Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Skin Biopsy Results?


MacieMay

Recommended Posts

MacieMay Explorer

These are my 18 mos olds skin biopsy results... Any insight will be greatly appreciated!

R, arm punch: Vacuolar interface dermatitis with perivascular and periadnexal lymphocytic inflammation

Comment: The histologic findings are consistent with a connective tissue disease

I don't understand why there is nothing about antibodies here?!?! If her rash is not related to gluten and is a being cause by a different autoimmune disease, shouldn't another type of antibody be here?

My husband took her for the biopsy. I do not know if the Derm biopsied the skin next to the lesion or lesion itself. My husband literally had beg him to do the biopsy, again we were being brushed off with a dx of eczema. It was a 0.2cm X 0.2cm x 0.2cm punch biopsy. If that helps anyone.

Please, anyone who has had negative skin biopsies for DH or any other experience with a skin biopsy, please share your insight. These results seems so vague to me. I feel like calling the lab to ask them questions.

Thanks!

MadsMegsandMacies Mom


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



ravenwoodglass Mentor

If the biopsy was done next to a lesion you should be able to see where it was done. Did your husband watch the procedure? If he did can he tell you about where the biopsy was done? Can you call the doctors office and ask? The placement of the biopsy and whether it was on the lesion itself should be in the record.

I would ask to follow this up with the doctor. Excema is not a connective tissue disorder as far as I know. You could also seek out a second opinion with another derm if you don't think the biopsy was done correctly.

nora-n Rookie

For DH, they have to look for DH in a special way.

I doubt they look for DH unless prompted.

They have to look at the sample in an electronic microcope I think, and look for fluorescent IgA deposits somehow,

if they took the sample somewhere where there has been a lesion, the IgA is used up and they cannot diagnose DH.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      129,787
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Dotty Beattie
    Newest Member
    Dotty Beattie
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.2k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • RMJ
      Do you have any other results from either of the two labs where you’ve been tested recently?  If so, are the newest results from that lab elevated over previous results? It took me 5 years to get all of my antibodies into the normal range. Then 3 years later one went up into the positive range.  I realized that I had started baking with a different brand of gluten free flour.  When I stopped using that flour the level went back to normal.  Has something changed in your diet, environment, activities, medications or other areas where you could possibly be exposed to gluten? 
    • thejayland10
      Thank you for the clarifcation, how can I get to the bottom of this as to why they may be elevated even on a super strict gluten-free diet? 
    • trents
    • Bronwyn W
      Hi, Please can I ask for opinions on using Anti-inflammatories for symptom treatment of inadvertent gluten exposure? Should it be part of a foundational treatment plan, upon inadvertent exposure? Kind Regards,  Bronwyn 
    • RMJ
      In testing for celiac disease total IgA is run just to be sure you’re not deficient (in which case the TTG IgA results would not be reliable). Different labs may have slightly different normal ranges, but the units are usually the same and the results can be compared.  In your case, what is meaningful for celiac disease is that you were not deficient in total IgA for either test. Different labs use different units for the TTG IgA test and there are no conversion factors to turn one into the other. In your case, the labs have another difference - one uses a weak positive category and one doesn’t.  The two results really can’t be compared. In each case you’re slightly into the full positive range for that test/lab so in reality your antibodies might not have jumped up at all between these two tests.  
×
×
  • Create New...