Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Finally Got A Copy Of My Blood Test Results


lvpriest

Recommended Posts

lvpriest Apprentice

Hello all,

So today, after 3 weeks of pestering, I finally got faxed a copy of my blood test results.

I've already had a follow-up appointment with the gastro to go through my results. Devoting 5 minutes (no joke, this guy is a private specialist on Harley Street in London, who is often running late due to over-running with other, I guess, 'more worthwhile' patients - which, judging by the waiting room, mean his old croney doctor type friends!) to summarise my results as 'highly satisfactory,' completing ruling out celiac, and advising me to stay on my anti depressants and prescribing me ibs medication.

I was gutted, I cried. Just because I felt really like a fraud - I posted in this forum soon after and you were all so supportive - I know having an affirmative diagnosis is not necessary, but I really felt like he just turned me away like a silly little gil making a fuss, but I have put up with this for so many years I know something is wrong! He also did an ultrasound and barium follow through, which also came back normal - at the initial stages, he was looking for anything.

Anyway, that was back in June that I got my results. From July, I decided to cut out gluten and dairy anyway, stuck with my anti deps but reduced to 10mg and the silly ibs pills. And I began to feel heaps better - my skin was better (no rash), my hair was thicker, my nails weren't breaking, my stomach was getting better and I was crazily out of wack and so unwell the day I had some almost certainly contaminated food.

SO I digress. My results come back as follows- please can you help interpret?

Transglutaminase IgA 6.9

I also have low haematocrit and RBC and high MCH - which the results tell me are indicative of anaemia.

Also, I am intrigued as although some might thing the IgA is low, I actually didn't eat gluten very much prior to the testing - I just wasn't a bread or pasta eater, but I definitely got it elsewhere, such as noodles, soups etc.

Any advice on my results gratefully received!!!

Lauren


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



i-geek Rookie

My tests came back negative as well, and like you, the only celiac test run from my blood was tTG-IgA. I'd been on a low-gluten diet because it was the only thing that alleviated some of the misery (I didn't know it could give false negatives). I know now that a total IgA test should have been done, because a total IgA deficiency is fairly common.

In short: these tests have a high rate of false negatives for a lot of reasons. If going gluten-free helps you, then stay with it.

tarnalberry Community Regular

Two things:

1) He didn't sufficiently test you for celiac. You can't tell a darn thing off that single test. Dumb doctor.

2) I would call the office back and let them know that the doctor missed reading the tests which clearly state you are anemic but he failed to tell you.

I'd also never go back to the guy.

(I've had abnormal results overlooked before, but it was in the transfer of care process, where my midwives sent my postnatal blood work results to my GP, but the office likely just filed it rather than having anyone review it. I'm still going to give my doctor a gentle earful (she's a great doctor, so I will do it as constructively as possible), however.)

Skylark Collaborator

Hi there. I'm sorry that doctor made you feel bad. There should be more tests like total IgA and anti-gliadin IgA in a celiac panel. Also, labs cannot be interpreted without the reference range.

I suspect you weren't eating enough gluten. The usual recommendation is four slices of bread a day worth of gluten for at least 4-6 weeks.

You may just have to trust your recovery off gluten. Remember, the absolute best way to test for food reactions is to take the food out of your diet and see whether you feel better.

cassP Contributor

that's a "weak" positive actually (in the ranges my doc had)-

but it doesnt matter-> you could be deficient or low on Iga serum.

plus there's other tests for celiac like stated above.

if you feel better off gluten- then you're on to something.

everything posted above is great advice.

dont feel bad!!!

:)

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,206
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Bennick
    Newest Member
    Bennick
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Fayeb23
      Thank you that’s really helpful, hopeful won’t have to have a biopsy.
    • RMJ
      That means the normal range (i.e. not celiac disease) would be a result less than 14.99.  Your result is WAY above that. Some gastroenterologists would diagnose that as celiac disease even without a confirming biopsy because it is more than ten times the top of the normal range.
    • Redanafs
      Hi everyone. Back in 2022 I had blood work drawn for iga ext gliadin. Since then I’ve developed worse stomach issues and all other health issues. My doctor just said cut out gluten. He did no further testing. Please see my test results attached. I just need some direction cause I feel so ill and the stomach pain is becoming worse. Can this test show indications for other gastrointestinal diseases?
    • Fayeb23
      Thank you. These were the results TTG ABS NUMERICAL: > 250.0 U/mL [< 14.99]  Really don’t understand the results!
    • Scott Adams
      Clearly from what you've said the info on Dailymed is much more up to date than the other site, which hasn't been updated since 2017. The fact that some companies might be repackaging drugs does not mean the info on the ingredients is not correct.
×
×
  • Create New...