Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Anybody Opt Out Of Biopsy?


danaf617

Recommended Posts

danaf617 Explorer

To make a long story short, I've been sick daily for 7 months. GI says post-infectious IBS. Celiac panel negative, colonoscopy looked good. Enterolab test shows positive for antibodies. When I brought it to the GI, he suggested we do the endoscopy before I go gluten-free. I agreed, but I'm still 3 weeks out from my appointment for the biopsy and I'm increasingly miserable and I just want to feel better NOW. I'm thinking of canceling the procedure and just doing the strict trial gluten-free diet. Does it really matter if I get the biopsy? As someone pointed out (Skylark, I think) my chance for Celiac look pretty low according to my Enterolab results (only positive for antibodies and double copy of gene for gluten sensitivity, not carrying either major celiac-associated gene.)

My husband has asked me about it and says "If you are going to try gluten-free either way, why even put yourself through another test?"

Gluten intolerant, gluten sensitive, celiac... all of it means gluten free for life, right? At this point I don't care what I or anybody else calls it. I just want to try and see if cutting out the gluten makes me feel better. I am so sick of being so sick. :( I'm crying just typing it because I have felt miserable for so long now and it's just worn me down.

Am I foolish for not just waiting and getting the biopsy?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



RiceGuy Collaborator

It is not foolish to skip the biopsy and go gluten-free now, if that's what you want to do. As long as you are sure that you won't start second-guessing your decision later on. I and others haven't had any tests at all. Going gluten-free made a world of difference, and I don't care what any tests might say. But that's me. Not everyone feels they can stick to the diet 100% without an "official" diagnosis. It is really up to you.

I suppose you could try a day or two gluten-free, just to see if you notice anything. Some people get partial relief that soon, but generally, more time is required. A full recovery is also not expected that soon, since the antibodies can hang around for up to two weeks or so after the last exposure to gluten, and the intestines don't heal overnight. However, once you start feeling better, you may not want to touch gluten ever again, and the biopsy might become out of reach no matter how much you may later decide you'd like to have it.

Skylark Collaborator

I'm not formally diagnosed. I didn't even want to go back to eating gluten for the blood panel.

RiceGuy said it beautifully. If you're not worried about second-guessing yourself if the diet works, there is really no need for the biopsy. Other GI problems can be picked up whether or not you're on the gluten-free diet, so you're not risking missing a different diagnosis.

IngridBeth Apprentice

I am very new to this - gluten free for six days and awaiting blood test results - but I will NOT eat gluten again for a biopsy. My body does not like gluten - whether it's a sensitivity, allergy, Celiac, etc., I do not know and while it would be nice to have an answer, you could not pay me to go back to gluten. So, I certainly understand and don't think it's foolish! Again I'm very new to this but it's reassuring to know you are not alone!

danaf617 Explorer

Thank you for your replies. :)

I'm not worried about cheating on the diet if I do it and symptoms resolve. If I can feel like my normal self again, I'll never touch gluten as long as I live. These last 7 months have been horrible. I can count on one hand the number of days that I wasn't in pain. My life has almost stopped, I lay around and barely leave the house. Luckily, I don't work cause I can't imagine having to perform a job like this. I stay at home with my 2 small kids and I just feel so badly that most of our activities have stopped because Mommy doesn't feel good every day. :(

I guess I will take the rest of today and think about it. I'm leaning towards not doing the biopsy though.

GlutenFreeManna Rising Star

I did not have any testing--I self diagnosed with the diet. One reason why you may want to get it is if you think you will need positive test results to convince family members to take you seriously. Can you call the doctor that is supposed to do your endoscopy and ask to get put on a waiting list for any cancelations? Perhaps they can get you in sooner.

larry mac Enthusiast

I can only speak for myself, but I'm absolutely certain that if I had not been positively diagnosed via endoscopy and biopsies, that I would cheat on the diet.

And why wouldn't I? First off, it wouldn't be cheating, because I would not be on a strict gluten-free diet if all I had was a gluten intolerance. There would be no long term damage to my small intestine. No worry about developing cancer, or the inability to absorb nutrients, and all the repercussions that causes. A gluten intolerance does not require a strict gluten-free diet for life. It is not an auto-immune disease. It may only require say a 90% gluten-free diet, or something similar.

There is simply no way I would adhere to a strict gluten free diet for life unless I had been absolutely diagnosed with Celiac Disease.

best regards, lm


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



danaf617 Explorer

I canceled it.

I am just really, really eager to try and see if I'll feel better gluten-free. If I do, I'm 100% okay calling myself gluten intolerant and avoiding the stuff like the plague.

And maybe it's luck or the fact that my husband and I speak up if needed, but our family rarely gives us problems with anything. Nobody can force me to eat or not eat something and if they want to argue with me, it will fall on deaf ears. And the last thing anyone would do is intentionally try to gluten me like I read on here :o (which is CRAZY, btw. who does that?) because they run the risk of not having us in their lives anymore. My husband is black & white with things, there are never shades of gray. He just wouldn't deal with someone in his family trying to harm me. (My family lives 1,800 mi away and I know they wouldn't argue with me or question me.)

Thanks again for your replies! :)

Skylark Collaborator

Good luck! I really hope the diet works and you start feeling better.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,208
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Gail Brown
    Newest Member
    Gail Brown
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      NCGS does not cause damage to the small bowel villi so, if indeed you were not skimping on gluten when you had the antibody blood testing done, it is likely you have celiac disease.
    • Scott Adams
      I will assume you did the gluten challenge properly and were eating a lot of gluten daily for 6-8 weeks before your test, but if not, that could be the issue. You can still have celiac disease with negative blood test results, although it's not as common:  Clinical and genetic profile of patients with seronegative coeliac disease: the natural history and response to gluten-free diet: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5606118/  Seronegative Celiac Disease - A Challenging Case: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9441776/  Enteropathies with villous atrophy but negative coeliac serology in adults: current issues: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34764141/  Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If your symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet it would likely signal NCGS.
    • Xravith
      I'm very confused... My blood test came out negative, I checked all antibodies. I suppose my Total IgA levels are normal (132 mg/dl), so the test should be reliable. Still, I'm not relieved as I can't tolerate even a single biscuit. I need to talk to my doctor about whether a duodenal biopsy is necessary. But it is really possible to have intestinal damage despite having a seronegative results? I have really strong symptoms, and I don't want to keep skipping university lectures or being bedridden at home.
    • Scott Adams
      They may want to also eliminate other possible causes for your symptoms/issues and are doing additional tests.  Here is info about blood tests for celiac disease--if positive an endoscopy where biopsies of your intestinal villi are taken to confirm is the typical follow up.    
    • Scott Adams
      In the Europe the new protocol for making a celiac disease diagnosis in children is if their tTg-IgA (tissue transglutaminase IgA) levels are 10 times or above the positive level for celiac disease--and you are above that level. According to the latest research, if the blood test results are at certain high levels that range between 5-10 times the reference range for a positive celiac disease diagnosis, it may not be necessary to confirm the results using an endoscopy/biopsy: Blood Test Alone Can Diagnose Celiac Disease in Most Children and Adults TGA-IgA at or Above Five Times Normal Limit in Kids Indicates Celiac Disease in Nearly All Cases No More Biopsies to Diagnose Celiac Disease in Children! May I ask why you've had so many past tTg-IgA tests done, and many of them seem to have been done 3 times during short time intervals?    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.