Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

How Strictly Do You Avoid Your Igg Reaction Foods?


Chakra2

Recommended Posts

Chakra2 Contributor

I got IgG food allergy tests done by a holistic MD a few months ago. The results were divided into categories by severity. Category 1 = very mild reaction, 2 = mild, 3= moderate, 4= severe. The doc said to never eat the severe foods ever again, to avoid the moderates for 9 months, milds for 6 months, and very milds for 3 months.

I'm okay with his advice for the most part but my son's pediatrician (son got tested too) and my chiropractor/nutritionist both said they didn't believe in the IgG testing. I wasn't surprised that the pediatrician thought that, but the nutritionist is super alternative so I was surprised that even she thought I wouldn't really benefit from following that schedule. She said the test was a useful, concrete image of just how leaky my gut is but that she doesn't necessarily think that it accurately measures a specific response to individual foods.

So I was wondering if others who have done IgG testing have really followed a schedule like the one above? With what kind of result?

I only have 4 "never agains" and I'm fine avoiding those (even my mainstream primary care doc said to avoid the nevers) but one of the foods I'm supposed to avoid for nine months is rice -- easier said than done while I'm learning gluten-free/soy-free/dairy-free. My nutritionist said it just doesn't make sense to think that a person couldn't really tolerate rice for 9 months. She asked if I feel like I react badly to it but I honestly feel a little confused about some of my reactions still -- I've only been gluten free since January, and fully dairy and soy free since about April.

Chakra2


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Jestgar Rising Star

Those tests are very inaccurate. You really need to test each specific food by first eliminating it for several weeks, then adding it back. Keep a journal and write down everything you feel while you are doing this. Note both physical and emotional/mental things (...."I seem to not get angry as much"....).

If any of the foods on your 'reactive' list have no response in your body, then eat them whenever you want.

burdee Enthusiast

I got IgG food allergy tests done by a holistic MD a few months ago. The results were divided into categories by severity. Category 1 = very mild reaction, 2 = mild, 3= moderate, 4= severe. The doc said to never eat the severe foods ever again, to avoid the moderates for 9 months, milds for 6 months, and very milds for 3 months.

I'm okay with his advice for the most part but my son's pediatrician (son got tested too) and my chiropractor/nutritionist both said they didn't believe in the IgG testing. I wasn't surprised that the pediatrician thought that, but the nutritionist is super alternative so I was surprised that even she thought I wouldn't really benefit from following that schedule. She said the test was a useful, concrete image of just how leaky my gut is but that she doesn't necessarily think that it accurately measures a specific response to individual foods.

So I was wondering if others who have done IgG testing have really followed a schedule like the one above? With what kind of result?

I only have 4 "never agains" and I'm fine avoiding those (even my mainstream primary care doc said to avoid the nevers) but one of the foods I'm supposed to avoid for nine months is rice -- easier said than done while I'm learning gluten-free/soy-free/dairy-free. My nutritionist said it just doesn't make sense to think that a person couldn't really tolerate rice for 9 months. She asked if I feel like I react badly to it but I honestly feel a little confused about some of my reactions still -- I've only been gluten free since January, and fully dairy and soy free since about April.

Chakra2

My IgG mediated allergies were diagnosed by ELISA blood test. My doc told me to just disregard the 'low' reaction and heed the 'moderate to high' reaction results. Every one of the foods (eggs, nutmeg, vanilla and cane sugar) in that latter category cause me painful gastrointestinal symptoms, except cane sugar, which causes 2-3 days of tachycardia and nausea. I absolutely avoid those foods, because I get obvious and uncomfortable reaction symptoms, which get even more intense after abstaining from those for long periods. So I will never be able to return to eating them, because my body won't forget how to make antibodies to those foods.

I also was diagnosed with IgA mediated allergies (intolerances?) to gluten, casein and soy. All those foods cause intense painful gastro symptoms. So I will never purposely consume any of those foods.

SUE

Skylark Collaborator

Your nutritionist is absolutely correct. The schedule is really silly.

The use for IgG tests is as a guide, not to absolutely identify foods you can't ever eat. There really is no accurate test for food allergies and intolerances other than an elimination diet, but the IgG tests are supposedly helpful in narrowing down what might cause issues. Talk to your nutritionist (she sounds smart!) about how to set up an elimination diet to see whether you are sensitive to the foods with medium to high results.

Remember that as your body heals, you may come to tolerate some of your IgG foods again. If a food is fully, correctly digested in the intestine, it doesn't make it to the bloodstream to interact with IgG.

Juliebove Rising Star

I've had two IGg tests done and so has my daughter. The results did not have things like mild or severe. We avoid all food that show an allergy all together. The Dr. said my egg was the highest one he had ever seen. And I did have severe reactions to eggs. I only knew this because daughter had previously been diagnosed with an egg allergy. So I quit buying them.

Then I got some egg salad from the salad bar for myself. Got sick something like 16 hours later. Did not make the connection to the egg, so ate the rest of it. This time the reaction was a half an hour later.

Some months went by. Had bought eggs for my husband. He didn't eat them. So I boiled them and made egg salad. Ate it twice. Same exact reaction. So... Suddenly a light bulb went off in my head! All those times I had gotten sick in the past and didn't know why. Eggs! Because of the delayed reaction, it made it hard to see. But I will never eat an egg again.

Daughter has since outgrown the egg, dairy, soy and banana allergies. But the egg was close to the line. So the Dr. told her to eat no more than once a week, avoidance would really be the best. The rest could be eaten no more than twice weekly and not on subsequent days.

We still avoid soy at least in the form of soybeans and soy protein because it messes with my thyroid. We do figure we will get soybean oil in restaurants. And we do eat some soy lecithin.

I outgrew the dairy but the Dr. told me to avoid it. I did this for a while. But I really wanted it. So, like my daughter, I started eating it twice a week. But I am not so sure this is a good idea. Sometimes I get sick to my stomach. I do have other medical digestion issues. So I just don't know...

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - trents replied to Roses8721's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      8

      GI DX celiac despite neg serology and no biopsy

    2. - Roses8721 posted a topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      0

      gluten-free Oatmeal

    3. - Roses8721 replied to Roses8721's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      8

      GI DX celiac despite neg serology and no biopsy

    4. - Scott Adams replied to Ginger38's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      5

      Shingles - Could It Be Related to Gluten/ Celiac

    5. - Scott Adams replied to Xravith's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      3

      Challenges eating gluten before biopsy


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,474
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Silk tha Shocker
    Newest Member
    Silk tha Shocker
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):




  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Certainly, it would b wise to have a gene test done if your physician is open to it as it would provide some more data to understand what's going on. But keep in mind that the genetic test for celiac disease cannot be used as to diagnose celiac disease, only to establish the potential to develop active celiac disease. About 40% of the general population possess one or both of the primary genes known to be associated with the development of active celiac disease but only about 1% of the population actually develop active celiac disease. So, the gene test is an effective "rule out" tool but not an effective diagnostic tool.
    • Roses8721
      Had Quaker gluten-free oatmeal last night and my stomach is a mess today. NO flu but def stomach stuff. Anyone else?
    • Roses8721
      So you would be good with the diagnosis and not worry to check genetics etc etc? Appreciate your words!
    • Scott Adams
      As recommended by @Flash1970, you may want to get this: https://www.amazon.com/Curist-Lidocaine-Maximum-Strength-Topical/dp/B09DN7GR14/
    • Scott Adams
      For those who will likely remain gluten-free for life anyway due to well-known symptoms they have when eating gluten, my general advice is to ignore any doctors who push to go through a gluten challenge to get a formal diagnosis--and this is especially true for those who have severe symptoms when they eat gluten. It can take months, or even years to recover from such a challenge, so why do this if you already know that gluten is the culprit and you won't be eating it anyway?  Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If your symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet it would likely signal NCGS--but those in this group will usually have negative tests, or at best, elevated antibodies that don't reach the level of official positive. Unfortunately test results for celiac disease are not always definitive, and many errors can be made when doing an endoscopy for celiac disease, and they can happen in many ways, for example not collecting the samples in the right areas, not collecting enough samples, or not interpreting the results properly and giving a Marsh score.  Many biopsy results can also be borderline, where there may be certain damage that could be associated with celiac disease, but it just doesn't quite reach the level necessary to make a formal diagnosis. The same is true for blood test results. Over the last 10 years or so a new "Weak Positive" range has been created by many labs for antibody results, which can simply lead to confusion (some doctors apparently believe that this means the patient can decide if they want more testing or to go gluten-free). There is no "Weak Negative" category, for example. Many patients are not told to eat gluten daily, lots of it, for the 6-8 week period leading up to their blood test, nor asked whether or not they've been eating gluten. Some patients even report to their doctors that they've been gluten-free for weeks or months before their blood tests, yet their doctors incorrectly say nothing to them about how this can affect their test, and create false negative results. Many people are not routinely given a total IGA blood test when doing a blood screening, which can lead to false negative interpretations if the patient has low IGA. We've seen on this forum many times that some doctors who are not fully up on how interpret the blood test results can tell patients that the don't need to follow a gluten-free diet or get more testing because only 1 of the 2 or 3 tests done in their panel is positive (wrong!), and the other 1 or 2 tests are negative.  Dermatologists often don't know how to do a proper skin biopsy for dermatitis herpetiformis, and when they do it wrongly their patient will continue to suffer with terrible DH itching, and all the risks associated with celiac disease. For many, the DH rash is the only presentation of celiac disease. These patients may end up on strong prescriptions for life to control their itching which also may have many negative side effects, for example Dapsone. Unfortunately many people will continue to suffer needlessly and eat gluten due to these errors in performing or interpreting celiac disease tests, but luckily some will find out about non-celiac gluten sensitivity on their own and go gluten-free and recover from their symptoms. Consider yourself lucky if you've figured out that gluten is the source of your health issues, and you've gone gluten-free, because many people will never figure this out.    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.