still have a false negative biopsy so that is no more conclusive than the blood tests. The best test is your response to the diet. If that is good I personally would not let the doctors talk you into a lengthy challenge.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,208
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Gail Brown
    Newest Member
    Gail Brown
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      NCGS does not cause damage to the small bowel villi so, if indeed you were not skimping on gluten when you had the antibody blood testing done, it is likely you have celiac disease.
    • Scott Adams
      I will assume you did the gluten challenge properly and were eating a lot of gluten daily for 6-8 weeks before your test, but if not, that could be the issue. You can still have celiac disease with negative blood test results, although it's not as common:  Clinical and genetic profile of patients with seronegative coeliac disease: the natural history and response to gluten-free diet: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5606118/  Seronegative Celiac Disease - A Challenging Case: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9441776/  Enteropathies with villous atrophy but negative coeliac serology in adults: current issues: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34764141/  Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If your symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet it would likely signal NCGS.
    • Xravith
      I'm very confused... My blood test came out negative, I checked all antibodies. I suppose my Total IgA levels are normal (132 mg/dl), so the test should be reliable. Still, I'm not relieved as I can't tolerate even a single biscuit. I need to talk to my doctor about whether a duodenal biopsy is necessary. But it is really possible to have intestinal damage despite having a seronegative results? I have really strong symptoms, and I don't want to keep skipping university lectures or being bedridden at home.
    • Scott Adams
      They may want to also eliminate other possible causes for your symptoms/issues and are doing additional tests.  Here is info about blood tests for celiac disease--if positive an endoscopy where biopsies of your intestinal villi are taken to confirm is the typical follow up.    
    • Scott Adams
      In the Europe the new protocol for making a celiac disease diagnosis in children is if their tTg-IgA (tissue transglutaminase IgA) levels are 10 times or above the positive level for celiac disease--and you are above that level. According to the latest research, if the blood test results are at certain high levels that range between 5-10 times the reference range for a positive celiac disease diagnosis, it may not be necessary to confirm the results using an endoscopy/biopsy: Blood Test Alone Can Diagnose Celiac Disease in Most Children and Adults TGA-IgA at or Above Five Times Normal Limit in Kids Indicates Celiac Disease in Nearly All Cases No More Biopsies to Diagnose Celiac Disease in Children! May I ask why you've had so many past tTg-IgA tests done, and many of them seem to have been done 3 times during short time intervals?    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.