Jump to content

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Getting A Diagnosis

elk

Recommended Posts

elk Rookie
elk
Posted

My doctor says that it doesn't matter if I'm eating gluten or not in order for the anti-bodies to show up on the blood test. Based on what I've read, she's wrong. How long can I go gluten free before it affects my test results? I want to stop gluten asap, but I feel like I need the dx as added incentive to stay away from it.

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


ravenwoodglass Mentor
ravenwoodglass
Posted

Your doctor is wrong. The blood test looks for antibodies and if your not eating gluten your not going to be forming antibodies. You need to stay on gluten until all your testing is done. As soon as you are done with testing start the diet. Your response to the diet is the best diagnostic tool for whether you need the diet or not.

elk Rookie
elk
Posted
  • Author

Thanks. That's what I was afraid of.

elk Rookie
elk
Posted
  • Author

Another question: How about if I go 2 weeks without gluten then have a bunch of bread the night before my labs? Will that be sufficient for reliable results? I really don't think I can eat it daily until then. :(

ravenwoodglass Mentor
ravenwoodglass
Posted

Another question: How about if I go 2 weeks without gluten then have a bunch of bread the night before my labs? Will that be sufficient for reliable results? I really don't think I can eat it daily until then. :(

If your not already gluten free you are better off continueing on gluten until the tests. If you go gluten free for a couple weeks then load up the night before the tests you may become more ill than you are now. Have you called the doctor and asked if you can just pick up a lab slip for the tests? You may have to ask to speak to a nurse to get an answer but that shouldn't be an issue. If you are already gluten free now then depending on how long you have been gluten free you would need a challenge of about 2 months for the best chance at accurate blood work.

elk Rookie
elk
Posted
  • Author

I've been eating gluten about once a week for the past 6 months. Sometimes I go longer without eating it and sometimes it's more frequent. I just recently ate some and was in bed for 3 days with a migraine, etc.

tarnalberry Community Regular
tarnalberry
Posted

That is unlikely to be enough gluten to show up antibodies on the test. The recommendations are approximately three slices of bread every day for three months. There has to be enough damage to the intestines that the antibodies can leak into the blood stream in sufficient quantity to be detected.

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


elk Rookie
elk
Posted
  • Author

eesh, that sounds insane and I can't see me doing it, so I guess I'll go by how I feel and not an "official" diagnosis. I'm also starting to read some of the signatures and see that it's common to have a negative result anyway. Fun.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,684
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    Betty Siebert
    Newest Member
    Betty Siebert
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):



  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      Draft gluten-free ciders… can they be trusted ?

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      I'd go with a vodka tonic, but that's just me😉
    • Rejoicephd
      Draft gluten-free ciders… can they be trusted ?

      By Rejoicephd · Posted

      That and my nutritionist also said that drinking cider is one of the worst drink choices for me, given that I have candida overgrowth.  She said the combination of the alcohol and sugar would be very likely to worsen my candida problem.  She suggested that if I drink, I go for clear vodka, either neat or with a splash of cranberry.   So in summary, I am giving ciders a rest.  Whether it's a gluten risk or sugars and yeast overgrowth, its just not worth it.
    • Inkie
      Tea Bags and Gluten

      By Inkie · Posted

      Thank you for the information ill will definitely bring it into practice .
    • Scott Adams
      Tea Bags and Gluten

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      While plain, pure tea leaves (black, green, or white) are naturally gluten-free, the issue often lies not with the tea itself but with other ingredients or processing. Many flavored teas use barley malt or other gluten-containing grains as a flavoring agent, which would be clearly listed on the ingredient label. Cross-contamination is another possibility, either in the facility where the tea is processed or, surprisingly, from the tea bag material itself—some tea bags are sealed with a wheat-based glue. Furthermore, it's important to consider that your reaction could be to other substances in tea, such as high levels of tannins, which can be hard on the stomach, or to natural histamines or other compounds that can cause a non-celiac immune response. The best way to investigate is to carefully read labels for hidden ingredients, try switching to a certified gluten-free tea brand that uses whole leaf or pyramid-style bags, and see if the reaction persists.
    • Scott Adams
      Inconclusive results

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      This is a challenging and confusing situation. The combination of a positive EMA—which is a highly specific marker rarely yielding false positives—alongside strongly elevated TTG on two separate occasions, years apart, is profoundly suggestive of celiac disease, even in the absence of biopsy damage. This pattern strongly aligns with what is known as "potential celiac disease," where the immune system is clearly activated, but intestinal damage has not yet become visible under the microscope. Your concern about the long-term risk of continued gluten consumption is valid, especially given your family's experience with the consequences of delayed diagnosis. Since your daughter is now at an age where her buy-in is essential for a gluten-free lifestyle, obtaining a definitive answer is crucial for her long-term adherence and health. Given that she is asymptomatic yet serologically positive, a third biopsy now, after a proper 12-week challenge, offers the best chance to capture any microscopic damage that may have developed, providing the concrete evidence needed to justify the dietary change. This isn't about wanting her to have celiac; it's about wanting to prevent the insidious damage that can occur while waiting for symptoms to appear, and ultimately giving her the unambiguous "why" she needs to accept and commit to the necessary treatment. This article might be helpful. It breaks down each type of test, and what a positive results means in terms of the probability that you might have celiac disease. One test that always needs to be done is the IgA Levels/Deficiency Test (often called "Total IGA") because some people are naturally IGA deficient, and if this is the case, then certain blood tests for celiac disease might be false-negative, and other types of tests need to be done to make an accurate diagnosis. The article includes the "Mayo Clinic Protocol," which is the best overall protocol for results to be ~98% accurate.    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.