Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Biopsy After 3 Months Gluten Free?


Sarah1122

Recommended Posts

Sarah1122 Newbie

Hi all,

I am new to this site (and to Celiac in general) and first have to thank you all for the wonderful information and support I have found here. It really helps me feel not "so alone" during this difficult time.

On to my question: My blood work tested positive for Celiac in March - My GI wanted to do a biopsy to confirm, but my insurance company requries I pay a $500 deductable, which I could not afford at the time. My mom and sister both have celiac and now that I have been gluten free (mostly - there were a few accidents in the beginning) since April, I have no doubt that I have Celiac Disease.

However, in all my research, I found that the biopsy is the "gold standard" at confirming Celiac and have decided to have the test, both to rule out and/ or address other issues I am still having and to make it "official" in my medical record. I feel as though a specialist down the road may not take me seriously if I dont have the biopsy...

My question is - should I start to eat gluten again, as my test is in 2 weeks? I really do not want to - I am just finally starting to feel the slightest bit better and the thought of essentially poisoning myself for this test is upsetting. By the time I have the test, I will have been follow a gluten-free diet for 15 weeks, though I have been glutened a few times accidentally and gotten very sick (brain fog and depression are the worst!)

Will these gluten free weeks completely throw off the results? Or has this amount of time not allowed things to heal yet? (I was undiagnosed for almost 10 years, so I am thinking there must still be some damage there, right??)

What do you think? What has your experience been?

Any input is appreciated! Thank you!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Skylark Collaborator

Hi there and welcome.

All bets are off if you're gluten-free for that long before your biopsy. Eating gluten for two weeks after three months gluten-free is not likely to make a difference. I also completely agree about not poisoning yourself if your gluten symptoms are really bad.

With two first-degree relatives who are celiac and positive bloodwork I can't imagine a specialist wouldn't take you seriously. Did you come up positive for anti-endomysial? There are researchers saying people with anti-EMA maybe don't even need a biopsy because it's so specific for celiac disease.

ravenwoodglass Mentor

You have 2 first degree relatives with celiac and you have positive blood work. I would consider myself diagnosed if I were you. You would need to be back on gluten for about 3 months for the best chance at a positive biopsy and even then your results could be a false negative. You may also become even sicker from the challenge than you were before your blood tests and it could take longer for you to heal. IMHO you should simply skip the biopsy and save your money and health.

tarnalberry Community Regular

Ditto what everyone said - you need to be eating gluten at least three months prior to testing for a realistic expectation not to get a false positive.

Tina B Apprentice

Hi there and welcome.

All bets are off if you're gluten-free for that long before your biopsy. Eating gluten for two weeks after three months gluten-free is not likely to make a difference. I also completely agree about not poisoning yourself if your gluten symptoms are really bad.

With two first-degree relatives who are celiac and positive bloodwork I can't imagine a specialist wouldn't take you seriously. Did you come up positive for anti-endomysial? There are researchers saying people with anti-EMA maybe don't even need a biopsy because it's so specific for celiac disease.

I would just stick with the diet and forget the biopsy. What would it tell you that you don't already know. Of course the doc wants you to do it. he gets paid for it. You already know the bloodwork is positive and you have positive family members. By yourself a nice gift with the $500

Sarah1122 Newbie

Thank you all for your responses - and for confirming my feelings about starting to eat gluten now after so long without it. I just dont even think I could do it if I had to! Ugh! As much as I loved pizza before my diagnosis, if I was told I had to eat a slice right now, I would probably cry (or gag!) the whole way through it!

I am having a full physical tomorrow, running a bunch of tests to determine vitamin levels, anti-bodies, hormones, bone-density, and such, just to see where my health is right now. (many tests I learned about on this site, so again - thank you very much!) Going undiagnosed for about 12 years scares me... thinking of all the damage that could have been done. Doctors kept telling me I was "stressed" or "too young to be this tired, that it would pass." (I am 34 now) No one would listen! I had ultrasounds on my uterus because they thought the swelling was a tumor

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,200
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Elisa Stutsman
    Newest Member
    Elisa Stutsman
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):




  • Who's Online (See full list)


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Redanafs
      Hi everyone. Back in 2022 I had blood work drawn for iga ext gliadin. Since then I’ve developed worse stomach issues and all other health issues. My doctor just said cut out gluten. He did no further testing. Please see my test results attached. I just need some direction cause I feel so ill and the stomach pain is becoming worse. Can this test show indications for other gastrointestinal diseases?
    • Fayeb23
      Thank you. These were the results TTG ABS NUMERICAL: > 250.0 U/mL [< 14.99]  Really don’t understand the results!
    • Scott Adams
      Clearly from what you've said the info on Dailymed is much more up to date than the other site, which hasn't been updated since 2017. The fact that some companies might be repackaging drugs does not mean the info on the ingredients is not correct.
    • RMJ
      To evaluate the TTG antibody result we’d need to know the normal range for that lab.  Labs don’t all use the same units.  However, based on any normal ranges that I’ve seen and the listed result being greater than a number rather than a specific number, I’d say yes, that is high! Higher than the range where the test can give a quantitative result. You got good advice not to change your diet yet.  If you went gluten free your intestines would start to heal, confusing any further testing,
    • Bev in Milw
      Scott is correct….Thank you for catching that!      Direct link for info  of fillers.    http://www.glutenfreedrugs.com/Excipients.htm Link is on 2nd page  of www.glutenfreedrugs.com   Site was started by a pharmacist (or 2) maybe 15-20 yrs ago with LAST updated in  2017.  This makes it’s Drug List so old that it’s no longer relevant. Companies & contacts, along with suppliers &  sources would need to be referenced, same amount effort  as starting with current data on DailyMed      That being said, Excipient List is still be relevant since major changes to product labeling occurred prior ’17.           List is the dictionary that sources the ‘foreign-to-us’ terms used on pharmaceutical labels, terms we need to rule out gluten.    Note on DailyMed INFO— When you look for a specific drug on DailyMed, notice that nearly all of companies (brands/labels) are flagged as a ‘Repackager’… This would seem to suggest the actual ‘pills’ are being mass produced by a limited number of wholesaler suppliers (esp for older meds out of  patent protection.).      If so, multiple repackager-get  bulk shipments  from same supplier will all  be selling identical meds —same formula/fillers. Others repackager-could be switching suppliers  frequently based on cost, or runs both gluten-free & non- items on same lines.  No way to know  without contacting company.     While some I know have  searched pharmacies chasing a specific brand, long-term  solution is to find (or teach) pharmacy staff who’s willing help.    When I got 1st Rx ~8 years ago, I went to Walgreens & said I needed gluten-free.  Walked  out when pharmacist said  ‘How am I supposed  to know…’  (ar least he as honest… ). Walmart pharmacists down the block were ‘No problem!’—Once, they wouldn’t release my Rx, still waiting on gluten-free status from a new supplier. Re: Timeliness of DailyMed info?   A serendipitous conversation with cousin in Mi was unexpectedly reassuring.  She works in office of Perrigo, major products of OTC meds (was 1st to add gluten-free labels).  I TOTALLY lucked out when I asked about her job: “TODAY I trained a new full-time employee to make entries to Daily Med.’  Task had grown to hours a day, time she needed for tasks that couldn’t be delegated….We can only hope majorities of companies are as  conscientious!   For the Newbies…. SOLE  purpose of  fillers (possible gluten) in meds is to  hold the active ingredients together in a doseable form.  Drugs  given by injection or as IV are always gluten-free!  (Sometimes drs can do antibiotics w/ one-time injection rather than 7-10 days of  pills .) Liquid meds (typically for kids)—still read labels, but  could be an a simpler option for some products…
×
×
  • Create New...